Patients’ perceptions of colposcopy pain
Corresponding Author
S. Kola-Palmer PhD
Senior Lecturer in Psychology
Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, UK
Correspondence address: Susanna Kola-Palmer, Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorJ.C. Walsh PhD
Lecturer in Psychology
School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorM. Rogers Msc
Senior Lecturer and Advanced Nurse Practitioner
Department of Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
S. Kola-Palmer PhD
Senior Lecturer in Psychology
Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, UK
Correspondence address: Susanna Kola-Palmer, Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorJ.C. Walsh PhD
Lecturer in Psychology
School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
Search for more papers by this authorM. Rogers Msc
Senior Lecturer and Advanced Nurse Practitioner
Department of Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This study aimed to examine the sensory descriptors used by women undergoing their first ever colposcopy examination as part of cervical cancer screening. Immediately following colposcopy, women were asked to provide detailed information about the sensory, affective, evaluative and intensity properties of the colposcopy examination using a validated, standardised questionnaire. Overall, 160 colposcopy patients with different management options were assessed [53 women underwent diagnostic colposcopy only, 76 had colposcopy plus punch biopsy, 31 women had colposcopy plus see-and-treat large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) treatment]. The results demonstrated that women report greater pain intensity with more intensive management options, such that women who have punch biopsy or LLETZ treatment report significantly more pain than women who have diagnostic colposcopy. In addition, with increasing intensity of treatment, the number of qualitative sensory and pain descriptors increase. This information can usefully be incorporated into colposcopy information leaflets, to ensure the sensory and affective experience of colposcopy is fully explained to women prior to attending. Expanding the preparatory information that women receive may serve to reduce anxiety, pain and distress associated with colposcopy.
References
- Arntz A. & Lousberg R. (1990) The effects of underestimated pain and their relationship to habituation. Behaviour Research and Therapy 28, 15–28.
- Arntz A., van Eck M. & Heijmans M. (1990) Predictions of dental pain: the fear of any expected evil, is worse than the evil itself. Behaviour Research and Therapy 28, 29–41.
- Barsevick A.M. & Lauver D. (1990) Women's informational needs about colposcopy. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship 22, 23–26.
- Bekkers R.L., van der Donck M., Klaver F.M., van Minnen A. & Massuger L.F. (2002) Variables influencing anxiety of patients with abnormal cervical smears referred for colposcopy. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 23, 257–261.
- Bell S., Porter M., Kitchener H., Fraser C.,Fisher P., & Mann E. (1995) Psychological response to cervical screening. Preventive Medicine 24, 610–616.
- Bonevski B., Sanson-Fisher R., Girgis A. & Perkins J. (1998) Women's experiences of having a colposcopic examination: self-reported satisfaction with care, perceived needs and consequences. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 18, 462–470.
- Bosgraaf R.P., De Jager W.C., Servaes P., Prins J.B., Massuger L.F. & Bekkers R.L. (2013) Qualitative insights into the psychological stress before and during colposcopy: a focus group study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 34, 150–156.
- Comber H. & Gavin A. (2004) Recent trends in cervical cancer mortality in Britain and Ireland: the case for population-based cervical cancer screening. British Journal of Cancer 91, 1902–1904.
- Crombez G., Baeyens F. & Eelen P. (1994) Sensory and temporal information about impending pain: the influence of predictability on pain. Behaviour Research and Therapy 32, 611–622.
- Crompton A.C. & Johnson N. (1994) Which is more painful? A randomized trial comparing loop with laser excision of the cervical transformation zone. Gynecologic Oncology 52, 392–394.
- De Bie R.P., Massuger L.F.A.G., Lenselink C.H., Derksen Y.H.M., Prins J.B. & Bekkers R.L.M. (2011) The role of individually targeted information to reduce anxiety before colposcopy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 118, 945–950.
- Dodd R.H., McCaffery K.J., Marlow L.A., Ostini R., Zimet G.D. & Waller J. (2014) Knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the USA, the UK and Australia: an international survey. Sexually Transmitted Infections 90, 201–207.
