Volume 114, Issue 1 pp. 58-68
Short Research Article
Full Access

The influence of life history and climate driven diversification on the mtDNA phylogeographic structures of two southern African Mastomys species (Rodentia: Muridae: Murinae)

Arthur F. Sands

Arthur F. Sands

Evolutionary Genomics Group, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Sonja Matthee

Sonja Matthee

Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
John K. E. Mfune

John K. E. Mfune

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia

Search for more papers by this author
Conrad A. Matthee

Corresponding Author

Conrad A. Matthee

Evolutionary Genomics Group, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602 South Africa

Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 October 2014
Citations: 2

Abstract

The phylogeographic patterns of small mammals in southern Africa are frequently disjunct. This pattern is predominately attributed to vicariant geographical barriers coupled to climate driven diversification. To gain further insights into this hypothesis, we embarked on a comparative mtDNA phylogeographic study of two common rodent species in southern Africa, Mastomys natalensis and Mastomys coucha. Parsimony haplotype networks and SplitsTrees of mtDNA cytochrome oxidase I data showed a large degree of haplotype sharing throughout the sampling range. Within southern Africa, we found no conclusive evidence to support geographic vicariance as a contributing factor towards Mastomys speciation. We proposed that the regional phylogeographic structures detected for M. natalensis and M. coucha are the result of weak isolation by distance coupled to repeated expansions and contractions of suitable habitat. Both species probably survived in multiple refugia during unfavourable periods and mismatch distributions show signs of population expansion. Mitochondrial DNA nucleotide diversity values (π) show marked differences between the two species (M. natalensis: 0.003 and M. coucha: 0.468), and M. coucha also shows a higher level of population differentiation in AMOVA analyses. These differences are most likely due to life history discrepancies between the two species. Mastomys coucha is regarded to be more of a habitat specialist when compared to M. natalensis, and this probably places a higher constraint on M. coucha dispersal abilities. © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 114, 58–68.

Introduction

Geographically widespread mammal species often have disjunct phylogeographic patterns that are closely linked with paleoecology (Randi, 2007). This scenario is also evident in glaciation-free regions such as Africa (Arctander, Johansen & Coutellec-Vreto, 1999), and was recently corroborated in a study on a broad niche murid rodent, Mastomys natalensis (Colangelo et al., 2013). Six unique geographically defined M. natalensis haplogroups were identified and it was proposed that the structure obtained is the result of habitat vicariance and climate driven diversification. If this holds, we propose that the evolution of Mastomys coucha, an ecologically and morphologically closely related species to M. natalensis (see below), may similarly be affected by these factors. It is, however, well established that life history of species (amongst others, the ability to disperse, the reproduction potential, and habitat specificity) also affects the genetic structure of taxa (Hodges, Rowell & Keogh, 2007; Pelc, Warner & Gaines, 2009; Puritz et al., 2012; Cangi et al., 2013; du Toit, Matthee & Matthee, 2013). Accurate predictions on the phylogeographic patterns of many un-studied species are thus purely speculative.

In southern Africa, the distribution of M. coucha is characterized by three disjunct centres of endemism (Fig. 1). The reason for the disjunct distribution in M. coucha is not apparent, but several contemporary vicariant barriers occur in the southern African landscape. It is likely that these could have influenced connectivity among multimammate mice populations. In particular, the Orange river (Matthee & Flemming, 2002; Bauer & Lamb, 2005; du Toit et al., 2012, 2013), the Zambezi river (Cotterill, 2004; Faulkes et al., 2004; Van Daele et al., 2004, 2007), altitudinal differences associated with the Great Escarpment (Matthee & Robinson, 1996; Edwards et al., 2011; Schwab et al., 2011; du Toit et al., 2012), and high rainfall variability between the wet eastern and dryer western regions (Rambau, Robinson & Stanyon, 2003; Linder et al., 2010; du Toit et al., 2012; Montgelard & Matthee, 2012; Willows-Munro & Matthee, 2011) could have all influenced the phylogeographic structure of M. coucha (Fig. 1). In addition to these influences, climatic oscillations are also regularly put forward as contributing factor for the diversification of mammals in southern Africa (Matthee & Robinson, 1996; Russo, Chimimba & Bloomer, 2010; Engelbrecht et al., 2011; du Toit et al., 2012; Montgelard & Matthee, 2012).

