Volume 37, Issue 5 pp. 758-767
Research Report
Free Access

Separate amygdala subregions signal surprise and predictiveness during associative fear learning in humans

Sabrina Boll

Corresponding Author

Sabrina Boll

Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Building W34, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany

Correspondence: Sabrina Boll, as above.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Matthias Gamer

Matthias Gamer

Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Building W34, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Sebastian Gluth

Sebastian Gluth

Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Building W34, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Jürgen Finsterbusch

Jürgen Finsterbusch

Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Building W34, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Christian Büchel

Christian Büchel

Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg–Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Building W34, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 December 2012
Citations: 70

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that learning signals in the amygdala might be best characterized by attentional theories of associative learning [such as Pearce–Hall (PH)] and more recent hybrid variants that combine Rescorla–Wagner and PH learning models. In these models, unsigned prediction errors (PEs) determine the associability of a cue, which is used in turn to control learning of outcome expectations dynamically and reflects a function of the reliability of prior outcome predictions. Here, we employed an aversive Pavlovian reversal-learning task to investigate computational signals derived from such a hybrid model. Unlike previous accounts, our paradigm allowed for the separate assessment of associability at the time of cue presentation and PEs at the time of outcome. We combined this approach with high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging to understand how different subregions of the human amygdala contribute to associative learning. Signal changes in the corticomedial amygdala and in the midbrain represented unsigned PEs at the time of outcome showing increased responses irrespective of whether a shock was unexpectedly administered or omitted. In contrast, activity in basolateral amygdala regions correlated negatively with associability at the time of cue presentation. Thus, whereas the corticomedial amygdala and the midbrain reflected immediate surprise, the basolateral amygdala represented predictiveness and displayed increased responses when outcome predictions became more reliable. These results extend previous findings on PH-like mechanisms in the amygdala and provide unique insights into human amygdala circuits during associative learning.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.