- Fang C.Y., Miller S.M., Mills M., Mangan C.E., Belch R., Campbell D.E. & Douglas S.D. (2003) The effects of avoidance on cytotoxic/suppressor T cells in women with cervical lesions. Psycho-Oncology 12, 590–598.
- Fang C.Y., Miller S.M., Bovbjerg D.H., Bergman C., Edelson M.I., Rosenblum N.G., Bove B.A., Godwin A.K., Campbell D.E. & Douglas S.D. (2008) Perceived stress is associated with impaired T-cell response to HPV16 in women with cervical dysplasia. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 35, 87–96.
- Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Ervik M., Dikshit R., Eser S., Mathers C., Rebelo M., Parkin D., Forman D. & Bray F. (2013) Globocan 2012 v1. 0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11 [Internet]. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
- French D.P., Maissi E. & Marteau T.M. (2004) Psychological costs of inadequate cervical smear test results. British Journal of Cancer 91, 1887–1892.
- Gath D.H., Hallam N., Mynors-Wallis L., Day A. & Bond S.A. (1995) Emotional reactions in women attending a UK colposcopy clinic. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 49, 79–83.
- Hellsten C., Sjostrom K. & Lindqvist P.G. (2007) A prospective Swedish cohort study on psychosocial factors influencing anxiety in women referred for colposcopy. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 114, 32–38.
- Hellsten C., Sjostrom K. & Lindqvist P.G. (2008) A 2-year follow-up study of anxiety and depression in women referred for colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115, 212–218.
- Howells R.E., Dunn P.D., Isasi T., Chenoy R., Calvert E., Jones P.W., Shroff J.F. & Redman C.W. (1999) Is the provision of information leaflets before colposcopy beneficial? A prospective randomised study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 106, 528–534.
- Jaaniste T., Hayes B. & Von Baeyer C.L. (2007) Providing children with information about forthcoming medical procedures: a review and synthesis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 14, 124–143.
- Jensen M.P. & Karoly P. (2001) Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. In: Handbook of Pain Assessment (eds D.C. Turk & R. Melzack), pp. 15–34. Guildford, New York, NY, USA.
- Jensen M.P., Karoly P. & Braver S. (1986) The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 27, 117–126.
- Johnson J.E. (1999) Self-regulation theory and coping with physical illness. Research in Nursing and Health 22, 435–448.
10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199912)22:6<435::AID-NUR2>3.0.CO;2-Q CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Johnston M. & Vogele C. (1993) Benefits of psychological preparation for surgery: a meta-analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 15, 245–256.
- Jones M.H., Singer A. & Jenkins D. (1996) The mildly abnormal cervical smear: patient anxiety and choice of management. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 89, 257–260.
- Kavanagh A.M. & Broom D.H. (1997) Women's understanding of abnormal cervical smear test results: a qualitative interview study. British Medical Journal 314, 1388–1391.
- Kola S. & Walsh J.C. (2009) Patients’ psychological reactions to colposcopy and LLETZ treatment for further evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 146, 96–99.
- Kola S. & Walsh J.C. (2012) Determinants of pre-procedural state anxiety and negative affect in first-time colposcopy patients: implications for intervention. European Journal of Cancer Care 21, 469–476.
- Kola S., Walsh J.C., Hughes B.M. & Howard S. (2012) Attention focus, trait anxiety and pain perception in patients undergoing colposcopy. European Journal of Pain 16, 890–900.
- Kola S., Walsh J.C., Hughes B.M. & Howard S. (2013) Matching intra-procedural information with coping style reduces psychophysiological arousal in women undergoing colposcopy. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 36, 401–412.
- Kola-Palmer S. & Walsh J.C. (2015) Correlates of psychological distress immediately following colposcopy. Psycho-Oncology doi:10.1002/pon.3738.
- Lang E.V., Hatsiopoulou O., Koch T., Berbaum K., Lutgendorf S., Kettenmann E., Logan H. & Kaptchuk T.J. (2005) Can words hurt? Patient-provider interactions during invasive procedures. Pain 114, 303–309.
- Lauver D.R., Baggot A. & Kruse K. (1999a) Women's experiences in coping with abnormal Papanicolaou results and follow-up colposcopy. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 28, 283–290.