figure

The approximate distribution of M. coucha (Yellow) and M. natalensis (Red) as in accordance with the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN, 2013). The letters ‘A-O’ represent the southern African sampling localities and M. natalensis is indicated by A = East London, B = Albert Falls, C = Kavango Region, D = Lusaka, E = Banamaiya, F = Kabulamwanda, G = Kantengwa, H = Katoshi while M. coucha is represented by I = Grootfontein, J = Mariental, K = Otjiwarongo, L = Okahandja, M = Kaalplaas, N = Mooinooi, O = Rietvlei. Locality names correspond to those in Table 1.

To test the prediction that vicariance and climatic changes are important mechanisms in shaping the evolution of M. coucha, we embarked on a regional study in which samples were obtained from various localities spanning the known listed biogeographic barriers in southern Africa (see Fig. 1). In addition, to test the effect of life history on evolutionary patterns, we also included representatives of M. natalensis sampled from the same region. The two Mastomys species differ in chromosome number (Granjon et al., 1997 and references therein) and in isozymes and allozymes (Smit & van der Bank, 2001). They are, however, virtually identical in external appearances and they also overlap partly in their distribution (Fig. 1). The distribution of M. natalensis, however, may be influenced by the presence of M. coucha through interspecific competition (Taylor, 1998; Jackson & van Aarde, 2004) and M. natalensis rodents tend to be more abundant in areas of greater rainfall (Taylor, 1998). Mastomys natalensis rodents also have lower population densities at high altitudes (and appear to be totally absent above 2100 m: Kingdon, 1974; Venturi et al., 2004; Makundi, Massawe & Mulungu, 2007) and circumstantial evidence suggest that the two species differ in their reproductive abilities. Population numbers of M. natalensis are highly fluctuating (Leirs, 1994; Venturi et al., 2004; Skinner & Chimimba, 2005; Makundi et al., 2007), while they tend to be more stable for M. coucha (Jackson & van Aarde, 2004).

By studying the comparative phylogeography of two closely related Mastomys species we aimed to provide additional insights into the role of life history, vicariance and climate-driven diversification in the region. Considering the conclusions reached by Colangelo et al. (2013) we hypothesized that the geographic genetic pattern of both Mastomys species might similarly be affected by vicariance and climatic instability in southern Africa.

Material and Methods

Sampling

In total, 91 M. coucha and 135 M. natalensis rodents were analysed and these predominantly represented individuals derived from localities across South Africa, Namibia and Zambia (Table 1). Newly sampled individuals (N = 130) were trapped using Sherman-type live traps as described in du Toit et al. (2012). Individuals were euthanized using an intra-peritoneal injection of sodium pentobarbitone (200 mg kg−1; Stellenbosch University Ethical Clearance 2006B01007 and SU-ACUM11-00004; Namibian MET permits 1572/2011 and 1666/2012).

