Volume 32, Issue 2 pp. 222-232
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study

João Pitta

Corresponding Author

João Pitta

Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, University Clinics for Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Correspondence

João Pitta, Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, University Clinics for Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, 1 Rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Genève 4. Switzerland.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Formal analysis (equal), Funding acquisition (lead), ​Investigation (lead), Methodology (lead), Writing - original draft (lead)

Search for more papers by this author
Jenni Hjerppe

Jenni Hjerppe

Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Helsinki University Hospital (HUH), Helsinki, Finland

Department of Prosthodontics and Stomatognathic physiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

Contribution: Formal analysis (equal), Writing - original draft (lead)

Search for more papers by this author
Felix Burkhardt

Felix Burkhardt

Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, University Clinics for Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Contribution: Data curation (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
Vincent Fehmer

Vincent Fehmer

Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, University Clinics for Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Methodology (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
Philippe Mojon

Philippe Mojon

Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, University Clinics for Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Contribution: Formal analysis (lead), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
Irena Sailer

Irena Sailer

Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, University Clinics for Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Contribution: Conceptualization (lead), Funding acquisition (supporting), Supervision (lead), Writing - review & editing (lead)

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 November 2020
Citations: 32

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate mechanical stability (survival and complication rates) and bending moments of different all-ceramic monolithic restorations bonded to titanium bases (hybrid abutment-crowns) or to customized titanium abutments compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns (PFM) after thermo-mechanical aging.

Material and Methods

Sixty conical connection implants (4.3 mm-diameter) were divided in five groups (n = 12): PFM using gold abutment (GAbut-PFM), lithium disilicate crown bonded to customized titanium abutment (TAbut+LDS), lithium disilicate abutment-crown bonded to titanium base (TiBase+LDS), zirconia abutment-crown bonded to titanium base (TiBase+ZR), polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network (PICN) abutment-crown bonded to titanium base (TiBase+PICN). Simultaneous thermocycling (5°–55°C) and chewing simulation (1,200,000-cycles, 49 N, 1.67 Hz) were applied. Catastrophic and non-catastrophic events were evaluated under light microscope, and survival and complication rates were calculated. Specimens that survived aging were loaded until failure and bending moments were calculated.

Results

Survival rates after aging were 100% (TAbut+LDS, TiBase+LDS), 91.7% (GA-PFM), 66.7% (TiBase+ZR) and 58.3% (TiBase+PICN) and differed among the groups (p = .006). Non-catastrophic events as screw loosening (GA-PFM) and loss of retention or micro-/macro-movement (TiBase groups) were observed. Complication rates varied among the groups (p < .001). TiBase+PICN had lower bending moment than all the other groups (p < .001).

Conclusions

Hybrid abutment-crowns made of lithium disilicate can be an alternative to PFM-based restorations, although concerns regarding the bonded interface between the titanium base and abutment-crown can be raised. PICN and zirconia may not be recommended due to its inferior mechanical and bonding outcomes, respectively. Titanium customized abutment with bonded lithium disilicate crown appears to be the most stable combination.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.