Volume 38, Issue 10 e15467
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Subclinical Pancreas Rejection on Protocol Biopsy Within the First Year of Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplant

Pooja Budhiraja

Corresponding Author

Pooja Budhiraja

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Correspondence: Pooja Budhiraja ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Raymond L. Heilman

Raymond L. Heilman

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard Butterfield

Richard Butterfield

Division of Statistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kunam S. Reddy

Kunam S. Reddy

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Hassan A. Khamash

Hassan A. Khamash

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Bassam G. Abu Jawdeh

Bassam G. Abu Jawdeh

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Caroline C. Jadlowiec

Caroline C. Jadlowiec

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nitin Katariya

Nitin Katariya

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Maxwell Smith

Maxwell Smith

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Andres Jaramillo

Andres Jaramillo

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Salah Alajous

Salah Alajous

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Amit Mathur

Amit Mathur

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Katrin Hacke

Katrin Hacke

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Harini A. Chakkera

Harini A. Chakkera

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 September 2024
Citations: 2

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

ABSTRACT

This single-center retrospective study investigated subclinical rejection prevalence and significance in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients. We analyzed 352 SPKT recipients from July 2003 to April 2022. Our protocol included pancreas allograft surveillance biopsies at 1, 4, and 12months post-transplant. After excluding 153 patients unable to undergo pancreas biopsy, our study cohort comprised 199 recipients. Among the 199 patients with protocol pancreas biopsies, 107 had multiple protocol pancreas biopsies in the first year, totaling 323. Subclinical rejection was identified in 132 episodes (41%). Of these, 72% were Grade 1, 20% were indeterminate, and 8% were Banff Grade 2 or higher. All episodes of subclinical rejection were treated. Rates of pancreas graft loss (10% vs. 7%) and clinical rejection (21% vs. 20%) at 3 years were similar between those with and without subclinical rejection. Subclinical rejection Banff Grade 2 or more was associated with poor pancreas graft survival HR of 5.5 (95% CI: 1.24–24.37, p = 0.025). Of 236 simultaneous protocol kidney and pancreas biopsies, 102 (43%) showed pancreas subclinical rejection, while only 17% had concurrent kidney subclinical rejection. Our findings suggest limited predictive value of pancreatic enzymes and euglycemia in detecting pancreas rejection. Furthermore, poor concordance existed between pancreas and kidney subclinical rejection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.