Table 1. Sampling localities for M. natalensis and M. coucha included in the present study. Locality names for southern African sampling localities correspond to those in Fig. 1
Species Location Region No. samples GenBank accession numbers
Mastomys natalensis East London SA South Africa 6 KJ466191
Albert Falls SA South Africa 15 KJ466183; KJ466192; KJ466193
Chelmsford Nature Reserve SA South Africa 3 KJ466190
Richards Bay SA South Africa 1 JQ667816.1
Inkunzi Lodge SA South Africa 4 KJ466189
Vryheid SA South Africa 4 KJ466184; KJ466194; KJ466195
Transvaal SA South Africa 2 JQ667824.1; JQ667823.1
Kavango Region NAM Namibia 15 KJ466185; KJ466186; KJ466187; KJ466188
Etund Irrigation Scheme NAM Namibia 1 JQ667822.1
Popa Falls Resort NAM Namibia 1 JQ667820.1
Omatako-Kavangotto Rivers NAM Namibia 1 JQ667819.1
Namutoni Etosha NAM Namibia 1 JQ667821.1
Zimbabwe Zambezian Region 1 JQ667807.1
Lusaka ZAM Zambezian Region 15 AB752648.1; AB752630.1; AB752587.1; AB752578.1; AB752657.1; AB752544.1; AB752627.1; AB752619.1; AB752611.1; AB752598.1; AB752588.1; AB752575.1; AB752572.1; AB752561.1; AB752550.1
Banamaiya ZAM Zambezian Region 15 AB752760.2; AB752754.1; AB752758.2; AB752763.2; AB752746.1; AB752755.1; AB752753.1; AB752752.1; AB752739.1; AB752737.1; AB752735.1; AB752733.1; AB752731.1; AB752718.1; AB752757.2
Kabulamwanda ZAM Zambezian Region 9 AB752683.1; AB752677.1; AB752681.1; AB752675.1; AB752674.1; AB752704.1; AB752702.1; AB752765.1; AB752671.1
Katoshi ZAM Zambezian Region 6 AB752668.1; AB752667.1; AB752669.1; AB752662.1; AB752660.1; AB752658.1
Kantengwa ZAM Zambezian Region 10 AB752699.1; AB752695.1; AB752693.1; AB752689.1; AB752775.1; AB752684.1; AB752685.1; AB752633.1; AB752774.1; AB752773.1
Leopard Hill ZAM Zambezian Region 2 AB752581.1; AB752583.1
Maala ZAM Zambezian Region 2 AB752714.1; AB752712.1
Malawi East Africa 1 JQ667811.1
Mozambique East Africa 1 JQ667817.1
Msimba TAN East Africa 1 JQ667813.1
Mbouambe Lefini CONG Central Africa 2 JQ667836.1; JQ667835.1
Ngotto CAR Central Africa 3 JQ667829.1; JQ667830.1; JQ667831.1
Bambio CAR Central Africa 1 JQ667832.1
Moloukou CAR Central Africa 2 JQ667833.1; JQ667834.1
Zera CAM Central Africa 1 JQ667815.1
Bol CHAD Central Africa 2 JQ667809.1; JQ667810.1
Niamey NIGER North-West Africa 1 JQ667818.1
Doyissa BEN North-West Africa 1 JQ667814.1
Kalifabeugou MALI North-West Africa 1 JQ667808.1
Kazaouma GUI North-West Africa 2 JQ667827.1; JQ667828.1
Malweta GUI North-West Africa 1 JQ667826.1
Senegal North-West Africa 1 JQ667812.1
Mastomys coucha Grootfontein NAM Namibia 13 KJ466152; KJ466153; KJ466154; KJ466155; KJ466156; KJ466157; KJ466158;
Mariental NAM Namibia 6 KJ466180; KJ466181
Otjiwarongo NAM Namibia 7 KJ466170; KJ466171; KJ466172; KJ466173; KJ466174
Okahandja NAM Namibia 14 KJ466159; KJ466160
Uniab River mouth NAM Namibia 1 JQ667766.1
Waterberg Plateau Park NAM Namibia 2 JQ667768.1; JQ667769.1
Omatjene Research Station NAM Namibia 1 JQ667770.1
Windhoek NAM Namibia 1 JQ667771.1
Rietvlei SA South Africa 15 KJ466161; KJ466162; KJ466163; KJ466164; KJ466165
Chelmsford Nature Reserve SA South Africa 1 KJ466182
Bloemfontein SA South Africa 1 JQ667767.1
Kaalplaas SA South Africa 14 KJ466175; KJ466176; KJ466177; KJ466178; KJ466179
Mooinooi SA South Africa 15 KJ466166; KJ466167; KJ466168; KJ466169

