A transformational change in scintigraphic gastroesophageal reflux studies: A comparison with historic techniques
Abstract
Background
The inclusion of scintigraphy in the diagnostic algorithm for gastroesophageal reflux is controversial due to variability in methodology and reporting. A novel scintigraphic reflux study has been developed and validated against the current standards for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD).
Objective
To compare a new scintigraphic reflux test against historic techniques and standardised diagnostic reference tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Methods
Paired scintigraphic studies were conducted in seventeen patients. All patients underwent at least one other standardised diagnostic reflux test such as 24- hour oesophageal impedance/ pH, and oesophageal manometry, barium swallow, gastroscopy or the Peptest. Patients inadvertently presented at sites B for scintigraphic reflux testing rather than at Site A which was part of an approved study. The findings from sites B did not correlate with clinical symptoms and other diagnostic reference tests from GORD. These studies were then repeated at Site A with approval from the patients. A second reflux study was performed at site A, utilising a novel technique with the capability of assessing oesophageal and extra-oesophageal disease.
Results
The Site A technique shows good concordance with the reference diagnostic tests with an accuracy of 82.4% and kappa of 0.64 (SE: 0.16, p = 0.00). Site B had an overall accuracy of 47.1% and kappa of 0.066 (SE: 0.068, p = 0.45).
Conclusion
The Site A technique shows higher accuracy than either site B or the historic reflux techniques. It has characteristics that make it an effective screening tool for assessment of local oesophageal disease and its extraoesophageal manifestations.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
There are no conflicts of interests to declare.
