Volume 90, Issue 3 pp. 237-244
Original Article

Greater potency of darbepoetin-α than erythropoietin in suppression of serum hepcidin-25 and utilization of iron for erythropoiesis in hemodialysis patients

Shigeichi Shoji

Shigeichi Shoji

Shirasagi Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masaaki Inaba

Corresponding Author

Masaaki Inaba

Department of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

Department of Nephrology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

Correspondence Masaaki Inaba, MD, Department of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, Internal Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan. Tel: +81 6 6645 3806; Fax: +81 6 6645 3808; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Naohisa Tomosugi

Naohisa Tomosugi

Division of Advanced Medicine, Medical Research Institute, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Senji Okuno

Senji Okuno

Shirasagi Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Mitsuru Ichii

Mitsuru Ichii

Department of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

Department of Nephrology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Tomoyuki Yamakawa

Tomoyuki Yamakawa

Shirasagi Hospital, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Satoshi Kurihara

Satoshi Kurihara

Saitama-Tsukinomori Clinic, Saitama, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 January 2013
Citations: 29

Abstract

Background

The potency of darbepoetin-α (DPO-α) to improve anemia in hemodialysis (HD) patients is greater than that of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO).

Design and methods

To assess the potency of DPO-α to mobilize iron from body stores in comparison with rHuEPO in HD patients without apparent inflammation or infection, serum iron, transferrin saturation (TSAT), ferritin, and hepcidin-25 were measured serially. This study included (i) a long-term crossover study for 3 yr to compare the effects of the two erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) on serum iron, TSAT, and ferritin, and (ii) a short-term crossover study for 8 wk to examine their effects on serum hepcidin-25 in HD patients.

Results

The long-term crossover study demonstrated that the change of ESA from rHuEPO to DPO-α significantly decreased serum ferritin while serum iron and TSAT remained unchanged, while DPO-α as well as rHuEPO maintained hemoglobin level in the target range between 10.0 and 11.0 g/dL. Furthermore, in the short-term crossover study, area under the percent suppression of serum hepcidin-25 time curve for the first 7 d during the DPO-α treatment period was significantly greater than that during the rHuEPO period (348.0 ± 92.4 vs. 178.4 ± 131.5%.day = 0.030). The greater suppression of hepcidin-25 by DPO-α may facilitate iron mobilization, resulting in diminution of body iron stores without any significant effect on serum iron utilizable for erythropoiesis.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that DPO-α has a greater advantage than rHuEPO in that it facilitates iron mobilization from body stores into bone marrow to induce effective erythropoiesis and thus could protect against possible harmful effects caused by excessive iron stores in the body.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.