Volume 173, Issue 1 pp. 123-127
Dermatological Surgery and Lasers

Additional review of Mohs slides to optimize Mohs micrographic surgery

C.B. van Lee

Corresponding Author

C.B. van Lee

Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Correspondence

Charlotte Barbara van Lee.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
B. Graafland

B. Graafland

Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
S. Koljenović

S. Koljenović

Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
H.A.M. Neumann

H.A.M. Neumann

Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
K. Nasserinejad

K. Nasserinejad

Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
T.E.C. Nijsten

T.E.C. Nijsten

Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
R.R. van den Bos

R.R. van den Bos

Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
K. Munte

K. Munte

Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 February 2015
Citations: 12

Funding sources:

None.

Conflicts of interest:

None declared.

The preliminary results of this study were presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Dubrovnik, Croatia, August 2013. A poster was presented at the XV World Congress on Cancers of the Skin, Edinburgh, U.K., September 2014.

Summary

Background

One significant risk factor for recurrence after Mohs surgery is misinterpretation of slides.

Objectives

To determine how often pathologists detected incompletely excised basal cell carcinoma (BCC) on Mohs slides and to determine risk factors for incompletely excised BCCs.

Methods

This retrospective study included 1653 BCCs treated with Mohs surgery in a university hospital between 2007 and 2011. For routine quality assurance, all slides were additionally reviewed by a pathologist within 1 week of the procedure. For this study, all cases that had divergent interpretations were re-evaluated by a Mohs surgeon and a pathologist. Mixed-effects logistic regression models with Mohs surgeon effects as random effects were used to determine risk factors for incompletely excised BCC.

Results

Incompletely excised BCCs were detected in 31 cases (2%), in which defects > 20 mm in diameter were an independent risk factor (odds ratio 3·58, 95% confidence interval 1·55–8·28). Other studied variables (i.e. aggressive subtype, previously treated BCC, location on nose and > 2 Mohs stages) did not affect the risk of incompletely excised BCCs.

Conclusions

The additional review of Mohs slides might increase accurate interpretation, especially in large BCCs.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.