Volume 162, Issue 4 pp. 552-555
correspondence
Free Access

Cyclosporin combined with levamisole for refractory or relapsed severe aplastic anaemia

Yingqi Shao

Yingqi Shao

Severe Aplastic Anaemia Studying Programme, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

These authors contributed equally to this study.Search for more papers by this author
Xingxin Li

Xingxin Li

Severe Aplastic Anaemia Studying Programme, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

These authors contributed equally to this study.Search for more papers by this author
Jun Shi

Jun Shi

Severe Aplastic Anaemia Studying Programme, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

Search for more papers by this author
Meili Ge

Meili Ge

Severe Aplastic Anaemia Studying Programme, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jinbo Huang

Jinbo Huang

Severe Aplastic Anaemia Studying Programme, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

Search for more papers by this author
Zhendong Huang

Zhendong Huang

Severe Aplastic Anaemia Studying Programme, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jing Zhang

Jing Zhang

Severe Aplastic Anaemia Studying Programme, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

Search for more papers by this author
Neng Nie

Neng Nie

Severe Aplastic Anaemia Studying Programme, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yizhou Zheng

Yizhou Zheng

Severe Aplastic Anaemia Studying Programme, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 May 2013
Citations: 8

About one-third of patients with severe aplastic anaemia (SAA) are refractory or relapse after treatment with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) by anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) plus cyclosporin (CSA; Olnes et al, 2012). Allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) could be effective as salvage therapy, but it is difficult to find a suitable donor, limited by the family planning policy in China. Intensification of current IST regimen seems to hit the ceiling (Passweg & Tichelli, 2009). However, patients in developing countries cannot afford the repeated courses of ATG due to the high-costs burden.

A novel IST regimen with a practicable and economical solution would be ideal. Levamisole (LMS), which had been originally designed for anthelminthic applications, has a broad range of immunomodulatory effects (Stevenson et al, 1991). We considered that its immunomodulatory potential had synergetic effects when combined with CSA in refractory or relapsed SAA. We herein conducted a small sample research of 12 refractory and four relapsed SAA patients between July 2008 and August 2012, who were salvaged by CSA alternately combined with LMS (CSA–LMS regimen). All of the patients or legal guardians provided signed informed consent. The research was approved by the Institutional Committee for Medical Care and Safety.

Cyclosporin and LMS were alternately administered every other day. The dose of CSA was 3 mg/kg per day in adults or 5 mg/kg per day in children aged 6–12 years. Oral LMS was alternately administered at the same time with a dose of 150 mg per day in adults or 2·5 mg/kg per day in children (<40 kg) in three divided doses. Both CSA and LMS were continued for 12 months, followed by a slow tapering rate of 25% reduction in dose for every 3–4 months according to response. Short courses of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhuG-CSF), red cell and platelet transfusions were administered as clinically indicated. Criteria for haematological response and clonal evolution were in accordance with our previous reports (Li et al, 2013).

Eleven of the 12 refractory patients were previously treated with one cycle of ATG plus CSA and Patient4 was refractory to two cycles of ATG plus CSA. Of the four relapsed patients, Patient 3 was a CSA-resistant non-SAA who progressed to SAA 36 months after the diagnosis, followed by a matched sibling donor haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); she achieved complete response (CR) 3 months after HSCT, but her blood counts declined while tapering CSA and finally met the criteria of SAA after an Epstein-Barr virus infection. The median interval between relapse and CSA–LMS regimen was 6 (range 3–35) months. The initial clinical characteristics and previous treatments of the cohort of patients are summarized in Table 1. All the patients were transfusion-dependent except Patient 2. Median follow-up for this study was 25 (range 3–53·5) months.

