Volume 87, Issue 10 pp. 795-799
COLORECTAL SURGERY

Colonic transit: what is the impact of a diverting loop ileostomy?

Sean Huang

Sean Huang

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

These two authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this author
Mary Theophilus

Mary Theophilus

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

These two authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this author
Jiamei Cui

Jiamei Cui

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen W. Bell

Stephen W. Bell

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Roger Wale

Roger Wale

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Martin Chin

Martin Chin

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Chip Farmer

Chip Farmer

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Satish K. Warrier

Corresponding Author

Satish K. Warrier

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence

Dr Satish K. Warrier, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Health, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3181, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 November 2015
Citations: 4
S. Huang MBBS (Hons), MPH; M. Theophilus MBChB, FRACS; J. Cui MBBS (Hons); S. W. Bell MBBS, FRACS; R. Wale MBBS, FRACS; M. Chin MBBS, FRACS; C. Farmer MBBS (Hons), FRACS; S. K. Warrier MBBS, FRACS.

Abstract

Background

Diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) is used following low anterior resections (LAR) or ultra-low anterior resections (ULAR) to reduce anastomotic leak (AL). Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is traditionally used with DLI. However, clearance of the left colon can be achieved with a fleet enema without the physiological compromise of MBP. We aimed to assess colonic transit following DLI in this context.

Methods

A prospective, observational study was performed with patients with rectal cancer undergoing LAR or ULAR in a tertiary colorectal unit with preoperative fleet enema. Radiopaque markers were inserted into the caecum following rectal resection and formation of a DLI with placement confirmed by image intensifier and endoscopy. X-rays were performed at days 1, 3, 5 and 14 post-operation with data collected prospectively.

Results

Ten patients (mean age 57, nine males) were enrolled. Mean time to functioning stoma was 1.9 days (range 1–3). There was no movement in the majority of markers in all patients at Day 5 post-operation. In all seven patients with Day 14 X-rays, the majority of markers remained in the right colon. Two patients had delayed AL, with markers found within the pelvis in both of these patients.

Conclusions

This is the first study to assess colonic transit following DLI using fleet enema only, with results suggesting colonic motility is abolished in this setting. The use of a fleet enema without MBP may be sufficient prior to rectal resection surgery when DLI is employed. AL may actually increase colonic transit. Further research is warranted.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.