Volume 60, Issue 8 pp. 1145-1146
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Free Access

Letter: Social work and clinical synergy—Optimizing health interventions for elderly DGBI populations: Authors' reply

Ami D. Sperber

Corresponding Author

Ami D. Sperber

Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel

Correspondence

Ami D. Sperber, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Writing - original draft, Conceptualization

Search for more papers by this author
Tamar Freud

Tamar Freud

Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel

Division of Community Health, Siaal Research Center for Family Medicine and Primary Care, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel

Contribution: Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Olafur S. Palsson

Olafur S. Palsson

Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Contribution: Writing - original draft, Conceptualization

Search for more papers by this author
Shrikant I. Bangdiwala

Shrikant I. Bangdiwala

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Contribution: Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Magnus Simren

Magnus Simren

Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Contribution: Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 September 2024

LINKED CONTENT

This article is linked to Sperber et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18103 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18225

We thank Drs. Chang, Wei and Liu for their interest in our paper on the ageing gastrointestinal tract,1 as expressed in their letter.2 We would like to make a few clarifications in response.

The most important point to clarify is that missing data were not an issue of concern in our analyses, and did not affect the findings. Therefore, the use of multiple imputations and sensitivity analysis suggested by the authors is not relevant to our study. The gastrointestinal symptom data from the 54,127 individuals, whose survey responses we analysed, did not have any missing data points. This reflects one of the strengths of the Internet-based electronic survey methodology we used, where responses can be automatically checked and answers enforced page by page by the survey software in order to prevent missing data.

Chang et al. also commented that it would have been important to include variables in our study on lifestyle factors, socioeconomic factors and chronic comorbidities, as well as doing sub-group analyses by country or centre, in order to reveal disparities in care and to guide tailoring of intervention strategies. We agree that examining healthcare disparities and elucidating ways to improve healthcare related to disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI) are important research aims. However, these were not the goals of our study, which explicitly focused on examining whether older individuals in society generally have lower DGBI prevalence rates. However, future investigations of age differences in DGBI would do well to include assessment of lifestyle and socioeconomic factors, as these might be relevant to understanding the causes of reduced DGBI rates with advancing age. In particular, differences between younger and older adults in living conditions, lifestyle and daily stress, as well as generational differences in emotional factors, could play a role. We hope that our paper will spur further studies that can reveal the factors that explain the mysterious universal ageing-related decline in DGBI rates in populations across the world that we described.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Ami D. Sperber: Writing – original draft; conceptualization. Tamar Freud: Writing – review and editing. Olafur S. Palsson: Writing – original draft; conceptualization. Shrikant I. Bangdiwala: Writing – review and editing. Magnus Simren: Writing – review and editing.

LINKED CONTENT

This article is linked to Sperber et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18103 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18225

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.