The utility of optical coherence tomography for diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma: a quantitative review
Plain language summary available online
Summary
Background
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a noninvasive near-infrared light imaging technology that can be utilized to diagnose basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) based on specific morphological features.
Objectives
To conduct a quantitative review using tumour-level data from published studies to assess: (i) the in vivo diagnostic accuracy of different OCT systems; (ii) correlation between OCT features and histopathological diagnosis; and (iii) factors that impact the accuracy of tumour depth estimation.
Methods
Primary tumour-level data were extracted from published studies on the use of time-domain (TD-OCT), frequency-domain (FD-OCT) and high-definition (HD-OCT) systems for diagnosis of BCCs. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of BCC, prevalence of morphological features and correlation of tumour depth between OCT and histopathology were analysed.
Results
In total, 901 BCCs from 31 studies were included. The sensitivity and specificity were 89·3% and 60·3% overall, and were highest for FD-OCT (93·7% and 61·4%, respectively). The most prevalent morphological features were lobular pattern (80·2%, 315 of 393 tumours) and hyper-reflective peritumoral stroma (51·7%, 203 of 393). Concordance between OCT and histopathological tumour depth categories was moderate (Pearson coefficient 0·48); it was highest for tumours < 1 mm and those on the extremities. The overall bias was 0·075 mm with an agreement range from −0·88 to 1·03 mm. HD-OCT and FD-OCT were superior to TD-OCT at identifying morphological features, but not at tumour depth estimation.
Conclusions
OCT is a viable tool for in vivo diagnosis of BCCs. FD-OCT and HD-OCT outperformed TD-OCT in diagnostic accuracy and detection of morphological features, but not tumour depth estimation.
