Volume 49, Issue S1 pp. 99-106
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Gap volume and sealer penetration of C-shaped root canals obturated with cold hydraulic technique and calcium silicate sealer

Dheparit Wisawawatin DDS

Dheparit Wisawawatin DDS

Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Kallaya Yanpiset DDS, Grad Dip in Clin Sci (Endodontics), MS (Endodontics)

Corresponding Author

Kallaya Yanpiset DDS, Grad Dip in Clin Sci (Endodontics), MS (Endodontics)

Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Correspondence

Kallaya Yanpiset, Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6 Yothi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Danuchit Banomyong DDS, Grad Dip in Clin Sci (Operative Dentistry), PhD, Higher Grad Dip Clin Sci (Endodontics)

Danuchit Banomyong DDS, Grad Dip in Clin Sci (Operative Dentistry), PhD, Higher Grad Dip Clin Sci (Endodontics)

Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Jeeraphat Jantarat DDS, MD Sc, PhD

Jeeraphat Jantarat DDS, MD Sc, PhD

Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 October 2022

Abstract

This study compared the gap volume and sealer penetration in C-shaped root canals prepared with adaptive core rotary files and obturated with cold hydraulic compaction using calcium-silicate sealer, warm vertical hybrid compaction, or lateral compaction using epoxy-resin sealer. Thirty-six extracted mandibular molars with pulpal floor configuration Types I and III were used. The teeth were prepared using XP-Shaper and XP-Finisher and obturated with: group 1: cold hydraulic compaction/calcium silicate, group 2: warm vertical hybrid compaction/epoxy resin, or group 3: lateral compaction/epoxy resin. The gap volume was evaluated using μ-CT. The sealer penetration depth and area were evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The gap volume in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 0.82%, 0.24%, 0.80%, respectively, which were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The gap volumes in the obturated C-shaped canals were not significantly different among the CHC/CSBS, WHC/ERS, or LC/ERS groups. CHC/CSBS was the most convenient technique.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.