Volume 27, Issue 6 e12950
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Geriatric assessment in clinical practice for patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: The Grup de Investigació I Divulgació Oncològica experience

Regina Gironés

Corresponding Author

Regina Gironés

Hospital Lluis Alcanyís, Medical Oncology Unit, Xátiva, Spain

Correspondence

Regina Gironés, Hospital Lluís Alcanyís, Xàtiva, Valencia, Spain.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Francisco Aparisi

Francisco Aparisi

Hospital General de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
José García-Sánchez

José García-Sánchez

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Medical Oncology Unit, Valencia, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Alfredo Sánchez-Hernández

Alfredo Sánchez-Hernández

Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Medical Oncology Service, Castellón, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Francisco García Piñón

Francisco García Piñón

Freelance Biostatistician Assigned to GIDO, Valencia, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Óscar Juan-Vidal

Óscar Juan-Vidal

Hopsital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 October 2018
Citations: 8

Abstract

Therapeutic decision-making for older patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with no identifiable activating mutation is complex. In this prospective study, we evaluated the usefulness of geriatric assessment (GA) in identifying frail patients. Stage IV NSCLC patients ≥70 years of age were evaluated with GA and classified according to this evaluation into three different groups: fit, vulnerable and frail. Classifications based on GA, treatment decision, toxicity and overall survival were analysed. In total, 93 patients were included. Median age was 76 (70–92) years and 90% were men. Most patients had performance status (PS) 0 or 1 (82%), unrelated to their GA (p = 0.006). GA groups were associated with overall survival (p = 0.000), treatment decision (p = 0.0001), and toxicity (p = 0.0001). Chemotherapy was delivered to 100% of fit patients, to 48% of vulnerable patients, and to only 8% of frail patients (= 0.000). Toxicity was higher in vulnerable patients than in fit individuals (p = 0.000). Multivariable analysis showed PS (p = 0.001), active treatment (p < 0.001) and GA group (p = 0.001) to be prognostic factors related to survival. Our results suggest that GA identified patients with poor natural prognosis.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.