Volume 28, Issue 4 e13132
REGISTERED REPORT STAGE 1 : STUDY DESIGN

Evaluation of a telehealth psychological support intervention for people with primary brain tumour and their family members: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Tamara Ownsworth

Corresponding Author

Tamara Ownsworth

School of Applied Psychology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence

Tamara Ownsworth, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, Brisbane, Queensland 4122, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Suzanne Chambers

Suzanne Chambers

University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer (ANZUP) Trials Group, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Joanne F. Aitken

Joanne F. Aitken

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

School of Research–Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew Foote

Matthew Foote

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Mark B. Pinkham

Mark B. Pinkham

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Louisa G. Gordon

Louisa G. Gordon

School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Gemma Lock

Gemma Lock

Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Brigid Hanley

Brigid Hanley

Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Tracey Gardner

Tracey Gardner

Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Stephanie Jones

Stephanie Jones

School of Applied Psychology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Julia Robertson

Julia Robertson

School of Applied Psychology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
David Shum

David Shum

School of Applied Psychology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth Conlon

Elizabeth Conlon

School of Applied Psychology, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 July 2019
Citations: 16
Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12618001737224. Registered on October 22 2018 (updated October 31, 2018).

Funding information

National Health and Medical Research Council and Cancer Council Queensland.

Abstract

Objective

There is a lack of research on interventions that address the specific psychosocial needs of people with brain tumour and their families. This paper describes the protocol for a pragmatic randomised control trial (RCT) evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Making Sense of Brain Tumour program delivered via telehealth (Tele-MAST) relative to standard care.

Methods

The 148 adults with primary brain tumour will be randomly allocated to the 10-session Tele-MAST videoconferencing program or standard care from a cancer counselling service. The primary outcome is level of depression and secondary outcomes are quality of life, mental health and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year. The mental health and quality of life of family members will also be assessed. Assessments will be conducted at pre-intervention, post-intervention (primary endpoint), 6-weeks post-intervention and 6-months post-intervention. The main analysis will determine whether the Tele-MAST intervention is more effective than standard care at post-intervention, and whether these effects are sustained at follow-up.

Conclusion

Results will indicate whether the Tele-MAST program is associated with better clinical outcomes and is more cost-effective than existing cancer support services. Such outcomes will contribute to effective and accessible psychosocial care for the brain tumour population.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.