Volume 78, Issue 2 pp. 145-153
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Electronic food records among middle-aged and older people: A comparison of self-reported and dietitian-assisted information

Rebecca Lancaster MND, APD

Rebecca Lancaster MND, APD

The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Sue Radd-Vagenas PhD, AdvAPD

Sue Radd-Vagenas PhD, AdvAPD

The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Fiatarone Singh MD

Maria Fiatarone Singh MD

The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Hebrew Senior Life and Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Yian Noble BASc, APD

Yian Noble BASc, APD

The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Kenneth Daniel MND, APD

Kenneth Daniel MND, APD

The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Yorgi Mavros PhD

Yorgi Mavros PhD

The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Perminder S. Sachdev PhD

Perminder S. Sachdev PhD

Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Nicola Lautenschlager MD

Nicola Lautenschlager MD

Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

North Western Mental Health, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Kay Cox PhD

Kay Cox PhD

Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Henry Brodaty DSc

Henry Brodaty DSc

Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Fiona O'Leary PhD, AdvAPD

Corresponding Author

Fiona O'Leary PhD, AdvAPD

The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Correspondence

Fiona O'Leary, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre, NSW 2006, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Victoria M. Flood PhD, APD

Victoria M. Flood PhD, APD

The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 February 2020
Citations: 10
Fiona O'Leary and Victoria M. Flood contributed equally to this work.

Funding information: NHMRC Dementia Research Team Grant, Grant/Award Number: APP1095097

Abstract

Aim

Nutrition-based applications (“apps”) offer enormous research potential, however evidence of their use and acceptability among older adults is limited. We compared self-reported and dietitian-adjusted dietary intake records among adults aged 55 to 75 years using the Research Food Diary (RFD) app.

Methods

Participants were recruited from the 45 and Up Study and completed a 3-day food record using the RFD. A follow-up dietetic telephone interview was performed to confirm the electronic dietary data. Independent of these interviews, a set of adjustments based on dietetic skills, nutritional database knowledge, food composition and dietary assessment was established to resolve probable reporting errors. The “adjusted” and “dietitian-assisted” records were compared to self-reported records for nutrient intakes and serves of The Five Food Groups using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results

Sixty-two participants were recruited, with 48 using the RFD app which included eight records without any identified errors. Reporting errors contained in the raw self-reported records included: food items with missing/implausible quantities or insufficient descriptions to allow automatic coding. After removal of unusable records, 44 records were analysed. Differences were found between the self-reported and adjusted records for protein, calcium, vitamin B12, zinc and dairy food serves (all P < .001; differences up to 8%). No significant differences were found between the adjusted and dietitian-assisted measures.

Conclusions

Similarities between adjusted and dietitian-assisted records suggest carefully applied dietetic assumptions are likely to improve accuracy of self-reported intake data where dietitian interviews are not possible. We provide four key recommendations to guide this process.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

H.B. sits on the Advisory Board for Nutricia Australia. K.D. is a recipient of extra virgin olive oil supplied in kind by Cobram Estate Pty Ltd. No other authors declare any conflict of interest. Xyris Software (Australia) Pty Ltd was not involved in the study design, data analysis, interpretation or writing of this manuscript.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.