Table 1. Patients' characteristics
UPN Sex Aetiology Age (years) Severity of AA at diagnosis Severity of AA at CSA–LMS Previous treatment Response to initial therapy Time from previous treatment to CSA–LMS (months) Disease duration (months)
1 M Idiopathic 42 VSAA SAA ATG + CSA PR 69 72
2 M Idiopathic 19 VSAA SAA ATG + CSA PR 35 36
3 F Idiopathic 25 NSAA SAA Allo-PBSCT + CSA CR 58 66·5
4 F Idiopathic 10 SAA SAA dATG + CSA NR 15·5 16
5 M Idiopathic 15 VSAA SAA ATG + CSA NR 18 21
6 F Idiopathic 25 SAA SAA ATG + CSA PR 9·5 36
7 M Idiopathic 27 SAA SAA ATG + CSA NR 8 13
8 F Hepatitis 21 VSAA VSAA ATG + CSA NR 6 6
9 F Idiopathic 40 SAA SAA ATG + CSA NR 6 6
10 F Idiopathic 14 NSAA VSAA ATG + CSA NR 9 32
11 M Idiopathic 17 VSAA SAA ATG + CSA NR 6 6
12 M Idiopathic 14 SAA SAA ATG + CSA NR 6 8
13 M Hepatitis 11 VSAA SAA ATG + CSA NR 9 10·5
14 F Idiopathic 15 NSAA VSAA ATG + CSA NR 46 60
15 M Idiopathic 48 SAA SAA ATG + CSA NR 6 6
16 M Idiopathic 16 SAA SAA ATG + CSA NR 12 13
  • UPN, unique patient number; M, male; F, female; AA, aplastic anaemia; SAA, severe aplastic anaemia; VSAA, very severe aplastic anaemia; N-SAA, nonsevere aplastic anaemia; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; dATG, double course of ATG; CSA, ciclosporin; LMS, levamisole; Allo-PBSCT, allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; NR, non-responder.

Of the cohort of 16 patients, 14 were alive at a median follow-up of 28·0 (range 4–53·5) months. Five patients achieved CR and three met the criteria for partial response (PR) at last follow-up, including two relapsed (both achieved CR) and six refractory patients. The median haemoglobin concentration, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelet count of the eight responders at last follow up were 122·5 (range 90–156) g/l, 2·55 × 109/l (range 0·9–3·4 × 109/l) and 99 × 109/l (range 33–142 × 109/l), respectively (Table 2).

Table 2. The pretreatment blood count and outcomes of patients
UPN Pretreatment blood counts Interval to last transfusion (d) Current status Recent blood counts Follow-up (months) Evolution PNH assay (%)
Hb (g/l) ANC (109/l) PLT (109/l) Red cell PLT Hb (g/l) ANC (109/l) PLT (109/l) Pre Post
1 68 0·40 6 NR 38 MDS (−7) GPI-AP (<5) FLAER (<1)
2 77 0·50 20 CR 120 3·40 98 49·5 GPI-AP (<5) FLAER (<1)
3 81 1·00 6 48 CR 145 3·16 100 19 FLAER (<1) FLAER (<1)
4 64 2·04 4 243 427 PR 90 2·58 33 53·5 MDS (+21) GPI-AP (<5) FLAER (<1)
5 54 1·87 14 65 CR 156 3·36 114 43·5 +6 GPI-AP (<5) FLAER (3·72)
6 62 1·23 6 NR 44 GPI-AP (<5) FLAER (<1)
7 63 0·31 12 PBSCT 27 GPI-AP (<5) GPI-AP (<5)
8 57 4·64 11 Died 23 GPI-AP (<5) GPI-AP (<5)
9 40 0·36 14 237 95 CR 125 1·65 142 38 GPI-AP (<5) FLAER (<1)
10 45 0·18 3 NR 6 FLAER (2·47) FLAER (2·73)
11 48 0·28 7 274 103 CR 145 2·52 132 29 GPI-AP (<5) FLAER (<1)
12 45 0·80 15 184 61 PR 90 0·90 60 15 del 13 FLAER (6·10) FLAER (<1)
13 57 0·28 10 NR 4 FLAER (<1) FLAER (<1)
14 64 0·00 4 Died 3 FLAER (16·89)
15 60 0·80 13 71 45 PR 117 1·20 72 9 FLAER (<1) FLAER (<1)
16 55 0·77 5 NR 8 FLAER (<1) FLAER (<1)
  • UPN, unique patient number; Hb, haemoglobin concentration; ANC, absolute neutrophil count: PLT, platelet count; PNH, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria; PBSCT, allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; NR, non-responder; GPI-AP, glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol anchored protein; FLAER, fluorescent aerolysin.
  • a Transfusion-independent.
  • b Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Of the three very severe aplastic anaemia (VSAA) patients, Patient 8 never met criteria for response and died of sepsis 23 months after receiving the CSA–LMS regimen. Patient 14 developed pneumonia before CSA–LMS, her ANC never reached more than 0·2 × 109/l even following the administration of rhuG-CSF, and she died within 3 months after CSA–LMS treatment. Patient 10 was still red cell and platelet transfusion-dependent at last follow-up. Patient 7 acheived transient transfusion independence but relapsed later, and underwent sibling donor HSCT 27 months after CSA–LMS regimen. The other four non-responders were still transfusion-dependent.

