Variations in crestal cortical bone thickness at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone
Yi-Chun Ko
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorHeng-Li Huang
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, 413 Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorYen-Wen Shen
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Department of Dentistry, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorJyun-Yi Cai
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Department of Dentistry, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Lih-Jyh Fuh
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Department of Dentistry, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Correspondence Lih-Jyh Fuh, School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]
(or)
Jui-Ting Hsu, School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jui-Ting Hsu
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, 413 Taiwan
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Correspondence Lih-Jyh Fuh, School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]
(or)
Jui-Ting Hsu, School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYi-Chun Ko
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorHeng-Li Huang
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, 413 Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorYen-Wen Shen
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Department of Dentistry, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorJyun-Yi Cai
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Department of Dentistry, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Lih-Jyh Fuh
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Department of Dentistry, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Correspondence Lih-Jyh Fuh, School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]
(or)
Jui-Ting Hsu, School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jui-Ting Hsu
School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, 404 Taiwan
Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, 413 Taiwan
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Correspondence Lih-Jyh Fuh, School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]
(or)
Jui-Ting Hsu, School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Background
Dental implants have become reliable and predictable tools for treating missing teeth. The survival rate of dental implants is markedly influenced by the host bone quality and quantity of the jawbone. A better host bone provides higher initial stability of the dental implant, resulting in better osseointegration and a higher success rate. Host bone quality and quantity are determined by the crestal cortical bone thickness and inner cancellous bone density.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to determine the crestal cortical bone thickness at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone through the use of dental cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images.
Materials and Methods
A total of 661 dental implant sites (81 in the anterior mandible, 122 in the anterior maxilla, 224 in the posterior mandible, and 234 in the posterior maxilla) were obtained from the jawbones of 173 humans. The data were subjected to statistical analysis to determine any correlation between crestal cortical bone thicknesses and jawbone regions using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post-test.
Results
The crestal cortical bone thicknesses at dental implant sites in the four regions decreased in the following order: posterior mandible (1.07 ± 0.47 mm, mean ± SD) >anterior mandible (0.99 ± 0.36 mm) >anterior maxilla (0.82 ± 0.30 mm) >posterior maxilla (0.75 ± 0.35 mm).
Conclusion
The dental CBCT data demonstrate that crestal cortical bone thickness varies markedly between dental implant sites in the four regions of the jawbone.
REFERENCES
- 1 Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 15: 15–46.
- 2 Schnitman P, Rubenstein JE, Whorle P, DaSilva J, Koch GG. Implants for partial edentulism. J Dent Educ. 1988; 52: 725–736.
- 3 De Cicco V, Barresi M, Fantozzi MPT, Cataldo E, Parisi V, Manzoni D. Oral implant-prostheses: new teeth for a brighter brain. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0148715.
- 4 Hashim D, Cionca N, Courvoisier DS, Mombelli A. A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20: 1403–1417.
- 5 Hsu J-T, Huang H-L, Tsai M-T, Wu AY-J, Tu M-G, Fuh L-J. Effects of the 3D bone-to-implant contact and bone stiffness on the initial stability of a dental implant: micro-CT and resonance frequency analyses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 42: 276–280.
- 6 Huang HL, Chang YY, Lin DJ, Li YF, Chen KT, Hsu JT. Initial stability and bone strain evaluation of the immediately loaded dental implant: an in vitro model study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 691–698.
- 7 Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998; 106: 721–764.
- 8 Geckili O, Bilhan H, Geckili E, Cilingir A, Mumcu E, Bural C. Evaluation of possible prognostic factors for the success, survival, and failure of dental implants. Implant Dent. 2014; 23: 44–50.
- 9 Cakarer S, Selvi F, Can T, et al. Investigation of the risk factors associated with the survival rate of dental implants. Implant Dent. 2014; 23: 328–333.
- 10 de Oliveira RCG, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105: 231–238.
- 11 Fuh LJ, Huang HL, Chen CS, et al. Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 346–351.
- 12 Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 290–297.
- 13 Turkyilmaz I, McGlumphy EA. Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2008; 8: 32.
- 14 Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm T, Tumer C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34: 267–272.
