Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of the alpha-fetoprotein–producing gastric cancer: emphasis on two major subtypes
Jun Lu
Department of Pathology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorMulan Jin
Department of Pathology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorXiang Zhou
Department of Pathology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorXin Chen
Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorYang Shao
Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, China
School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Xingran Jiang
Department of Pathology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Xingran Jiang, Department of Pathology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China. e-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJun Lu
Department of Pathology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorMulan Jin
Department of Pathology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorXiang Zhou
Department of Pathology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorXin Chen
Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorYang Shao
Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, China
School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Xingran Jiang
Department of Pathology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Xingran Jiang, Department of Pathology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China. e-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Alpha-fetoprotein–producing gastric cancer (AFPGC) is associated with high invasion and poor prognosis, but has not been well-documented due to its rarity. To develop the understanding of AFPGC, and further facilitate its clinical decision-making and treatment, we performed clinicopathological and molecular characterization of AFPGC and its two major subtypes, namely, gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED) and hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC). The clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of AFPGC patients (n = 54) were mainly investigated by immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches. AFPGC exhibited a higher incidence of lymphatic and vascular invasion than conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA). Despite various morphological patterns, there was mostly no evident difference in clinicopathological characteristics between the GAED and HAC subtypes. Target-enriched NGS profiling of disease mutation landscapes discovered 17 differentially mutated genes between AFPGC and CGA. The AFPGC patients carrying ZNF217 mutations had poorer overall survival than the ZNF217 wildtype. Furthermore, ATR showed a significantly higher mutation rate in GAED than in HAC. Overall, our study of clinicopathological characteristics shed light on the differences between CGA and AFPGC, as well as the relationships between the GAED and HAC subtypes of AFPGC. Furthermore, mutation landscape profiling revealed potential diagnostic and prognostic markers for AFPGC and its two subtypes.
Conflict of Interest
Xin Chen and Yang Shao are employees of Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., China. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
apm13196-sup-0001-FigS1.jpgJPEG image, 623.5 KB | Figure S1. Overall survival (OS) of (A) AFPGC and TCGA CGA patients, (B) GAED and HAC subtype patients, (C) stage I/II and stage III patients, and (D) serum AFP level normal and elevated patients. |
apm13196-sup-0002-FigS2.jpgJPEG image, 349.1 KB | Figure S2. Overall survival (OS) of the IHC between (A) AFP negative and positive, (B) Glypican-3 negative and positive, and (C) SALL4 negative and positive in the AFPGC cohort. |
apm13196-sup-0003-FigS3.jpgJPEG image, 1.1 MB | Figure S3. Mutation distribution, type, and frequency of genes in CGA patients. |
apm13196-sup-0004-TableS1-S3.xlsxExcel 2007 spreadsheet , 25 KB |
Table S1. Summary of AFPGC patients' clinical information. Table S2. Comparison of clinical characteristics between AFP, Glypican-3, or SALL4 IHC-positive and negative samples in the AFPGC cohort. Table S3. Comparison of clinical characteristics between AFPGC and TCGA CGA cohorts. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1He L, Ye F, Qu L, Wang D, Cui M, Wei C, et al. Protein profiling of alpha-fetoprotein producing gastric adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 28448–59.
- 2Bourreille J, Metayer P, Sauger F, Matray F, Fondimare A. [Existence of alpha feto protein during gastric-origin secondary cancer of the liver]. Presse Med 1970; 78: 1277–8.
- 3Chen Y, Qu H, Jian M, Sun G, He Q. High level of serum AFP is an independent negative prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Int J Biol Mark 2015; 30: e387–93.
- 4Murakami T, Yao T, Mitomi H, Morimoto T, Ueyama H, Matsumoto K, et al. Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation: a study of 29 cases. Gastric Cancer 2016; 19: 498–507.
- 5Govender D, Ramdial PK, Clarke B, Chetty R. Clear cell (glycogen-rich) gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Diagn Pathol 2004; 8: 69–73.
