A comparison of accuracy among different approaches of static-guided implant placement in patients treated with mandibular reconstruction: A retrospective study
Yi-Fan Kang
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorYan-Jun Ge
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorMeng-Kun Ding
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorJian-Feng Liu-Fu
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorZhi-Gang Cai
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Xiao-Feng Shan
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Correspondence
Xiao-Feng Shan, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, No. 22, Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYi-Fan Kang
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorYan-Jun Ge
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorMeng-Kun Ding
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorJian-Feng Liu-Fu
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorZhi-Gang Cai
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Xiao-Feng Shan
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China
National Center of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health, National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing, China
Correspondence
Xiao-Feng Shan, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, No. 22, Zhongguancun South Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the differences in the accuracy of immediate intraoral, immediate extraoral, and delayed dental implant placement with surgical guides (static computer-aided implant surgery) in patients treated with mandibular reconstruction.
Methods
This was a retrospective study. The patients were divided into three groups: immediate intraoral placement (IIO), immediate extraoral placement (IEO), and delayed placement (DEL). Four variables were used to compare the planned and actual implant positions: angular deviation, three-dimensional (3D) deviation at the entry point of the implant, 3D deviation at the apical point of the implant, and depth deviation.
Results
The angular deviation was significantly higher in the IIO group than in the IEO (p < .05) and DEL (p < .05) groups. The 3D deviation at the entry point was significantly higher in the IIO group than in the IEO (p < .05) and DEL (p < .01) groups. The 3D deviation at the apical point was significantly higher in the IIO group than in the IEO (p < .01) and DEL (p < .01) groups. The depth deviation was significantly higher in the IIO group than in the IEO (p < .05) and DEL (p < .05) groups. There was no statistical difference between the IEO and DEL group in angular and 3D deviation.
Conclusion
With surgical guides, among the different approaches for implant placement, delayed implant placement remains the most accurate approach for patients treated with mandibular reconstruction.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
None.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Supporting Information
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| clr14219-sup-0001-FigureS1.pngPNG image, 79.3 KB |
Figure S1 |
| clr14219-sup-0002-Figurecaption.docxWord 2007 document , 11.4 KB |
Data S1 |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Buser, D., Bornstein, M. M., Weber, H. P., Grutter, L., Schmid, B., & Belser, U. C. (2008). Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: A cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2- to 4-year follow-up. Journal of Periodontology, 79(9), 1773–1781. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080071
- Buser, D., Halbritter, S., Hart, C., Bornstein, M. M., Grutter, L., Chappuis, V., & Belser, U. C. (2009). Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. Journal of Periodontology, 80(1), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080360
- Buser, D., Janner, S. F., Wittneben, J. G., Bragger, U., Ramseier, C. A., & Salvi, G. E. (2012). 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 14(6), 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x
- Buser, D., Wittneben, J., Bornstein, M. M., Grutter, L., Chappuis, V., & Belser, U. C. (2011). Stability of contour augmentation and esthetic outcomes of implant-supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: 3-year results of a prospective study with early implant placement postextraction. Journal of Periodontology, 82(3), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100408
- D'Haese, J., Ackhurst, J., Wismeijer, D., De Bruyn, H., & Tahmaseb, A. (2017). Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontology 2000, 73(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12175
- Kang, Y. F., Ding, M. K., Qiu, S. Y., Cai, Z. G., Zhang, L., & Shan, X. F. (2022). Mandibular reconstruction using iliac flap based on occlusion-driven workflow transferred by digital surgical guides. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 80(11), 1858–1865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.07.140
- Kang, Y. F., Lv, X. M., Qiu, S. Y., Ding, M. K., Xie, S., Zhang, L., Cai, Z. G., & Shan, X. F. (2021). Virtual surgical planning of deep circumflex iliac artery flap for midface reconstruction. Frontiers in Oncology, 11, 718146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.718146
