Allocation of internal cash flow when firms pay less tax: The role of state ownership and political connections
Yuqiang Cao
Institute of Studies for the Greater Bay Area, School of Accounting, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Xikai Chen
California State University Fresno, Fresno, California, USA
Correspondence
Xikai Chen, Craig School of Business, California State University Fresno, Fresno, CA 93710, USA.
Email: [email protected] and [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMeiting Lu
Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorYaowen Shan
University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorYuqiang Cao
Institute of Studies for the Greater Bay Area, School of Accounting, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Xikai Chen
California State University Fresno, Fresno, California, USA
Correspondence
Xikai Chen, Craig School of Business, California State University Fresno, Fresno, CA 93710, USA.
Email: [email protected] and [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMeiting Lu
Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorYaowen Shan
University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This paper investigates the allocation of internal cash flow among Chinese firms. Compared to their US peers, Chinese firms are less likely to use tax-related cash for investments, particularly in marketable securities, or to increase cash balance; instead, they mainly use tax-related cash to reduce their reliance on external financing. Further tests show the differences in cash allocation between Chinese and US firms are more pronounced among Chinese non-state owned enterprises and firms without political connections. The results highlight the importance of governmental connections in mitigating tax repayment risks and enhancing the flexibility of internal cash allocation.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- Atanassov, J. & Liu, X. (2020) Can corporate income tax cuts stimulate innovation? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(5), 1415–1465.
- Beladi, H., Hou, Q. & Hu, M. (2022) The party school education and corporate innovation: evidence from SOEs in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72, 102143.
- Belo, F., Hao, D., Lin, X., Qiu, Z. & Tong, J. (2021) A tale of two sectors: implications of state ownership structure on corporate policies and asset prices in China. Available at SSRN 3966723.
- Benjamin, S., Zain, M.M. & Abdul Wahab, E. (2015) Political connections and dividends payout in Malaysia: the influence of institutional investors. In: 2015 Financial markets & corporate governance conference.
- Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D. & Saffar, W. (2012) Political connections and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(3), 541–559.
- Bradshaw, M., Liao, G. & Ma, M.S. (2019) Agency costs and tax planning when the government is a major shareholder. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(2–3), 255–277.
- Cao, Y., Feng, Z., Lu, M. & Shan, Y. (2021) Tax avoidance and firm risk: evidence from China. Accounting and Finance, 61(3), 4967–5000.
- Chan, K.H. & Lan Mo, P.L. (2000) Tax holidays and tax noncompliance: an empirical study of corporate tax audits in China's developing economy. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 469–484.
- Chang, X., Dasgupta, S., Wong, G. & Yao, J. (2014) Cash-flow sensitivities and the allocation of internal cash flow. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(12), 3628–3657.
- Chang, Y., Pan, X., Wang, J. & Zhou, Q. (2021) Depoliticization and corporate cash holdings: evidence from the mandated resignation of directors in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, 102004.
- Chen, R., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O. & Wang, H. (2017) Do state and foreign ownership affect investment efficiency? Evidence from privatizations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 408–421.
- Chen, S., Sun, Z., Tang, S. & Wu, D. (2011) Government intervention and investment efficiency: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 259–271.
- Claessens, S., Feijen, E. & Laeven, L. (2008) Political connections and preferential access to finance: the role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 554–580.
- Duchin, R. & Sosyura, D. (2012) The politics of government investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(1), 24–48.
- Faccio, M. (2006) Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386.
- Foley, C.F., Hartzell, J.C., Titman, S. & Twite, G. (2007) Why do firms hold so much cash? A tax-based explanation. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(3), 579–607.
- Gatchev, V.A., Pulvino, T. & Tarhan, V. (2010) The interdependent and intertemporal nature of financial decisions: an application to cash flow sensitivities. The Journal of Finance, 65(2), 725–763.
- Goldman, N.C. (2016) The effect of tax aggressiveness on investment efficiency (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona).
- Graham, J.R. & Tucker, A.L. (2006) Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(3), 563–594.
- Guariglia, A. & Yang, J. (2016) A balancing act: managing financial constraints and agency costs to minimize investment inefficiency in the Chinese market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 111–130.
- Guenther, D.A., Njoroge, K. & Williams, B.M. (2020) Allocation of internal cash flow when firms pay less tax. The Accounting Review, 95(5), 185–210.