- 6Kinjo T, Taniguchi H, Kushima R, Sekine S, Oda I, Saka M, et al. Histologic and immunohistochemical analyses of alpha-fetoprotein-producing cancer of the stomach. Am J Surg Pathol 2012; 36: 56–65.
- 7Ushiku T, Shinozaki A, Shibahara J, Iwasaki Y, Tateishi Y, Funata N, et al. SALL4 represents fetal gut differentiation of gastric cancer, and is diagnostically useful in distinguishing hepatoid gastric carcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34: 533–40.
- 8Akazawa Y, Saito T, Hayashi T, Yanai Y, Tsuyama S, Akaike K, et al. Next-generation sequencing analysis for gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation: emphasis on the relationship with hepatoid adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2018; 78: 79–88.
- 9Matsunou H, Konishi F, Jalal RE, Yamamichi N, Mukawa A. Alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation. Cancer. 1994; 73: 534–40.
10.1002/1097-0142(19940201)73:3<534::AID-CNCR2820730307>3.0.CO;2-X CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 10Li XD, Wu CP, Ji M, Wu J, Lu B, Shi HB, et al. Characteristic analysis of alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinoma in China. World J Surg Oncol 2013; 11: 246.
- 11Ushiku T, Uozaki H, Shinozaki A, Ota S, Matsuzaka K, Nomura S, et al. Glypican 3-expressing gastric carcinoma: distinct subgroup unifying hepatoid, clear-cell, and alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinomas. Cancer Sci. 2009; 100: 626–32.
- 12Ikeda H, Sato Y, Yoneda N, Harada K, Sasaki M, Kitamura S, et al. alpha-Fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinoma and combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma show similar morphology but different histogenesis with respect to SALL4 expression. Hum Pathol 2012; 43: 1955–63.
- 13Yang Z, Yang N, Ou Q, Xiang YI, Jiang T, Wu X, et al. Investigating novel resistance mechanisms to third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24: 3097–107.
- 14Bao X, Zhang H, Wu W, Cheng S, Dai X, Zhu X, et al. Analysis of the molecular nature associated with microsatellite status in colon cancer identifies clinical implications for immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8:e001437.
- 15Xia H, Xue X, Ding H, Ou Q, Wu X, Nagasaka M, et al. Evidence of NTRK1 fusion as resistance mechanism to EGFR TKI in EGFR+ NSCLC: results from a large-scale survey of NTRK1 fusions in Chinese patients with lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 247–54.
- 16Zhang Y, Li Y, Li H, Liu Q, Wang W, Jian Z, et al. DHX36, BAX, and ARPC1B may be critical for the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. Can Respir J 2020; 2020: 4348371.
- 17Inoue M, Sano T, Kuchiba A, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T, Katai H. Long-term results of gastrectomy for alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1056–61.
- 18Kono K, Amemiya H, Sekikawa T, Iizuka H, Takahashi A, Fujii H, et al. Clinicopathologic features of gastric cancers producing alpha-fetoprotein. Dig Surg 2002; 19: 359–65; discussion 65.
- 19Ishikura H, Fukasawa Y, Ogasawara K, Natori T, Tsukada Y, Aizawa M. An AFP-producing gastric carcinoma with features of hepatic differentiation. A case report. Cancer. 1985; 56: 840–8.
10.1002/1097-0142(19850815)56:4<840::AID-CNCR2820560423>3.0.CO;2-E CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 20Su JS, Chen YT, Wang RC, Wu CY, Lee SW, Lee TY. Clinicopathological characteristics in the differential diagnosis of hepatoid adenocarcinoma: a literature review. World J. Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 321–7.
- 21Han S, Ma X, Zhao Y, Zhao H, Batista A, Zhou S, et al. Identification of Glypican-3 as a potential metastasis suppressor gene in gastric cancer. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 44406–16.
- 22Ortiz MV, Roberts SS, Glade Bender J, Shukla N, Wexler LH. Immunotherapeutic targeting of GPC3 in pediatric solid embryonal tumors. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 108.
