We present a general method for estimating the effect of a treatment on an ordinal outcome in randomized trials. The method is robust in that it does not rely on the proportional odds assumption. Our estimator leverages information in prognostic baseline variables, and has all of the following properties: (i) it is consistent; (ii) it is locally efficient; (iii) it is guaranteed to have equal or better asymptotic precision than both the inverse probability-weighted and the unadjusted estimators. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first estimator of the causal relation between a treatment and an ordinal outcome to satisfy these properties. We demonstrate the estimator in simulations based on resampling from a completed randomized clinical trial of a new treatment for stroke; we show potential gains of up to 39% in relative efficiency compared to the unadjusted estimator. The proposed estimator could be a useful tool for analyzing randomized trials with ordinal outcomes, since existing methods either rely on model assumptions that are untenable in many practical applications, or lack the efficiency properties of the proposed estimator. We provide R code implementing the estimator.

Supporting Information

References

Abdu, E., Hanley, D. F., and Newell, D. W. (2012). Minimally invasive treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosurgical Focus 32, E3.
10.3171/2012.1.FOCUS11362
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Bang, H. and Robins, J. M. (2005). Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics 61, 962–973.
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Brott, T., Adams, H., Olinger, C., Marler, J., Barsan, W., Biller, J., et al. (1989). Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke 20, 864–70.
10.1161/01.STR.20.7.864
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Cao, W., Tsiatis, A. A., and Davidian, M. (2009). Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data. Biometrika 96, 723–734.
10.1093/biomet/asp033
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 171–185.
10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Gruber, S. and van der Laan, M. J. (2012). Targeted minimum loss based estimator that outperforms a given estimator. The International Journal of Biostatistics 8, 1–22.
10.1515/1557-4679.1332
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Horvitz, D. G. and Thompson, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47, 663–685.
10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Moore, K. L. and van der Laan, M. J. (2009). Covariate adjustment in randomized trials with binary outcomes: Targeted maximum likelihood estimation. Statistics in Medicine 28, 39–64.
10.1002/sim.3445
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Neugebauer, R. and van der Laan, M. J. (2007). Nonparametric causal effects based on marginal structural models. Journal of Statistical Planning & Inference 137, 419–434.
10.1016/j.jspi.2005.12.008
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Robins, J. (2000). Robust estimation in sequentially ignorable missing data and causal inference models. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Section on Bayesian Statistical Science 1999, 6–10, Alexandria, Virginia: American Statistical Association..
Google Scholar
Robins, J. and Rotnitzky, A. (1992). Recovery of information and adjustment for dependent censoring using surrogate markers. In AIDS Epidemiology, Methodological issues, 297–331. Boston, Massachusetts: Birkhäuser.
Google Scholar
Robins, J., Rotnitzky, A., and Zhao, L. (1994). Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 846–866.
10.1080/01621459.1994.10476818
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Rotnitzky, A., Lei, Q., Sued, M., and Robins, J. M. (2012). Improved double-robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrika 99, 439–456.
10.1093/biomet/ass013
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
Scharfstein, D. O., Rotnitzky, A., and Robins, J. M. (1999). Adjusting for nonignorable drop-out using semiparametric nonresponse models: Rejoinder. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94, 1135–1146.
Google Scholar
Shen, C., Li, X., and Li, L. (2014). Inverse probability weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized studies. Statistics in Medicine 33, 555–568.
10.1002/sim.5969
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Stitelman, O. M., De Gruttola, V., and van der Laan, M. J. (2011). A general implementation of tmle for longitudinal data applied to causal inference in survival analysis. The International Journal of Biostatistics 8, 1.
Google Scholar
Tan, Z. (2006). A distributional approach for causal inference using propensity scores. Journal of the American Statistical Association 101, 1619–1637.
10.1198/016214506000000023
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
Tan, Z. (2010). Bounded, efficient and doubly robust estimation with inverse weighting. Biometrika 97, 661–682.
10.1093/biomet/asq035
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Tsiatis, A. A., Davidian, M., Zhang, M., and Lu, X. (2008). Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: A principled yet flexible approach. Statistics in Medicine 27, 4658–4677.
10.1002/sim.3113
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
van der Laan, M. and Rubin, D. (2006). Targeted maximum likelihood learning. The International Journal of Biostatistics 2, Article 11.
10.2202/1557-4679.1043
Google Scholar
Wang, L., Rotnitzky, A., and Lin, X. (2010). Nonparametric regression with missing outcomes using weighted kernel estimating equations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105, 1135–1146.
10.1198/jasa.2010.tm08463
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Tsiatis, A. A., and Davidian, M. (2008). Improving efficiency of inferences in randomized clinical trials using auxiliary covariates. Biometrics 64, 707–715.
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00976.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume72, Issue2

June 2016

Pages 422-431

Filename	Description
biom12450-sup-0001-SuppData-S1.pdf215.7 KB	Supplementary Materials.
biom12450-sup-0002-SuppData-S2.zip17.4 KB	Supplementary Materials Code.

Enhanced precision in the analysis of randomized trials with ordinal outcomes

Summary

Supporting Information

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Enhanced precision in the analysis of randomized trials with ordinal outcomes

Summary

Supporting Information

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information