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

Total genomic DNA was isolated from tissue samples using the CTAB manual extraction technique (Winnepenninckx, Backeljau & De Wachter, 1993). Initial sequences of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) were generated using the published universal COI primers LCO 1490 and HCO1 2198 (Folmer et al., 1994). To optimize amplification, genus specific primers were also designed (MastFCO1 5′-TATTTGGCGCATGAGCAGGA-3′ and MastRCO1 5′-CCTCCTGCAGGGTCAAAGAAA-3) using Primer 3 software (Ye et al., 2012). Amplification was performed in a GeneAmp PCR 2700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems). PCR cycling conditions included an initial denaturation of 5 min at 94 °C followed by 35–40 cycles of 30 s denaturation at 94 °C, 45 s annealing at 55.5 °C and 60 s extension at 72 °C. The reaction was ended by a final extension period of 7–10 min at 72 °C.

Aliquots of all PCR products were first confirmed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by BigDye Chemistry sequencing and analyses on an ABI 3730 XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The sequences were visualized using BioEdit v7.1.3.0 (Hall, 1999), and where necessary, manually corrected. Alignments were performed in BioEdit's ClustalW Multiple Alignment tool (Thompson, Higgins & Gibson, 1994) and authenticity of the gene fragment was confirmed by screening for stop codons.

Phylogeographic analysis

Haplotypic diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (π) and an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA; Excoffier, Smouse & Quattro, 1992) was performed in Arlequin 3.5.1.2 (Excoffier & Lischer, 2010). The a priori AMOVA assumptions were set to test for population differentiation between sampling sites (only sample sites where more than five individuals were sampled were included for this analysis). All pairwise Φst values were subjected to Holm's sequential Bonferroni corrections (Dunn, 1961; Holm, 1979). In addition, isolation by distance (IBD) (Wright, 1943) between southern African sampling localities where more than five individuals were sampled was also analysed in GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall & Smouse, 2006, 2012) by making use of the Mantel test. The latter was based on a Pearson's correlation test, using linear regression between Φst values and straight distances among sampling localities (using global positioning system (GPS) coordinates (see Table S1)).

To depict the evolutionary relationships among the mtDNA haplotypes, TCS 1.21 (Clement, Posada & Crandall, 2000) was used to generate statistical haplotype networks with 95% confidence. SplitsTree 4.13.1 (Huson & Bryant, 2006) was used to construct Neighbour-Net (Bryant & Moulton, 2004) phylogenetic networks. To test for population expansion events following bottlenecks (possibly related to past climatic changes), Fu's Fs (Fu, 1997) values were calculated followed by a mismatch distribution (Harpending et al., 1998) using Arlequin 3.5.1.2 software (using a 1000 replicates of the parametric bootstrap method; Schneider & Excoffier, 1999; Excoffier & Lischer, 2010). To provide a temporal perspective on population demographics, Bayesian Skyline Plots (Drummond et al., 2005) were constructed in BEAST 1.7.5 (Drummond et al., 2012) and Tracer 1.5 (Rambaut & Drummond, 2007). We employed a rate of approximately 1% per million years (also see du Toit et al., 2013) and a normally distributed prior distribution. jModelTest 0.1.1 (Guindon & Gascuel, 2003; Posada, 2008) was used to determine the best-fit prior model of sequence evolution using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) (Akaike, 1973). Early runs were evaluated in Tracer 1.5 (Rambaut & Drummond, 2007) to optimize run-time parameters and the final MCMC simulation ran for 100 000 000 generations, sampling every 10 000 generations.