- 23Zhang L, Xu Z, Xu X, Zhang B, Wu H, Wang M, et al. SALL4, a novel marker for human gastric carcinogenesis and metastasis. Oncogene 2014; 33: 5491–500.
- 24Jiang X, Wang Z. miR-16 targets SALL4 to repress the proliferation and migration of gastric cancer. Oncol Lett 2018; 16: 3005–12.
- 25Nakahashi C, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, Nakagohri T, Inoue K, Oda T, et al. Long-term survival achieved by repeated resections of metachronous pulmonary and adrenal metastases of alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer: report of a case. Surg Today 2004; 34: 784–7.
- 26McNamee T, Damato S, McCluggage WG. Yolk sac tumours of the female genital tract in older adults derive commonly from somatic epithelial neoplasms: somatically derived yolk sac tumours. Histopathology 2016; 69: 739–51.
- 27Ravishankar S, Malpica A, Ramalingam P, Euscher ED. Yolk sac tumor in extragonadal pelvic sites: still a diagnostic challenge. Am J Surg Pathol 2017; 41: 1–11.
- 28Shao J, Yin JC, Bao H, Zhao R, Han Y, Zhu L, et al. Morphological, immunohistochemical, and genetic analyses of bronchiolar adenoma and its putative variants. J Pathol Clin Res 2021; 7: 287–300.
- 29Malone M, Fritz BG, Vickery K, Schwarzer S, Sharma V, Biggs N, et al. Analysis of proximal bone margins in diabetic foot osteomyelitis by conventional culture, DNA sequencing and microscopy. APMIS 2019; 127: 660–70.
- 30Kumashiro Y, Yao T, Aishima S, Hirahashi M, Nishiyama K, Yamada T, et al. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: histogenesis and progression in association with intestinal phenotype. Hum Pathol 2007; 38: 857–63.
- 31Yamazawa S, Ushiku T, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, Hayashi A, Iwasaki A, Abe H, et al. Gastric cancer with primitive enterocyte phenotype: an aggressive subgroup of intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2017; 41: 989–97.
- 32Yatagai N, Saito T, Akazawa Y, Hayashi T, Yanai Y, Tsuyama S, et al. Frequent loss of heterozygosity of SMAD4 locus and prognostic impacts of SMAD4 immunohistochemistry in gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation. Hum Pathol 2019; 88: 18–26.
- 33Cai H, Jing C, Chang X, Ding D, Han T, Yang J, et al. Mutational landscape of gastric cancer and clinical application of genomic profiling based on target next-generation sequencing. J Transl Med 2019; 17: 189.
- 34Shida A, Fujioka S, Kurihara H, Ishibashi Y, Mitsumori N, Omura N, et al. Prognostic significance of ZNF217 expression in gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2014; 34: 4813–7.
- 35Cohen PA, Donini CF, Nguyen NT, Lincet H, Vendrell JA. The dark side of ZNF217, a key regulator of tumorigenesis with powerful biomarker value. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 41566–81.
- 36Menolfi D, Zha S. ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs kinases-the lessons from the mouse models: inhibition not equal deletion. Cell Biosci 2020; 10: 8.
- 37Zhang ZZ, Liu YJ, Yin XL, Zhan P, Gu Y, Ni XZ. Loss of BRCA1 expression leads to worse survival in patients with gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 1968–74.
- 38Bradbury A, Hall S, Curtin N, Drew Y. Targeting ATR as cancer therapy: a new era for synthetic lethality and synergistic combinations? Pharmacol Ther 2020; 207: 107450.
- 39Ward CJ, Wu Y, Johnson RA, Woollard JR, Bergstralh EJ, Cicek MS, et al. Germline PKHD1 mutations are protective against colorectal cancer. Hum Genet 2011; 129: 345–9.
- 40Liu H, Liu K, Dong Z. Targeting CDK12 for cancer therapy: function, mechanism, and drug discovery. Can Res 2021; 81: 18–26.
- 41Luo W, Fedda F, Lynch P, Tan D. CDH1 gene and hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome: molecular and histological alterations and implications for diagnosis and treatment. Front Pharmacol 2018; 9: 1421.