Volume 24, Issue 1 pp. 106-111
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis: Lessons learned from an extended 36-joint ultrasonography and 28-joint Disease Activity Score assessments

York Kiat Tan

Corresponding Author

York Kiat Tan

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence

York Kiat Tan, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
HuiHua Li

HuiHua Li

Health Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
John Carson Allen Jr

John Carson Allen Jr

Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Julian Thumboo

Julian Thumboo

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Health Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 November 2020
Citations: 4

Abstract

Aim

To study joint damage severity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients classified using ultrasound power Doppler (PD) and gray-scale (GS) joint inflammation outcomes and the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28).

Method

Ultrasound erosion scores were compared between (a) patients in group 1 (PD positive and GS ≥ median score), group 2 (PD negative and GS ≥ median score) and group 3 (PD positive and GS < median score) vs group 4 (PD negative and GS < median score) and (b) patients with high, moderate and low DAS28 scores vs those in DAS28 remission. Comparative analyses were performed using the 2-sample Student's t test.

Results

There were 1080 joints and 1800 joint recesses from 36 joints scanned in 30 RA adult patients (mean DAS28, 3.58; mean disease duration, 70.3 months) in this cross-sectional study. The mean and 95% CI ultrasound erosion scores were significantly higher (P = .026) for groups 1 (9.75, 6.69-12.81) vs 4 (3.4, 1.11-5.69) with a difference (95% CI) of 6.35 (0.78-11.83), but not significantly different (P values all > .05) for (a) groups 2 and 3 vs 4 and (b) patients with high, moderate and low DAS28 scores vs those in DAS28 remission.

Conclusion

Severity of ultrasound-detected bone erosions was significantly greater when both positive PD and a greater degree of GS joint inflammation were present in RA. This association was not observed when either component was absent. Single time point ultrasound joint inflammation assessment – and not DAS28 – is reflective of joint damage severity in RA patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.