- Khadembaschi, D., Brierly, G. I., Chatfield, M. D., Beech, N., & Batstone, M. D. (2020). Systematic review and pooled analysis of survival rates, success, and outcomes of osseointegrated implants in a variety of composite free flaps. Head & Neck, 42(9), 2669–2686. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26238
- Levine, J. P., Bae, J. S., Soares, M., Brecht, L. E., Saadeh, P. B., Ceradini, D. J., & Hirsch, D. L. (2013). Jaw in a day: Total maxillofacial reconstruction using digital technology. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 131(6), 1386–1391. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd8d0
- Lodders, J. N., Leusink, F. K. J., Ridwan-Pramana, A., Winters, H. A. H., Karagozoglu, K. H., Dekker, H., Forouzanfar, T., & Schulten, E. (2021). Long-term outcomes of implant-based dental rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients after reconstruction with the free vascularized fibula flap. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 49(9), 845–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2021.03.002
- Massuda, C. K. M., de Carvalho, M. R., de Moraes, J. B., Pallos, D., & Kim, Y. J. (2022). Accuracy of guided dental implant surgery using a fully digital workflow: A case series. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.016
- Panchal, H., Shamsunder, M. G., Petrovic, I., Rosen, E. B., Allen, R. J., Jr., Hernandez, M., Ganly, I., Boyle, J. O., Matros, E., & Nelson, J. A. (2020). Dental implant survival in vascularized bone flaps: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 146(3), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007077
- Qiu, S., Kang, Y., Ding, M., Zhu, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Shan, X., & Cai, Z. (2021). Mandibular reconstruction with the iliac flap under the guidance of a series of digital surgical guides. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32(5), 1777–1779. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007494
- Rogers, S. N., Laher, S. H., Overend, L., & Lowe, D. (2002). Importance-rating using the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire in patients treated by primary surgery for oral and oro-pharyngeal cancer. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 30(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2001.0273
- Rogers, S. N., McNally, D., Mahmoud, M., Chan, M. F., & Humphris, G. M. (1999). Psychologic response of the edentulous patient after primary surgery for oral cancer: A cross-sectional study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 82(3), 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70087-9
- Shaw, R. J., Sutton, A. F., Cawood, J. I., Howell, R. A., Lowe, D., Brown, J. S., Rogers, S. N., & Vaughan, E. D. (2005). Oral rehabilitation after treatment for head and neck malignancy. Head & Neck, 27(6), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20176
- Tahmaseb, A., De Clerck, R., & Wismeijer, D. (2009). Computer-guided implant placement: 3D planning software, fixed intraoral reference points, and CAD/CAM technology. A case report. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 24(3), 541–546.
- Tahmaseb, A., Wu, V., Wismeijer, D., Coucke, W., & Evans, C. (2018). The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 29(Suppl 16), 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13346
- Tatakis, D. N., Chien, H. H., & Parashis, A. O. (2019). Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. Periodontology 2000, 81(1), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12292
- Vercruyssen, M., Cox, C., Coucke, W., Naert, I., Jacobs, R., & Quirynen, M. (2014). A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 41(7), 717–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12231
- Vercruyssen, M., Hultin, M., Van Assche, N., Svensson, K., Naert, I., & Quirynen, M. (2014). Guided surgery: Accuracy and efficacy. Periodontology 2000, 66(1), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12046
- Woods, B., Schenberg, M., & Chandu, A. (2019). A comparison of immediate and delayed dental implant placement in head and neck surgery patients. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 77(6), 1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.02.007
- Zhang, L., Ding, Q., Liu, C., Sun, Y., Xie, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Survival, function, and complications of Oral implants placed in bone flaps in jaw rehabilitation: A systematic review. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 29(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4402
- Zheng, G. S., Su, Y. X., Liao, G. Q., Chen, Z. F., Wang, L., Jiao, P. F., Liu, H. C., Zhong, Y. Q., Zhang, T. H., & Liang, Y. J. (2012). Mandible reconstruction assisted by preoperative virtual surgical simulation. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 113(5), 604–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.016
- Zhu, H., Kang, Y., Shan, X., Ge, Y., & Cai, Z. (2022). Effect of dental rehabilitation on masticatory function following jaw reconstruction. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 37(3), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9337
- Zhu, H., Zhang, L., Cai, Z., & Shan, X. (2019). Dental implant rehabilitation after jaw reconstruction assisted by virtual surgical planning. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 34(5), 1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7278
