Volume 37, Issue 4 pp. 434-435
Video Article
Free Access

Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage using a novel cholangioscope

Ryosuke Hamamura

Ryosuke Hamamura

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masanori Kobayashi

Corresponding Author

Masanori Kobayashi

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Corresponding: Masanori Kobayashi, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Ryuichi Okamoto

Ryuichi Okamoto

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 October 2024

Abstract

Watch a video of this article.

BRIEF EXPLANATION

A 73-year-old man, recently treated with stent-graft insertion for an abdominal aortic aneurysm, developed acute cholecystitis from gallstones in a preshock state (Fig. 1a). Cholecystectomy was deemed high risk, and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) was planned but considered unsafe due to Chilaiditi syndrome. Therefore, endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) was conducted. However, the cystic duct could not be visualized on cholangiography despite meticulous guidewire exploration for ~10 min, failing to identify its bifurcation. We then attempted to locate the cystic duct using a novel cholangioscope with a cytology brush sheath, as previously reported for confirming residual bile duct stones.1 This method utilizes only the reusable complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera unit of an ultrathin cholangioscope (DRES Slim Scope; Japan Lifeline, priced at 300,000 yen for ~10 uses) which is passed through the brush lumen of a double-lumen bile duct cytology brush (CytoMaxII; Cook Japan, Tokyo, Japan) (Fig. 1b,c). By replacing the original sheath, which costs 39,000 yen, with the CytoMaxII priced at 12,000 yen, the cost of using the cholangioscope is reduced to 42,000 yen per procedure. Moreover, this method allows the sheath to function similarly to an endoscopic hood, enabling reliable exploration of the cystic duct bifurcation (Fig. 1d). With this method, it became possible to safely advance the guidewire into the gallbladder, ultimately allowing for the placement of an ETGBD tube (Fig. 1e, Video S1).

Details are in the caption following the image
Application example for cholecystitis with Chilaiditi syndrome. (a) A 73-year-old man developed acute cholecystitis due to a gallstone (red arrowhead). Performing percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage was challenging because the colon was positioned between the liver and diaphragm (yellow arrowhead). (b) The brush from the double-lumen cytology brush was removed, and a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera was inserted into the lumen. The addition of a Y-shaped connector to the guidewire lumen enables the cleaning of the bile duct with physiological saline solution. The enlarged tip is shown in the upper right corner. One grid square represents 2 mm. (c) Schematic representation of an ultrathin cholangioscope utilized with the sheath of a double-lumen cytology brush. OD, outer diameter. (d) The cystic duct bifurcation was identified using this method, and the guidewire was successfully inserted into the gallbladder. (e) The stent was safely placed into the gallbladder, leading to a rapid improvement of cholecystitis.

In cases where surgery or PTGBD is not feasible and ETGBD is necessary, inserting a guidewire into the cystic duct is essential but often challenging.2, 3 Using peroral cholangioscopy allows for safer and more reliable guidewire insertion compared to relying solely on X-ray images,4 yet cholangioscopes are expensive and less accessible. Our method balances cost and reliability in challenging ETGBD situations and also holds various other possibilities.

Authors declare no conflict of interest for this article.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.