Cyclosporin–Levamisole-associated toxicity was mild and required neither intervention or discontinuation of these drugs. Patients 1 and 4 progressed to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) 29 and 40 months after CSA–LMS regimen. Patients 5 and 12 developed cytogenetic clonal changes without the distinctive morphological features of MDS; but the abnormal clone (trisomy 6) disappeared in Patient 5 after he achieved CR. To date, no patient developed overt paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH). Three patients had a PNH clone at time of study entry (Table 2). The PNH clone of Patient 12 disappeared after he achieved PR. A new PNH clone was observed in a CR patient (Patient 5) 10 months after CSA–LMS regimen.

A second course of ATG lead to responses of 22–77% in refractory SAA patients and 47·1–65% in relapsed SAA patients (Tichelli et al, 1998; Di Bona et al, 1999; Scheinberg et al, 2006; Kosaka et al, 2008). High dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX) provided a response rate of 48% in refractory patients (Brodsky et al, 2010). Most refractory and relapsed SAA patients from poor regions in China have little access to further courses of ATG, salvage HD-CTX, or HSCT because they lack human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings, or fully HLA-matched unrelated donors or health insurance.

Herein, these concerns have motivated a search for alternative therapy for SAA. Our study underscored the importance of excellent outcomes of refractory and relapsed SAA patients (50·0%) achieved by this novel immunosuppressive strategy. More importantly, in comparison to standard ATG + CSA, our strategy was less expensive, easier to administer and well tolerated. Clonal evolution occurred in 10–15% of AA patients overall, and the clonal progression was mostly seen in non-responders (Young et al, 2006). In this series, two patients developed MDS; both of them were long-term survivors with abnormal haematopoiesis. Interestingly, both the abnormal cytogenetic clone in a patient with CR (Patient 5) and the PNH clone of Patient 12 disappeared during follow-up.

In conclusion, the CSA–LMS regimen represents a promising strategy for refractory or relapsed SAA patients. Importantly, this oral regimen was well tolerated and inexpensive, suggesting that it could be reserved as a third-line choice for patients, especially those in developing countries not eligible for HSCT, repeated ATG or HD-CTX.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Robert A. Brodsky (The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine) for critical revision of the manuscript, important intellectual content and interesting scientific discussions. This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2012N05). We thank the nursing staff of Severe Aplastic Anaemia Studying Programme and our physician colleagues for the excellent care of patients.

    Author contributions

    YZ was the principal investigator and takes primary responsibility for this study. YS, XL and YZ designed the research study. YS, XL and JS performed the research and analysed the data. MG, JH, ZH, JZ and NN coordinated the research. YS, XL, JS and YZ wrote the paper.

    Conflict of interest

    The authors declared that they have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this manuscript.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.