Volume 29, Issue 9 pp. 763-770
Original Article

Right ventricular failure after implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist device: analysis of predictors and outcomes

Casey Lo

Casey Lo

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Vic., Australia

Department of Surgery, The Alfred, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Deirdre Murphy

Deirdre Murphy

Intensive Care Unit, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Vic., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Robyn Summerhayes

Robyn Summerhayes

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Vic., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Margaret Quayle

Margaret Quayle

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Vic., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Aiden Burrell

Aiden Burrell

Intensive Care Unit, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Vic., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Bailey

Michael Bailey

Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Silvana F. Marasco

Corresponding Author

Silvana F. Marasco

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Vic., Australia

Department of Surgery, The Alfred, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia

Corresponding author: A/Prof. Silvana F. Marasco, FRACS, CJOB Cardiothoracic Department, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd, Prahran 3181, Australia.

Tel.: +61 3 9076 2558; fax: +61 3 9076 2037; e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 June 2015
Citations: 26
Conflict of interest: These authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abstract

Postoperative right ventricular failure is a serious complication for up to 50% of patients following LVAD insertion. Predicting RV failure is an important factor for patients as planned BiVAD support has been shown to correlate with better outcomes compared to delayed BiVAD to LVAD conversion. This retrospective study examined prospectively collected data for 101 patients implanted with an LVAD between 2003 and 2013, aiming to establish preoperative predictive factors for RVF post-LVAD insertion, analyze outcomes, and validate existing RVF scoring systems. In our cohort, 63 patients (62.4%) developed RV failure and consequently demonstrated consistently poorer survival throughout the follow-up period (log-rank p = 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression identified two significant variables: cardiac index <2.2 preoperatively despite inotropic support (OR 4.6 [95%CI 1.8–11.8]; p = 0.001) and preoperative tricuspid regurgitation (OR 8.1 [95%CI 1.9–34]; p = 0.004). Patients who developed RV failure had more complicated postoperative courses including longer ICU stay (p < 0.001), higher incidence of transfusions (p = 0.03) and re-intubation (p = 0.001), longer ventilation duration (p < 0.001), and higher incidence of returning to theater (p = 0.0008). This study found that previous validation models had only moderate correlation with our population emphasizing the need for prospective validation of these scores in the current era of continuous flow devices.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.