Volume 68, Issue 4 pp. 377-384
Medical Imaging—Original Article

Deep learning denoising reconstruction enables faster T2-weighted FLAIR sequence acquisition with satisfactory image quality

Matthew E Brain

Corresponding Author

Matthew E Brain

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence

Dr Matthew E Brain, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Melbourne, Vic. 3168, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Shalini Amukotuwa

Shalini Amukotuwa

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Roland Bammer

Roland Bammer

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 April 2024
Citations: 3

ME Brain: BVSc (Hons), MBBS (Hons); S Amukotuwa MBBS, PhD, FRANZCR; R Bammer MBA, PhD.

Abstract

Introduction

Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) technologies are the latest methods attempting to solve the enduring problem of reducing MRI acquisition times without compromising image quality. The clinical utility of this reconstruction technique is yet to be fully established. This study aims to assess whether a commercially available DLR technique applied to 2D T2-weighted FLAIR brain images allows a reduction in scan time, without compromising image quality and thus diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

47 participants (24 male, mean age 55.9 ± 18.7 SD years, range 20–89 years) underwent routine, clinically indicated brain MRI studies in March 2022, that included a standard-of-care (SOC) T2-weighted FLAIR sequence, and an accelerated acquisition that was reconstructed using the DLR denoising product. Overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and artefacts for each sequence, and preferred sequence on direct comparison, were subjectively assessed by two readers.

Results

There was a strong preference for SOC FLAIR sequence for overall image quality (P = 0.01) and head-to-head comparison (P < 0.001). No difference was observed for lesion conspicuity (P = 0.49), perceived SNR (P = 1.0), and perceived CNR (P = 0.84). There was no difference in motion (P = 0.57) nor Gibbs ringing (P = 0.86) artefacts. Phase ghosting (P = 0.038) and pseudolesions were significantly more frequent (P < 0.001) on DLR images.

Conclusion

DLR algorithm allowed faster FLAIR acquisition times with comparable image quality and lesion conspicuity. However, an increased incidence and severity of phase ghosting artefact and presence of pseudolesions using this technique may result in a reduction in reading speed, efficiency, and diagnostic confidence.

Conflict of interest

Nil.

Data availability statement

Data generated or analysed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.