- 15 Al Haffar I, Padilla F, Nefussi R, Kolta S, Foucart JM, Laugier P. Experimental evaluation of bone quality measuring speed of sound in cadaver mandibles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102: 782–791.
- 16 Alamri H, Sadrameli M, Alshalhoob M, Alshehri M. Applications of CBCT in dental practice: a review of the literature. Gen Dent. 2012; 60: 390.
- 17 Drage NA, Palmer RM, Blake G, Wilson R, Crane F, Fogelman I. A comparison of bone mineral density in the spine, hip and jaws of edentulous subjects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18: 496–500.
- 18 Frederiksen NL. Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995; 80: 540–554.
- 19 Gerlach NL, Meijer GJ, Borstlap WA, Bronkhorst EM, Bergé SJ, Maal TJJ. Accuracy of bone surface size and cortical layer thickness measurements using cone beam computerized tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 793–797.
- 20 Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Wada E, Suwa H, Iizuka T. Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgery—clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study. Bone. 2005; 37: 776–780.
- 21 Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Kawakami M, Horita S, Murakami K, Kirita T. Influence of bone parameters on peri-implant bone strain distribution in the posterior mandible. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015; 20: e66.
- 22 Baumgaertel S. Quantitative investigation of palatal bone depth and cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 104–108.
- 23 Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 230–235.
- 24
Deguchi T,
Nasu M,
Murakami K,
Yabuuchi T,
Kamioka H,
Takano-Yamamoto T. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129: 721. e727–721. e712.
10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.026 Google Scholar
- 25 Chun Y, Lim W. Bone density at interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009; 12: 25–32.
- 26 Merheb J, Van Assche N, Coucke W, Jacobs R, Naert I, Quirynen M. Relationship between cortical bone thickness or computerized tomography-derived bone density values and implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 612–617.
- 27 Capparé P, Vinci R, Di Stefano DA, et al. Correlation between initial BIC and the insertion torque/depth integral recorded with an instantaneous torque-measuring implant motor: an in vivo study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: e613–e620.
- 28 Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, Tu MG, Li YF, Chen KT, Huang HL. The effects of cortical bone thickness and trabecular bone strength on noninvasive measures of the implant primary stability using synthetic bone models. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013; 15: 251–261.
- 29 Javed F, Romanos GE. Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19: 1–10.
- 30 Tu MG, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, Lin DJ, Huang HL. Effects of cortical bone thickness and implant length on bone strain and interfacial micromotion in an immediately loaded implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25: 706–714.
- 31 Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: PI Brånemark, GA Zarb, T Albrektsson, eds. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985: 199–209.
- 32 Fanning B. CBCT–the justification process, audit and review of the recent literature. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2011; 57: 256–261.
- 33 Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig. 2006; 10: 1–7.
- 34 Sumer A, Caliskan A, Uzun C, Karoz T, Sumer M, Cankaya S. The evaluation of palatal bone thickness for implant insertion with cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45: 216–220.
- 35 Tsutsumi K, Chikui T, Okamura K, Yoshiura K. Accuracy of linear measurement and the measurement limits of thin objects with cone beam computed tomography: effects of measurement directions and of phantom locations in the fields of view. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26: 91–100.
- 36 Molen AD. Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137: S130–S135.
- 37 Klintström E, Smedby Ö, Moreno R, Brismar TB. Trabecular bone structure parameters from 3D image processing of clinical multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography data. Skeletal Radiol. 2014; 43: 197–204.
- 38 Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, Müller R. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro–computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25: 1468–1486.
- 39 Ye N, Jian F, Xue J, et al. Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 142: 879–887.
- 40 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10: 387–416.
- 41 Artzi Z, Carmeli G, Kozlovsky A. A distinguishable observation between survival and success rate outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in 5–10 years in function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17: 85–93.
- 42 Penarrocha M, Guarinos J, Sanchis J, Balaguer J. A retrospective study (1994-1999) of 441 ITI (r) implants in 114 patients followed-up during an average of 2.3 years. Med Oral. 2001; 7: 144–155.
- 43 Glauser R, Ree A, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, Hammerle CH, Scharer P. Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark implants applied in various jawbone regions: a prospective, 1-year clinical study. Clin implant. Dent Relat Res. 2001; 3: 204–213.