Volume 19, Issue 8 pp. 627-636
REVIEW

Is “early intervention” in bipolar disorder what it claims to be?

Gin S Malhi

Corresponding Author

Gin S Malhi

Academic Department of Psychiatry, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, , Australia

Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW,, Australia

Correspondence

Gin S Malhi, Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Grace Morris

Grace Morris

Academic Department of Psychiatry, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, , Australia

Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW,, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Amber Hamilton

Amber Hamilton

Academic Department of Psychiatry, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, , Australia

Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW,, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Tim Outhred

Tim Outhred

Academic Department of Psychiatry, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, , Australia

Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW,, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Zola Mannie

Zola Mannie

Academic Department of Psychiatry, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, , Australia

CADE Clinic, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW,, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 December 2017
Citations: 21

Abstract

Background

The notion of early intervention is understandably appealing for conditions such as bipolar disorder (BD), a chronic life-long illness that increases risk of suicide and diminishes quality of life. It is purported that intervening early in the course of the illness with suitable interventions could substantially alter the trajectory of BD and improve outcomes. However, while there are obvious benefits to the prompt commencement of treatment, it is important to consider the gaps in our understanding regarding the aetiopathogenesis of bipolar disorder—upon which the paradigm of early intervention is predicated.

Methods

A literature search was undertaken using recognized search engines: PubMed, PsycINFO Medline, and Scopus, along with auxiliary manual searches.

Results

This review first examines how the unpredictable nature of BD creates substantial difficulties when determining an optimal therapeutic target for early intervention. Second, the challenges with identifying appropriate populations and apposite times for early intervention strategies is discussed. Finally, the risks associated with intervening early are examined, highlighting the potential harmful effects of initiating medication.

Conclusion

Early intervention for BD is a potentially useful strategy that warrants investigation, but until the emergence and trajectory of the illness are definitive, and a clear view of key targets is achieved, a more conservative approach to treating nascent BD and its antecedent symptoms is needed.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.