Results

Within southern Africa, we detected 13 new unique haplotypes for M. natalensis and 24 for M. coucha (a total of 545 bp were analysed; GenBank accession numbers: M. coucha: KJ466152 – KJ466182 and M. natalensis: KJ466183 – KJ466195). Haplotypic diversity (h) values were generally high, but when the two species were compared, it was lower for M. natalensis (h = 0.715) when compared with M. coucha (h = 0.849). Nucleotide diversity (π) show marked differences between the two species, with M. natalensis much lower (π = 0.003) than M. coucha (π = 0.468). Although the AMOVA analyses indicated lower levels of population differentiation for M. natalensis when compared with M. coucha, the majority of pairwise comparisons for both species showed significant differences between sampled populations (Table 2).

Table 2. AMOVA results showing the pairwise Φst values (bellow the diagonal) with P-values (above the diagonal) for both M. natalensis and M. coucha (significant P ≤ 0.05 pairwise comparisons, based on corrected P-values, are highlighted in bold)
Mastomys natalensis
Sampling localities Lusaka (Zambia) Banamaiya (Zambia) Kabulamwanda (Zambia) Katoshi (Zambia) Kantengwa (Zambia) Albert Falls (South Africa) East London (South Africa) Kavango Region (Namibia)
Lusaka (Zambia) 0.991 0.072 0.36 0.009 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.009
Banamaiya (Zambia) < 0.001 0.063 0.685 0.045 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.018
Kabulamwanda (Zambia) 0.063 0.045 0.694 0.532 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.081
Katoshi (Zambia) 0.029 0.027 0.027 0.623 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.054
Kantengwa (Zambia) 0.069 0.049 0.013 0.020 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Albert Falls (South Africa) 0.657 0.626 0.538 0.615 0.489 < 0.001 < 0.001
East London (South Africa) 0.870 0.834 0.717 0.857 0.643 0.721 0.009
Kavango Region (Namibia) 0.323 0.312 0.239 0.224 0.243 0.337 0.481
Mastomys coucha
Sampling localities Kaalplaas (South Africa) Mooinooi (South Africa) Rietvlei (South Africa) Otjiwarongo (Namibia) Okahandja (Namibia) Grootfontein (Namibia) Mariental (Namibia)
Kaalplaas (South Africa) < 0.001 0.045 0.018 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Mooinooi (South Africa) 0.384 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Rietvlei (South Africa) 0.105 0.505 0.045 0.009 < 0.001 < 0.001
Otjiwarongo (Namibia) 0.181 0.646 0.159 0.009 0.694 < 0.001
Okahandja (Namibia) 0.299 0.838 0.188 0.136 < 0.001 < 0.001
Grootfontein (Namibia) 0.187 0.539 0.176 0.036 0.143 < 0.001
Mariental (Namibia) 0.355 0.837 0.416 0.339 0.776 0.200

SplitsTree and TCS analysis based on the COI haplotypes within M. coucha showed a large degree of haplotype sharing throughout the range (indicated by C(III); Fig. 2). Some geographic structuring of private haplotypes was, however, evident when looking within the region. Individuals sampled along the eastern and western regions of the subcontinent are respectively recognized by clusters containing unique haplotypes (indicated by C(I) and C(II) on the western side of the continent vs. C(IV) on the eastern side; Fig. 2). In southern Africa, M. natalensis also showed a large amount of haplotype sharing throughout the range but, again, some geographically defined sub-clustering was evident (Fig. 3). For example, N(II) individuals were sampled along the southern African eastern lowlands, and N(IV) represented individuals sampled exclusively in Namibia (Fig. 3). The only sampled locality in southern Africa that showed no haplotype sharing with any other locality comprised individuals from East London N(III). At the continental scale, our COI sequence data confirmed the cytochrome b data presented by Colangelo et al. (2013) in that N(VII) represented individuals from north-west Africa; N(VI) consisted of individuals sampled throughout central Africa; and N(V) represented individuals from east Africa (Fig. 3).

figure

(1) Geographical distribution of haplotype detected for M. coucha. (2) A statistical parsimony network where circle sizes represent relative frequencies of haplotypes and the number of site changes are indicated by cross hatching. Colours correspond to those on the map above. Geographic sub-structuring are indicated by the dotted lines. (3) A Neighbour-Net phylogenetic network for M. coucha showing similar geographic sub-structuring among private haplotypes. Multiple connections represent possible conflict due to ambiguous signals in the data. Haplotype groupings are labelled according to the results of the statistical parsimony network.

