Volume 62, Issue 5 pp. 716-725
Radiation Oncology—Original Article

Integration of MRI target delineation into rapid workflow cervical cancer brachytherapy: Impact on clinical outcomes

Sunil W Dutta

Corresponding Author

Sunil W Dutta

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Correspondence

Dr Sunil W Dutta, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, PO Box 800383, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel M Trifiletti

Daniel M Trifiletti

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kelly J Pugh

Kelly J Pugh

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kara D Romano

Kara D Romano

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Bruce Libby

Bruce Libby

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy N Showalter

Timothy N Showalter

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 July 2018
Citations: 4
SW Dutta MD; DM Trifiletti MD; KJ Pugh BS; KD Romano MD; B Libby PhD; TN Showalter MD, MPH.
Conflict of interest: None.

Abstract

Introduction

We evaluated the impact of MRI-based target delineation on toxicity and tumour control after implementation of a protocol to incorporate MRI while minimizing impact on overall procedural time.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed outcomes for a cohort of 96 consecutive patients who received intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer at our institution during 2012–2016. Starting in October 2014, an outpatient MRI was obtained for patients after Smit sleeve placement and first insertion to assess concurrent chemoradiotherapy tumour response. Then, for subsequent fractions, the MRI was co-registered by the Smit sleeve to the planning CT for target volume delineation. The primary and secondary outcomes were toxicity and local control, respectively.

Results

Median follow-up for the pre- (n = 50) and post-MRI-based (n = 46) planning groups was 24.6 and 14.7 months, respectively. Median treatment duration for patients before and after MRI implementation was 56 and 58 days (= 0.052), respectively. Cumulative rectal D2 cc was less for those with MRI-based target delineation (= 0.005). On multivariable analysis, patients with MRI-based target delineation experienced fewer severe late (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) toxicities (= 0.025, hazard ratio = 0.25). Local control was 86% and 91% of the pre- and post-MRI groups, respectively (= 0.959).

Conclusions

Preliminary findings using this technique, which is applicable to other institutions without in-room MRI availability, are associated with lower radiation prescription doses, lower rectal doses and favourable toxicity rates while maintaining a rapid workflow. Longer follow-up is required to confirm equivalent local control.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.