Volume 22, Issue 2 pp. 196-201
Original Article

Reliability and validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand size in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema

Y. Borthwick B.Sc Physiotherapy

Y. Borthwick B.Sc Physiotherapy

University Teacher, Lymphoedema Specialist

Nursing & Health Care, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Strathcarron Hospice, Forth Valley Lymphoedema Service, Denny, UK

Search for more papers by this author
L. Paul PhD

L. Paul PhD

Reader

Nursing & Health Care, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Search for more papers by this author
M. Sneddon MSc (Med Sci) Research

M. Sneddon MSc (Med Sci) Research

Head of Nursing and Health Care School

Nursing & Health Care, School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Search for more papers by this author
L. McAlpine B.Sc Physiotherapy

L. McAlpine B.Sc Physiotherapy

Senior Physiotherapist

Physiotherapy Area, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK

Search for more papers by this author
C. Miller PhD Statistics

C. Miller PhD Statistics

Lecturer

School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 January 2013
Citations: 28
Correspondence address: Yolande Borthwick, Nursing & Health Care, 59 Oakfield Avenue, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8LL, UK (e-mail: [email protected]).

Reliability and validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand size in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema

Breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) affects 24–42% of patients following treatment for breast cancer. The gold standard method of measuring hand swelling associated with BCRL is to use water displacement (volumeter). This is not always possible in the clinical setting and the figure-of-eight method, which involves wrapping a simple measuring tape around the hand in a specific way, may be an alternative. The aim of the study was to examine the reliability and validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand size in women with BCRL. Twenty-four patients with hand swelling associated with BCRL participated. Two novice testers performed three ‘blinded’ figure-of-eight measurements and three volumetric measurements of each hand. In terms of intertester (between-tester) and intratester (within-tester) reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were all greater than 0.8 indicating high intra- and intertester reliability for the figure-of-eight method. For validity, a Pearson's moment correlation computed between the figure-of-eight and volumetric methods highlighted a statistically significant correlation of 0.7 between the methods for both testers. The figure-of-eight method was found to be a valid and reliable method of measuring hand swelling in this population.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.