Volume 40, Issue 1 pp. 100-106
Thoughts and Progress

Extracorporeal Life Support Bridge to Ventricular Assist Device: The Double Bridge Strategy

Silvana F. Marasco

Corresponding Author

Silvana F. Marasco

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Department of Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Silvana Marasco, CJOB Cardiothoracic Department, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Road, Prahran, Vic. 3181, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Casey Lo

Casey Lo

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Department of Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Deirdre Murphy

Deirdre Murphy

Intensive Care Unit, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Robyn Summerhayes

Robyn Summerhayes

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Margaret Quayle

Margaret Quayle

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Adam Zimmet

Adam Zimmet

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Department of Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Bailey

Michael Bailey

Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 May 2015
Citations: 36

Abstract

In patients requiring left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, it can be difficult to ascertain suitability for long-term mechanical support with LVAD and eventual transplantation. LVAD implantation in a shocked patient is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Interest is growing in the utilization of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as a bridge-to-bridge support for these critically unwell patients. Here, we reviewed our experience with ECLS double bridging. We hypothesized that ECLS double bridging would stabilize end-organ dysfunction and reduce ventricular assist device (VAD) implant perioperative mortality. We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for 58 consecutive patients implanted with a continuous-flow LVAD between January 2010 and December 2013 at The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Twenty-three patients required ECLS support pre-LVAD while 35 patients underwent LVAD implantation without an ECLS bridge. Preoperative morbidity in the ECLS bridge group was reflected by increased postoperative intensive care duration, blood loss, blood product use, and postoperative renal failure, but without negative impact upon survival when compared with the no ECLS group. ECLS stabilization improved end-organ function pre-VAD implant with significant improvements in hepatic and renal dysfunction. This series demonstrates that the use of ECLS bridge to VAD stabilizes end-organ dysfunction and reduces VAD implant perioperative mortality from that traditionally reported in these “crash and burn” patients.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.