Volume 187, Issue S1 p. 133
Abstract
Free Access

CD02: Is it time to patch test methylisothiazolinone (MI) and methylchloroisothiazolinone/MI mix in petrolatum? A concerning recent rise in sensitization also revealed

First published: 05 July 2022

Catherine Holden and Ruth Sabroe

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK

We wanted to test the hypothesis that patch testing to methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/methylisothiazolinone (MI) mix 0·02% in petrolatum (pet.) and MI 0·2% pet. is more sensitive than the same concentrations in aqueous (aq.). In 2021 these were added to an extended baseline series. Our results were startling. Regarding MI 0·2%, of 180 people tested in pet. 20·0% were positive (+/++/+++) vs. 11·4% of 236 tested in aq. Of 176 tested concurrently, 23% (n = 40) had positive reactions, of which 45% (n = 18) only in pet., 42·5% (n = 17) in both and 12·5% (n = 5) only in aq. Regarding MCI/MI 0·02%, of 127 people tested in pet. 12·6% were positive vs. 3·9% of 233 tested in aq. Of 120 tested concurrently, 13·3% (n = 16) had positive reactions, of which 62·5% (n = 10) only in pet., 31·2% (n = 5) in both and 6·3% (n = 1) only in aq., although the latter was positive to MI in aq. and pet., so would have been identified. Current relevance was found in 88·9% and 81·2% tested to MCI/MI in aq. and pet., 77·8% and 86·1% to MI in aq. and pet. In total, 120 people were tested concurrently to MCI/MI 0·02% aq. and pet., MI 0·2% aq. and pet., benzisothiazolinone (BIT) 0·1% pet. and octylisothiazolinone (OIT) 0·1% pet. Thirty-six (30%) were positive to one or more isothiazolinone, 28 (23·3%) to one or more MCI/MI or MI preparation. Fourteen (11·7%) were positive to one preparation only of which 35·7% (n = 5) to MI 0·2% pet., 7·1% (n = 1) to MI 0·2% aq. and 57·1% (n = 8) to BIT. One person was positive to all six haptens, this being the only person positive to OIT. Our data also show that there may be a new increase in sensitization to MI ± MCI. Rates of sensitization to MI tested in aq. were 18·0%, 6·0%, 8·1% and 11·4%, in 2015, 2018, 2020 and 2021, respectively, but rising to 20·0% in 2021 when tested in pet. We found a similar trend for MCI/MI in aq. (13·5%, 2·9%, 3·1% and 3·9% for the same years) rising to 12·6% in 2021 in pet. However, in 2020 and 2021 we tested only people with severe disease (due to COVID-19 restrictions), so the rates may be falsely high. Reassuringly, rates to BIT and OIT were relatively stable during this time-frame (BIT: 10·8%, 16·0% and 13·5% in 2015, 2019 and 2021, respectively; OIT: 1·7%, 2·9% and 0·9%, in 2015, 2019 and 2021, respectively). In summary, 62·5% and 45% of people positive to MCI/MI and MI, respectively, would have been missed if patch tested to these haptens in aqueous alone. We recommend testing in petrolatum. We also found a concerning rise in sensitization to MCI/MI and MI.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.