Volume 48, Issue 11-12 pp. 1328-1330
LETTER TO THE EDITORS
Free Access

Letter: vedolizumab drug concentrations in neonates following intrauterine exposure

Emma Flanagan

Corresponding Author

Emma Flanagan

St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Peter R. Gibson

Peter R. Gibson

Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jakob Begun

Jakob Begun

Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Simon Ghaly

Simon Ghaly

St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Mayur Garg

Mayur Garg

Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jane M. Andrews

Jane M. Andrews

Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ourania Rosella

Ourania Rosella

Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Gennaro Rosella

Gennaro Rosella

Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Sally J. Bell

Sally J. Bell

St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 November 2018
Citations: 15

Abstract

Linked Content

This article is linked to Mahadevan et al and Julsgaard et al papers. To view these articles visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13960 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14837.

Dear Editors,

We read with interest the study by Mahadevan et  al regarding the initial experiences of vedolizumab in pregnancy and the subsequent letter by Julsgaard et  al documenting vedolizumab levels in two mother-baby pairs at delivery.1, 2 There remains a paucity of data regarding infant vedolizumab levels and no data regarding time to clearance. We present a case series of five patients with IBD who were treated with vedolizumab during pregnancy and report the maternal vedolizumab levels at delivery, along with corresponding neonatal outcomes including vedolizumab levels. The current study is the first report of time to clearance in infants following intrauterine exposure.

Five women with IBD aged 24-40 years became intentionally pregnant on stable maintenance vedolizumab therapy 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks following appropriate pre-conception counselling. Four women had failed and/or been intolerant to at least one anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drug, while Patient 4 commenced vedolizumab after ceasing tofacitinib (clinical trial). Three patients remained in remission during pregnancy. Patient 1 elected to stop vedolizumab at 24 weeks as she had been in sustained remission, while Patients 2 and 3 received their last intrapartum doses at 32 weeks and 30 weeks respectively. Patient 4 had planned to cease at 26 weeks, but, due to a mild flare in the third trimester (Mayo 1 disease on flexible sigmoidoscopy) and history of intolerance to steroids, vedolizumab was given at 35 weeks. Patient 5 experienced active disease during pregnancy and had her last dose of vedolizumab at 30 weeks. All five patients delivered healthy babies at term (38-39 weeks) with normal birthweight and normal Apgar scores (Table 1). One infant had hip dysplasia, which resolved; all five infants were otherwise well up to 6 weeks of age.

Table 1. Mother-baby characteristics and vedolizumab drug levels
Patient and infant 1 Patient and infant 2 Patient and infant 3 Patient and infant 4 Patient and infant 5
Maternal characteristics
Age at start of pregnancy (y) 32 33 24 40 33
Disease type UC UC CD UC CD
Montreal classification Left sided, E2 Left sided, E2

Stricturing ileal, perianal

A2, L1, B2, p

Pan-colitis, E3

Colonic, perianal

A2, L2, B1, p

Previous intra-abdominal surgery None None Ileocolic resection None None
Disease duration (y) 15 10 3 20 14
Medications prior to vedolizumab Infliximab Infliximab

Infliximab

Adalimumab

Azathioprine

Methotrexate

Golimumab

Tofacitinib

Azathioprine

Infliximab

Concomitant medications

MP

5-ASA

MP Nil 5-ASA 5-ASA
Duration of vedolizumab therapy (at delivery, y) 2.2 1.4 1.7 1.3 2.3
Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes
IBD state in pregnancy Remission Remission Remission Activity Activity
Pregnancy complications None None None None None
Gestational age at delivery (weeks) 38 38 38 39 38
Delivery mode Normal Elective CS Elective CS Emergency CS Elective CS
Infant sex M F F M M
Neonatal birth weight (g) 2900 3750 3547 3450

3350

Neonatal Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min 9,9 9,9 9,9 9,9 9,9
Breastfeeding Y Y Y Y Y
Neonatal complications None Hip dysplasia None None None
Days since last intra-partum dose 98 47 55 25 62
Maternal and neonatal vedolizumab levels (μg/mL)
Maternal at delivery 2.50 11.40 9.90 14.40 1.10
Infant at delivery 2.10 4.90 5.90 8.70 1.00
Infant:maternal ratio 0.84 0.43 0.60 0.60 0.91
Infant at 6-8 weeks 0.20 0.70 0.86 0.00 0.00
Infant at 15 weeks 0.00 NA NA
  • CD, Crohn's disease; UC, ulcerative colitis; MP, mercaptopurine; 5-ASA, 5-aminosalicyclic acid; CS, caesarean section; NA, not available, further testing declined.

At the time of delivery, blood samples were taken from the mother and from the umbilical cord to measure vedolizumab concentrations by ELISA (Theradiag LISA TRACKER Duo Vedolizumab, LTV005, Marne La Vallee, France) according to manufacturer's instructions. Infant vedolizumab levels were repeated between 6 and 8 weeks, and at approximately 3 months.

Given that vedolizumab is an IgG1 therapeutic antibody, placental transfer is expected to begin in the second trimester and increase throughout pregnancy.3 Our data show that neonatal levels of vedolizumab are lower than maternal levels at delivery unlike anti-TNF (Table 1). Similar results have been reported in the recent case series by Julsgaard et al and in seven mother-baby pairs from the PIANO registry data.2, 4 There was a negative correlation between days since last intrapartum dose and infant level at delivery (R2=0.62). The vedolizumab levels were undetectable by 6-8 weeks in two infants, and by 15 weeks in one baby (Table 1). In the remaining two babies, further testing was declined.

These results indicate that both placental transfer of vedolizumab and infant time to clearance, respectively, may potentially be less than those documented with anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies. Vedolizumab levels in a larger number of exposed infants are required to more accurately predict clearance. Ongoing case study and registry data remain important to inform appropriate utilisation of vedolizumab in pregnancy.

STATEMENT OF ETHICS

All participants gave written informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study and each participant consented on behalf of their child. Ethics approval was granted through the St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Ethics Committee (reference number 094/17).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declaration of personal interests: Peter Gibson has served on the advisory boards of Janssen, Merck, Allergan, Pfizer and Takeda. His institution has received consultation fees from Janssen, Merck, Allergan, Pfizer and Takeda, has received research grants for other investigator-driven studies/clinical trial funding from AbbVie, Merck, A2 Milk Company, and speaker's fees from Janssen, Pfizer and Shire. Jakob Begun has served as a speaker, a consultant and an advisory board member for Takeda, Abbvie, Janssen, Shire, Pfizer, Ferring Emerge Health, and Falk pharmaceuticals. He has received research funding from NHMRC, Gutsy Foundation, GESA. Simon Ghaly has received speaker fees, research or travel grants from Shire, Takeda, Pfizer, Janssen, Ferring and AbbVie. Mayur Garg has served on the advisory board of Pfizer and Pharmacosmos. Mayur Garg has received speaker fees, research or travel grants from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Shire and Takeda. Jane Andrews has received speaker fees, educational meeting co-ordination, research support or served on advisory boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celegene, Ferring, Gilead, Hospira, ImmunsanT, Janssen, MSD, Nestle, Pfizer, Shire, Tekeda and Vifor. Sally Bell has received consultation fees from AbbVie and Janssen, has received research grants for other investigator-driven studies/clinical trial funding from AbbVie, Janssen, and Shire, and has received speaker's fees from AbbVie and Janssen. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.