Volume 21, Issue 1 pp. 28-31
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Hemithyroidectomy using local or general anaesthesia: Results of a local regional hospital

Kwan-Pok Tsui

Corresponding Author

Kwan-Pok Tsui

Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, China

Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Wai-Yin Kwan

Wai-Yin Kwan

Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
Chi-Yee Choi

Chi-Yee Choi

Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
Tam-Lin Chow

Tam-Lin Chow

Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 November 2016
Citations: 3

Abstract

Aim

Thyroidectomy is commonly performed for benign and malignant diseases of the thyroid gland. We report our results of performing hemithyroidectomy under local anaesthesia (LA) or general anaesthesia (GA) in a local tertiary hospital.

Patients and Methods

Patients’ demographic data, operative time, length of hospital stay and complications were recorded. Multiple regression analyses were used to assess the risk-adjusted endpoints. The mean follow up was 12.6 months.

Results

From January 2010 to December 2014, 279 patients underwent hemithyroidectomy, of which 229 (82 per cent) were under GA. The mean age was 50.0 ± 14.6 years, and 238 (85 per cent) patients were female. In the univariate analysis, GA was associated with a longer operative time (99.3 vs 75.4 min, P = 0.011) and a longer hospital day (2.3 vs 1.4 days, P < 0.001). After adjusting for other covariates with multiple regression analyses, GA was still associated with a longer operative time by 16.1 min (P = 0.006) and a longer hospital stay by 1.15 days (P < 0.001). It had a higher complication rate (odds ratio = 3.26, P = 0.181), albeit not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Hemithyroidectomy under LA is associated with a shorter operative time and hospital stay, and is a safe and viable alternative to GA in selected patients.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.