Volume 14, Issue 6 pp. 1149-1156
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Infundibular sparing versus transinfundibular approach to the repair of tetralogy of Fallot

Mary K. Olive MD

Corresponding Author

Mary K. Olive MD

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Congenital Heart Center, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Correspondence

Mary K. Olive, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Congenital Heart Center, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan, 1540 East Medical Center Drive, Floor 11, Room 715-Z, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Charles D. Fraser MD

Charles D. Fraser MD

Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Texas Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, University of Texas Dell Medical School, Dell Children’s Medical Center, Austin, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Shelby Kutty MD

Shelby Kutty MD

Department of Pediatrics, Taussig Congenital Heart Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Emmett D. McKenzie MD

Emmett D. McKenzie MD

Section of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
James M. Hammel MD

James M. Hammel MD

Section of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska

Search for more papers by this author
Rajesh Krishnamurthy MD

Rajesh Krishnamurthy MD

Section of Diagnostic Radiology, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Nicolas A. Dodd BM

Nicolas A. Dodd BM

Section of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Shiraz A. Maskatia MD

Shiraz A. Maskatia MD

Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 January 2020
Citations: 3

Abstract

Introduction

The right ventricular infundibular sparing approach (RVIS) to the repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) avoids a full-thickness ventricular incision, typically utilized in the transinfundibular (TI) method.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, age-matched cohort study of patients who underwent RVIS at Texas Children’s Hospital or TI at Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Nebraska and subsequently underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We compared right ventricular end-diastolic and systolic volumes indexed to body surface area (RVEDVi and RVESVi) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) as primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were indexed left ventricular diastolic and systolic volume (LVEDVi and LVESVi), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), right ventricular (RV) sinus ejection fraction (EF) and RV outflow tract EF (RVOT EF).

Results

Seventy-nine patients were included in the analysis; 40 underwent RVIS and 39 underwent TI repair. None of the patients in the TI repair group had an initial palliation with a systemic to pulmonary arterial shunt compared to seven (18%) in the RVIS group (< .01). There was no appreciable difference in RVEDVi (122 ± 29 cc/m2 vs 130 ± 29 cc/m2, P = .59) or pulmonary regurgitant fraction (40 ± 13 vs 37 ± 18, P = .29) between the RVIS and TI groups. Compared to the TI group, the RVIS group had higher RVEF (54 ± 6% vs 44 ± 9%, < .01), lower RVESV (57 ± 17 cc/m2 vs 67 ± 25 cc/m2, P = .03), higher LVEF (61 ± 11% vs 54 ± 8%, < .01), higher RVOT EF (47 ± 12% vs 41 ± 11%, P = .03), and higher RV sinus EF (56 ± 5% vs 49 ± 6%, < .01)

Conclusions

In this selected cohort, patients who underwent RVIS repair for TOF had higher right and left ventricular ejection fraction compared to those who underwent TI repair.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.