figure

(1) Geographical distribution of haplotype detected for M. natalensis. (2) A statistical parsimony network where circle sizes represent relative frequencies of haplotypes and the number of site changes are indicated by cross hatching. Colours correspond to those on the map above. Continental clustering are indicated by solid lines and geographic sub-structuring are indicated by the dotted lines. (3) A Neighbour-Net phylogenetic network for M. natalensis showing similar geographic sub-structuring among private haplotypes. Multiple connections represent possible conflict due to ambiguous signals in the data. Haplotype groupings are labelled according to the results of the statistical parsimony network.

There was significant but weak evidence for isolation by distance in both M. natalensis (R2 = 0.089, P ≤ 0.05) and M. coucha (R2 = 0.028, P ≤ 0.05; Figs S1, S2) and this result supports the intra-clade pattern previously observed for M. natalensis only (Colangelo et al., 2013). The wide occurrence of a common haplotype throughout the ranges of both species would suggest recent expansion events. This is supported by the significant and negative Fu's Fs values for both species (M. coucha Fu's Fs = −13.20, P ≤ 0.05; M. natalensis Fu's Fs = −22.76, P ≤ 0.05) coupled to the results of the mismatch distribution (M. coucha SSD = 0.00, P > 0.05; M. natalensis SSD = 0.01, P > 0.05; Figs S3, S4). Using the optimal model (HKY + G) as part of the Bayesian Skyline analyses, there was little indication that the population expansion could be correlated with the last glacial maximum approximately 18 thousand years ago (Clark et al., 2009). The two species, however, differ in the slope of the line indicative of a gradual expansion in M. natalensis and a more constant effective population size within M. coucha at least during the last 60 000 years (Fig. 4).

figure

Bayesian Skyline Plots indicating demographic population expansions for M. natalensis and M. coucha.

Discussion

At the larger continental scale, the results obtained from the COI gene support the distinct M. natalensis phylogroups detected by Colangelo et al. (2013). Within southern Africa, however, we found no conclusive evidence to support geographic vicariance as a contributing factor towards Mastomys diversification. The results from our comparative phylogeographic study rather favours the hypothesis that over smaller geographic scales, the evolution of M. natalensis and M. coucha are more likely influenced by climate driven diversification coupled to life history attributes.

Both Mastomys species included in this study are characterized by extensive haplotype sharing throughout the southern African range. The absence of any clear phylogeographic structure in the regional data is indicative of the fact that none of the previously defined geographic barriers have a strong effect on female geneflow in M. natalensis or M. coucha. Interestingly, this is in sharp contrast to the patterns previously obtained for southern African terrestrial vertebrate taxa where vegetation (associated with rainfall), rivers, and mountainous elevations were regarded as contemporary barriers to dispersal (Matthee & Flemming, 2002; Edwards et al., 2011; Schwab et al., 2011; du Toit et al., 2012, 2013; Fig. 1). It is important to realize, nevertheless, that in the majority of the published cases, the effectiveness of the documented barriers are closely linked to other ecological and life history factors.

