Volume 38, Issue 6 e15375
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Clinical and Economic Impact of CMV Infection in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Perspectives from a Middle-Income Nation

Gin Gin Gan

Corresponding Author

Gin Gin Gan

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Correspondence: Gin Gin Gan ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Thevambiga Iyadorai

Thevambiga Iyadorai

Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author
Noor Yuhyi Sulaiman

Noor Yuhyi Sulaiman

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author
Najihah Hussein

Najihah Hussein

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author
Hany Ariffin

Hany Ariffin

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 June 2024

Funding: This work was supported by grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD).

ABSTRACT

Background

Cytomegalovirus infection (CMV) is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). CMV infection increases transplantation costs; however, the extent of the financial burden may vary in different countries. This study aims to determine the clinical and economic impact of CMV infection in patients undergoing AHSCT in a middle-income country.

Methods

A total of 150 adult and pediatric patients post-AHSCT were included for analysis. In addition to incidence of CMV infections, data on graft versus host disease (GVHD) were also collected. Standard hospital charges for AHSCT and any additional transplantation-related expenditure within 12 months were also retrieved in 104 patients.

Results

CMV infection, acute GVHD and chronic GVHD occurred in 38.7%, 60.7%, and 22.0% of patients, respectively. Patients with CMV infections had higher readmission rates compared to those who did not (67.2% vs. 47.8%; p = 0.020). Additional expenditure was seen in HLA-haploidentical AHSCT and CMV infection (MYR11 712.25/USD2 504.49; p < 0.0001 and MYR5 807.24/USD1 241.79; p = 0.036), respectively.

Conclusion

This single-center study demonstrated that patients who underwent HLA-haploidentical AHSCT and subsequently developed CMV infection had higher transplantation expenditures compared to those who had matched-related transplantation. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate if primary prophylaxis against CMV is cost-effective, especially in patients who undergo HLA-haploidentical AHSCT.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.