- Hadlock, C.J. & Pierce, J.R. (2010) New evidence on measuring financial constraints: moving beyond the KZ index. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 1909–1940.
- Halford, J.T. & Li, C. (2020) Political connections and debt restructurings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101497.
- Hanlon, M., Maydew, E.L. & Saavedra, D. (2017) The taxman cometh: does tax uncertainty affect corporate cash holdings? Review of Accounting Studies, 22(3), 1198–1228.
- Hillman, A.J., Withers, M.C. & Collins, B.J. (2009) Resource dependence theory: a review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.
- Houston, J.F., Jiang, L., Lin, C. & Ma, Y. (2014) Political connections and the cost of bank loans. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 193–243.
- Hu, J., Li, S. & Shevlin, T. (2023) How does the market for corporate control impact tax avoidance? Evidence from international M&A laws. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(1), 340–383.
10.1007/s11142-021-09644-2 Google Scholar
- Jiang, F. & Kim, K.A. (2020) Corporate governance in China: a survey. Review of Finance, 24(4), 733–772.
- Jiang, X., Shen, J.H. & Zhang, J. (2018) State ownership-capital structure nexus: empirical evidence from Chinese listed firms. Available at SSRN 3286287.
- Khurana, I.K., Moser, W.J. & Raman, K.K. (2018) Tax avoidance, managerial ability, and investment efficiency. Abacus, 54(4), 547–575.
- Li, J., Shan, Y., Tian, G. & Hao, X. (2020) Labor cost, government intervention, and corporate innovation: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101668.
- Li, M., Cao, Y., Lu, M. & Wang, H. (2021) Political uncertainty and allocation of decision rights among business groups: evidence from the replacement of municipal officials. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 67, 101541.
- Lin, K.Z., Mills, L.F., Zhang, F. & Li, Y. (2018) Do political connections weaken tax enforcement effectiveness? Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(4), 1941–1972.
- Lin, S., Tong, N. & Tucker, A.L. (2014) Corporate tax aggression and debt. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40, 227–241.
- Ling, L., Zhou, X., Liang, Q., Song, P. & Zeng, H. (2016) Political connections, overinvestments and firm performance: evidence from Chinese listed real estate firms. Finance Research Letters, 18, 328–333.
- Liu, Q., Luo, T. & Tian, G.G. (2019) How do political connections cause SOE s and non-SOE s to make different M&a decisions/performance? Evidence from China. Accounting and Finance, 59(4), 2579–2619.
- Mayberry, M. (2012) Tax avoidance and investment: distinguishing the effects of capital rationing and overinvestment (Doctoral dissertation).
- McClure, R., Lanis, R., Wells, P. & Govendir, B. (2018) The impact of dividend imputation on corporate tax avoidance: the case of shareholder value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 492–514.
- Mukherjee, A., Singh, M. & Žaldokas, A. (2017) Do corporate taxes hinder innovation? Journal of Financial Economics, 124(1), 195–221.
- Pan, X. & Tian, G.G. (2020) Political connections and corporate investments: evidence from the recent anti-corruption campaign in China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 119, 105108.
- Qin, X. & Zhang, X. (2019) De-politicization and innovation: evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(4), 106668.
- Rao, R.P. & Yu, T.R. (2013) Corporate tax avoidance and debt policy. Available at SSRN 2352646.
- Ruiqi, W., Wang, F., Xu, L. & Yuan, C. (2017) R&D expenditures, ultimate ownership and future performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 71, 47–54.
- Tang, T., Mo, P.L.L. & Chan, K.H. (2017) Tax collector or tax avoider? An investigation of intergovernmental agency conflicts. The Accounting Review, 92(2), 247–270.
- Tang, T.Y. (2020) A review of tax avoidance in China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(4), 327–338.
- Tang, T.Y. (2023) An investigation of tax-related corporate political activity in China: evidence from consumption bribery. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 38(1), 77–103.
- Wang, J.C., Yi, J., Zhang, X. & Peng, M.W. (2022) Pyramidal ownership and SOE innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 59, 1839–1868.
- Wong, T.J. (2016) Corporate governance research on listed firms in China: institutions, governance and accountability. Foundations and Trends Account, 9(4), 259–326.
10.1561/1400000039 Google Scholar