Histopathological and immunophenotypical criteria for the diagnosis of Sézary syndrome in differentiation from other erythrodermic skin diseases: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force Study of 97 cases
Wilhelm Sander Stiftung (C. Assaf, Förderprojekt no. 2011.066.1).
None declared.
Summary
Background
Patients with erythrodermic disease are a diagnostic challenge regarding the clinical and histological differential diagnosis.
Objectives
To evaluate histopathological and immunohistochemical diagnostic markers for Sézary syndrome.
Methods
Ninety-seven erythrodermic cases [Sézary syndrome (SS), n = 57; erythrodermic inflammatory dermatoses (EIDs), n = 40] were collected by the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Task Force histopathology group. Evaluation criteria were (i) epidermal and dermal changes; (ii) morphology of the infiltrate; (iii) immunohistochemical analysis of marker loss (CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5 and CD7); (iv) bystander infiltrate by staining for CD8, FOXP3 and CD25; and (v) expression of Ki-67, CD30, PD-1 and MUM-1.
Results
The workshop panel made a correct diagnosis of SS in 51% of cases (cutaneous T-cell lymphoma 81%) and of EID in 80% without clinical or laboratory data. Histology revealed a significantly increased degree of epidermotropism (P < 0·001) and more intraepidermal atypical lymphocytes (P = 0·0014) in SS biopsies compared with EID. Pautrier microabscesses were seen only in SS (23%) and not in EID (P = 0·0012). SS showed significantly more dermal cerebriform and blastic lymphocytes than EID. Immunohistochemistry revealed a significant loss of CD7 expression (< 50%) in 33 of 51 (65%) cases of SS compared with two of 35 (6%) EID (P < 0·001). The lymphocytic infiltrate in SS skin samples was found significantly to express PD-1 (P = 0·0053), MUM-1 (P = 0·0017) and Ki-67 (P < 0·001), and showed less infiltration of CD8+ lymphocytes (P < 0·001). A multivariate analysis identified CD7 loss, increased numbers of small cerebriform lymphocytes, low numbers of CD8+ lymphocytes and increased proliferation (Ki-67+ lymphocytes) as the strongest indicators for the diagnosis of SS.
Conclusions
A number of different histological and immunophenotypical criteria are required to differentiate between SS and EIDs.