In the absence of any strongly defined vicariant barriers affecting M. coucha and M. natalensis dispersal, we propose that the significant differences detected between sampling sites in southern Africa is largely the result of climate driven diversification coupled to weak but significant isolation by distance detected in the data (also see Colangelo et al., 2013). This is particularly evident when considering the unique haplotypes confined to certain geographic areas. The latter is sufficient to result in a signature of significant population differentiation between the majority of sampling sites, and this pattern is particularly strong in M. coucha (Table 2). When considering the extensive haplotype sharing throughout the region (present in both species), and this is combined with the pattern of isolation by distance, and the fairly large number of private haplotypes restricted to each region (South Africa and Namibia), it is possible to speculate on the mechanisms that could have resulted in such an outcome. Mastomys natalensis and M. coucha are regarded as ecologically tolerant species (Coetzee, 1975; Ntshotsho et al., 2004) and have the ability to proliferate (Jackson & van Aarde, 2004). If this holds, then the dramatic changes in vegetation cover (expansion and contraction of C3 and C4 grasses) as a result of climatic oscillations (deMenocal, 2004; Chase & Meadows, 2007), were clearly not severe enough to confine the species to single refugia. It is thus more likely that multiple Mastomys refugia persisted during unfavourable conditions. The mtDNA patterns obtained in the present study reflect periods of isolation among populations (inferred from the unique haplotypes within regions: M. coucha Fig. 2 – C(I), C(II) and C(IV); and M. natalensis Fig. 3 – N(II), N(III) and N(IV)) and periods of secondary contact (inferred from the large number of individuals sharing a single haplotype: M. coucha Fig. 2 – C(III); and M. natalensis Fig. 3 – N(II), N(I)) (also see Willows-Munro & Matthee, 2011; du Toit et al., 2012; Montgelard & Matthee, 2012). During more favourable periods, populations expand (partly supported by Fu's Fs and the mismatch analyses). The Bayesian Skyline Plots suggest that the last expansions predate the last glacial maximum 19 thousand years ago (Fig. 4), and for M. natalensis, this finding is in agreement with the published report for this haplogroup (Colangelo et al., 2013). In totality, this outcome effectively support the hypothesis of Montgelard & Matthee (2012) who suggested that although climatic oscillations are important in generating genetic structure of rodents in the region, it is not possible to implicate a single glaciation event as a vicariance factor.

When the nucleotide diversity is compared between the two species there are marked differences. Regionally, M. natalensis show similarly low levels of intra-phylogroup nucleotide diversity to those reported previously (Colangelo et al., 2013). In contrast, the haplotypes of M. coucha are more divergent from each other showing a higher number of site changes among haplotypes (Figs 2, 3), and this is also reflected in the AMOVA analyses where all pairwise comparisons between sampling sites show significant differentiation (Table 2). As both taxa are separated by the same documented potential barriers to dispersal, and were exposed to similar climatic oscillations, we propose that the differences in genetic diversity between M. natalensis and M. coucha can mainly be attributed to life history differences between the two species (also see Hodges et al., 2007; Puritz et al., 2012). Throughout the landscape, these two species occupy different niches in the environment (Ntshotsho et al., 2004) but both are characterized by exceptionally high propagation rates (Coetzee, 1975). It has, however, been documented that the reproductive success of M. natalensis is influenced by the fact that the species can breed on comparatively lower quality diets when compared to M. coucha (Jackson & van Aarde, 2004). It thus seems reasonable to speculate that M. coucha is more of a habitat specialist when compared to M. natalensis, and this phenomena can result in a comparatively higher degree of structure (lower levels of connectivity) between sampled populations of M. coucha (Table 2).

Genetic diversification among regional populations of a number of southern African rodent species have now been examined and strong genetic differentiation is nearly always detected (Matthee & Robinson, 1997; Rambau et al., 2003; Russo et al., 2010; Engelbrecht et al., 2011; du Toit et al., 2012). The initial predictions of finding similar mtDNA structures in Mastomys are however not supported by this study. It is thus likely that the ability of M. natalensis and M. coucha to survive in multiple refugia during unfavourable periods can possibly be attributed to the lineages' ability to increase population numbers rapidly, and to exploit a variety of habitat types. The outcome of this study, compared with previously published work from the same region, highlights the need for additional case studies to be performed.

Acknowledgements

Nina du Toit, Adriaan Engelbrecht, Luther van der Mescht and Andrea Spickett assisted with the collection of material. Funding was provided by the NRF (South Africa) through an incentive funding scheme for rated researchers. The Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, provided financial support to AFS. We thank the reviewers for their helpful comments.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.