Volume 185, Issue S1 p. 11
Abstract
Free Access

O07: Efficacy of abrocitinib monotherapy in patients with prior exposure to systemic treatments: pooled results from the JADE MONO-1 and JADE MONO-2 studies

First published: 06 July 2021

M. Ameen,1 W. Sin Chiu,2 R. Rojo,3 P. Biswas,4 W. Romero2 and M. Ardern-Jones 5

1Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, UK; 2Pfizer Inc., Surrey, UK; 3Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA; 4Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA; 5Clinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Effective options for previously treated moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) are needed. Monotherapy of abrocitinib, an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase 1 selective inhibitor, was shown to be effective and safe for moderate-to-severe AD in two phase III trials [JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060) and JADE MONO-2 (NCT03575871)]. In this post-hoc analysis of pooled data from the aforementioned studies, we investigated the efficacy of abrocitinib monotherapy (200 mg or 100 mg) or placebo in patients aged ≥ 12 years previously exposed to systemic therapies (except systemic corticosteroids), including dupilumab. Response was evaluated at week 12 using Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) response [clear (0) or almost clear (1) with ≥ 2 points improvement], a ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75), and a composite of ≥ 50% improvement in EASI (EASI 50) and ≥ 4-point improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Of 778 patients, 26·0% had received prior systemic agents, including ciclosporin (12·7%), other nonbiologics (i.e. methotrexate, azathioprine and mycophenolate; 9·3%) and dupilumab (5·7%). At week 12, more patients exposed to prior systemic treatment who received abrocitinib 200 mg or 100 mg achieved IGA 0/1 (37·5% and 17·9%, respectively), EASI 75 (59·2% and 32·1%, respectively) and the EASI 50/DLQI composite response (72·6% and 47·3%, respectively) than placebo-treated patients (2·4%, 9·5%, and 9·1%, respectively; Table 1). Some patients who had an unsatisfactory response to ciclosporin or dupilumab achieved disease improvement with abrocitinib, with the 200-mg dose more effective than 100-mg one.

Funding sources: this study was sponsored by Pfizer.

Table 1. Proportions of patients achieving response.
Response Abrocitinib Placebo
200 mg 100 mg
n (%) 95% CI P-value n (%) 95% CI P-value n (%) 95% CI
IGA 0/1
Previously exposed to systemic agent 27/72 (38) 26·3–48·7 < 0·001 15/84 (18) 9·7–26·0 0·001 1/42 (2) 0·0–7·0
Previously failed ciclosporin 14/37 (38) 22·2–53·5 0·002 3/36 (8) 0·0–17·4 0·83 1/15 (7) 0·0–19·3
Previously failed dupilumab 2/6 (33) 0·0–71·1 0·083 1/7 (14) 0·0–40·2 0·280 0 0·0–60·2
EASI 75
Previously exposed to systemic agent 42/71 (59) 47·7–70·6 < 0·001 27/84 (32) 22·2–42·1 < 0·001 4/42 (10) 0·6–18·4
Previously failed ciclosporin 21/37 (57) 40·8–72·7 < 0·001 7/36 (19) 6·5–32·4 0·166 1/15 (7) 0·0–19·3
Previously failed dupilumab 3/6 (50) 10·0–90·0 0·014 2/7 (29) 0·0–62·0 0·094 0 0·0–60·2
EASI 50 and DLQI ≥ 4-point improvement
Previously exposed to systemic agent 45/62 (73) 61·5–83·7 < 0·001 35/74 (47) 35·9–58·7 < 0·001 3/33 (9) 0·0–18·9
Previously failed ciclosporin 23/34 (68) 51·9–83·4 < 0·001 12/31 (39) 21·6–55·9 0·016 1/11 (9) 0·0–26·1
Previously failed dupilumab

4/6 (67)

28·9–100·0 0·317 2/7 (29) 0·0–62·0 0·882 1/3 (33) 0·0–86·7
  • P-values refer to comparison vs. placebo.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.