Practice guidelines on endoscopic surgery for qualified surgeons by the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system: Esophagus
Corresponding Author
Yuko Kitagawa
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence
Yuko Kitagawa, Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorHaruhiro Inoue
The Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHarushi Udagawa
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorIchiro Uyama
Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHarushi Osugi
Department of Gastroenterology, Kamifukuoka General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHirofumi Kawakubo
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHiroya Takeuchi
Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorJunya Aoyama
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorEn Amada
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHiroki Ishida
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYoshiyuki Saito
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMasashi Takeuchi
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYuki Hirata
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yuko Kitagawa
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence
Yuko Kitagawa, Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorHaruhiro Inoue
The Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHarushi Udagawa
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorIchiro Uyama
Department of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Aichi, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHarushi Osugi
Department of Gastroenterology, Kamifukuoka General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHirofumi Kawakubo
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHiroya Takeuchi
Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorJunya Aoyama
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorEn Amada
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHiroki Ishida
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYoshiyuki Saito
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMasashi Takeuchi
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYuki Hirata
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this author
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1Cuschieri A. Endoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy for cancer using the right thoracoscopic approach. Surg Oncol. 1993; 2(Suppl 1): 3–11.
- 2Akaishi T, Kaneda L, Higuchi N, et al. Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 1996; 112: 1533–1541.
- 3Li B, Xang J, Zhan Y, et al. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2015; 150(4): 292-298.
- 4Bonavina L, Scolari F, Aiolfi A, et al. Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: propensity-matched comparative analysis. Surgery. 2016; 159(4): 1073-1081.
- 5Burdall OC, Boddy AP, Fullick J, et al. A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29(2): 431-437.
- 6Chen X, Yang J, Peng J, Jiang H. Case-matched analysis of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic versus open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(8): 13516-13523.
- 7Ikeguchi M, Fukumoto Y. Prognostic benefits of thoracoscopic esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2016; 111(4): 313-317.
- 8Maas KW, Cuesta MA, Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Quality of life and late complications after minimally invasive compared to open Esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2015; 39(8): 1986-1993.
- 9Kauppi J, Räsänen J, Sihvo E, Huuhtanen R, Nelskylä K, Salo J. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29(9): 2614-2619.
- 10Khan M, Muzaffar A, Syed AA, Khatak S, Khan AR, Ashraf MI. Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience. Updates Surg. 2016; 68(4): 343-349.
- 11Li J, Shen Y, Tan L, et al. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer? Surg Endosc. 2015; 29(4): 925-930.
- 12Mei X, Xu M, Guo M, Xie M, Liu C, Wang Z. Minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy is a feasible and safe approach for patients with oesophageal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2016; 86(4): 274-279.
- 13Kauppi J, Räsänen J, Sihvo E, Huuhtanen R, Nelskylä K, Salo J. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (randomised oesophagectomy: minimally invasive or open) feasibility study and pilot trial. Health Technol Assess. 2016; 20(48): 1-68.
10.3310/hta20480 Google Scholar
- 14Mitzman B, Lutfi W, Wang CH, Krantz S, Howington JA, Kim KW. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent survival to open esophagectomy: an analysis of the National Cancer Database. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 29(2): 244-253.
- 15Mu JW, Gao SG, Xue Q, et al. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(45): 12873-12881.
- 16Palazzo F, Rosato EL, Chaudhary A, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides a significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 220(4): 672-679.
- 17Scarpa M, Cavallin F, Saadeh LM, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: impact on postoperative inflammatory and nutritional status. Dis Esophagus. 2016; 29(8): 1064-1070.
- 18Kauppi J, Räsänen J, Sihvo E, Huuhtanen R, Nelskylä K, Salo J. Minimally invasive versus open Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 101(4): 1281-1288; discussion 1288–89.
- 19Straatman J, Wielen N, Cuesta MA, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg. 2017; 266(2): 232-236.
- 20Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Ozawa S, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a nationwide database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 24: 1821-1827.
- 21Tapias LF, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, et al. Outcomes with open and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 101(3): 1097-1103.
- 22Thirunavukarasu P, Gabriel E, Attwood K, Kukar M, Hochwald SN, Nurkin SJ. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy. Int J Surg. 2016; 25: 69-75.
- 23Kauppi J, Räsänen J, Sihvo E, Huuhtanen R, Nelskylä K, Salo J. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 149(4): 1006-1014.
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.063 Google Scholar
- 24Wang Y, Chen C. Survival following video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. J BUON. 2016; 21(2): 427-433.
- 25Yerokun BA, Sun Z, Yang CJG, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a population-based analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102(2): 416-423.
- 26van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2019; 269(4): 621–630.
REFERENCES
- 1Marius K, Vic V. Heller myotomy for achalasia: quality of life comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. JSLS. 2001; 5: 227-231.
- 2Ermanno A, Marco A, Giovanni Z, et al. Esophageal achalasia: laparoscopic versus conventional open Heller Dor operation. Am J Surg. 1995; 170: 265-270.
- 3Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, Athanasakis E, Zoras O, Vassilakis JS, Xynos E. Laparoscopic vs open approach for Nissen fundoplication a comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16: 1679-1684.
- 4Fanzén T, Anderberg B, Wirén M, Johansson KE. Long-term outcome is worse after laparoscopic than after conventional Nissen fundoplication. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005; 40: 1261-1268.
- 5Bais JE, Bartelsman JFWM, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic or conventional Nissen fundoplication for gastrooesophageal reflux disease: randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2000; 355: 170-174.
- 6Håkanson BS, Thor KBA, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O. Open vs laparoscopic partial posterior fundoplication a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 289-298.
- 7Draaisma WA, Rijnhart de Jon HG, Broeders IAMJ, Smout AJPM, Furnee EJB, Gooszen HG. Five-year subjective and objective results of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 34-41.
- 8Elmer EO, David J, Roks Z, Joris AB. Seventeen-year outcome of a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication a plea for patient counseling and clarification. J Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 23-28.
- 9Douard R, Gaudric M, Chaussade S, Couturier D, Houssin D, Dousset B. Functional results after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: a comparative study to open surgery. Surgery. 2004; 136: 16-24.
- 10Yao S, Linghu E. Peroral endoscopic myotomy can improve esophageal motility in patients with achalasia from a large sample self-control research (66 patients). PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(5):1e0125942. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125942
REFERENCES
- 1Choi SH, Kim YT, Han KN, et al. Surgical management of the esophageal leiomyoma: lessons from a retrospective review. Dis Esophagus. 2011; 24: 325-329.
- 2Håkanson BS, Thor KBÅ, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O. Minimally invasive resection of benign esophageal tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 134(1): 176-181.
- 3Ziyade S, Kadioğlu H, Yediyildiz Ş, Büyükpinarbaşili N, Soysal Ö. Leiomyoma of the esophagus: open versus thoracoscopic enucleation. Turk J Med Sci. 2014; 44(3): 515-519.
- 4Ramos D, Priego P, Coll M, et al. Comparative study between open and minimally invasive approach in the surgical management of esophageal leiomyoma. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016; 108: 8-14.
- 5Shin S, Choi YS, Shim YM, Kim HK, Kim K, Kim J. Enucleation of esophageal submucosal tumors: a single Institution's experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 97(2): 454-459.
- 6Bonavina L, Segalin A, Rosati R, Pavanello M, Peracchia A. Surgical therapy of esophageal leiomyoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1995; 181(3): 257-262.
- 7von Rahden BHA, Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR. Enucleation of submucosal tumors of the esophagus minimally invasive versus open approach. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 924-990.