- Lauver D.R., Kruse K. & Baggot A. (1999b) Women's uncertainties, coping, and moods regarding abnormal papanicolaou results. Journal of Womens Health and Gender-Based Medicine 8, 1103–1112.
- Leventhal H., Brown D., Shacham S. & Engquist G. (1979) Effects of preparatory information about sensations, threat of pain, and attention on cold pressor distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 688–714.
- Maissi E., Marteau T.M., Hankins M., Moss S., Legood R. & Gray A. (2004) Psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: cross sectional questionnaire study. British Medical Journal 328, 1293.
- Marteau T.M., Kidd J., Cuddeford L. & Walker P. (1996) Reducing anxiety in women referred for colposcopy using an information booklet. British Journal of Health Psychology 1, 181–189.
- Mckee M.D., Lurio J., Marantz P., Burton W. & Mulvihill M. (1999) Barriers to follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears in an urban community health center. Archives of Family Medicine 8, 129–134.
- Melzack R. (1975) The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1, 277–299.
- Melzack R. & Katz J. (2001) The McGill Pain Questionnaire: appraisal and current status. In: Handbook of Pain Assessment, 2nd edn (eds D.C. Turk & R. Melzack). Guildford, New York, NY, USA.
- Miller S.M., Roussi P., Altman D., Helm W. & Steinberg A. (1994) Effects of coping style on psychological reactions of low-income, minority women to colposcopy. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 39, 711–718.
- Neale J., Pitts M.K., Dunn P.D., Hughes G.M. & Redman C.W. (2003) An observational study of precolposcopy education sessions: what do women want to know? Health Care for Women International 24, 468–475.
- Orbell S., Hagger S., Brown V. & Tidy J. (2004) Appraisal theory and emotional sequelae of first visit to colposcopy following an abnormal cervical screening result. British Journal of Health Psychology 9, 533–555.
- Parkin D.M., Bray F.I. & Devesa S.S. (2001) Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. European Journal of Cancer 37, S4–S66.
- Peto J., Gilham C., Fletcher O. & Matthews F.E. (2004) The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 364, 249–256.
- Philips Z., Avis M. & Whynes D.K. (2005) Knowledge of cervical cancer and screening among women in east-central England. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 15, 639–645.
- Price D.D., Riley Iii J.L. & Wade J.B. (2001) Psychophysical approaches to measurement of the dimensions and stages of pain. In: Handbook of Pain Assessment, 2nd edn (eds D.C. Turk & R. Melzack), pp. 53–75. Guildford Press, New York, NY, USA.
- Pruitt S.L., Parker P.A., Peterson S.K., Le T., Follen M. & Basen-Engquist K. (2005) Knowledge of cervical dysplasia and human papillomavirus among women seen in a colposcopy clinic. Gynecologic Oncology 99, S236–S244.
- Sharp L., Cotton S., Carsin A.-E., Gray N., Thornton A., Cruickshank M. & Little J. (2013) Factors associated with psychological distress following colposcopy among women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology: a prospective study within the Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears (TOMBOLA). Psycho-Oncology 22, 368–380.
- Sigurdsson K. & Sigvaldason H. (2006) Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in Iceland, 1964-2002: a study on trends in incidence and mortality and the effect of risk factors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 85, 343–349.
- Suls J. & Wan C.K. (1989) Effects of sensory and procedural information on coping with stressful medical procedures and pain: a meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 57, 372.
- Tomaino-Brunner C., Freda M.C., Damus K. & Runowicz C.D. (1998) Can precolposcopy education increase knowledge and decrease anxiety? Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 27, 636–645.
- The TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears) Group. (2009) After-effects reported by women following colposcopy, cervical biopsies and LLETZ: results from the TOMBOLA trial. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116, 1506–1514.
- Wallace L.M. (1985) Surgical patients’ expectations of pain and discomfort: does accuracy of expectations minimize post-surgical pain and distress? Pain 22, 363–373.
- Wilkinson C., Jones J.M. & Mcbride J. (1990) Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial. British Medical Journal 300, 440.