Isothermal microcalorimetry provides new insights into biofilm variability and dynamics
Corresponding Author
Monika Astasov-Frauenhoffer
Institute of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Correspondence: Monika Astasov-Frauenhoffer, Institute of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. Tel.:+41 (0)61 267 25 98; fax: +41 (0)61 267 26 58; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorOlivier Braissant
Laboratory of Biomechanics and Biocalorimetry, c/o Biozentrum/Pharmazentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorIrmgard Hauser-Gerspach
Institute of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorAlma U. Daniels
Laboratory of Biomechanics and Biocalorimetry, c/o Biozentrum/Pharmazentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorRoland Weiger
Clinic for Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorTuomas Waltimo
Institute of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Monika Astasov-Frauenhoffer
Institute of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Correspondence: Monika Astasov-Frauenhoffer, Institute of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, 4056 Basel, Switzerland. Tel.:+41 (0)61 267 25 98; fax: +41 (0)61 267 26 58; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorOlivier Braissant
Laboratory of Biomechanics and Biocalorimetry, c/o Biozentrum/Pharmazentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorIrmgard Hauser-Gerspach
Institute of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorAlma U. Daniels
Laboratory of Biomechanics and Biocalorimetry, c/o Biozentrum/Pharmazentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorRoland Weiger
Clinic for Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorTuomas Waltimo
Institute of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate a three-species in vitro biofilm with peri-implantitis-related bacteria for its variability and metabolic activity. Streptococcus sanguinis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Porphyromonas gingivalis were suspended in simulated body fluid containing 0.2% glucose to form biofilms on polished, protein-coated implant-grade titanium disks over 72 h using a flow chamber system. Thereafter, biofilm-coated disks were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence in situ hybridization/confocal laser scanning microscopy. To assess metabolic activity within the biofilms, their heat flow was recorded for 480 h at 37 °C by IMC. The microscopic methods revealed that the total number of bacteria in the biofilms varied slightly among specimens (2.59 × 104 ± 0.67 × 104 cells mm−2), whereas all three species were found constantly with unchanged proportions (S. sanguinis 41.3 ± 4.8%, F. nucleatum 17.7 ± 2.1%, and P. gingivalis 41.0 ± 4.9%). IMC revealed minor differences in time-to-peak heat flow (20.6 ± 4.5 h), a trend consistent with the small variation in bacterial species proportions as shown by microscopy. Peak heat flow (35.8 ± 42.6 μW), mean heat flow (13.1 ± 22.0 μW), and total heat over 480 h (23.5 ± 37.2 J) showed very high variation. These IMC results may be attributed to differences in the initial cell counts and relative proportions of the three species, their distribution and embedment in exopolysaccharide matrix on the test specimens. The present results provide new insights into variability and dynamics of biofilms on titanium disks, aspects that should be explored in future studies of dental surfaces.
References
- Al-Ahmad A, Follo M, Selzer A-C, Hellwig E, Hannig M & Hannig G (2009) Bacterial colonization of enamel in situ investigated using fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Med Microbiol 58: 1359–1366.
- Amann RI (1995) In situ identification of microorganisms by whole cell hybridization with rRNA-targeted nucleic acid probes. Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual, Vol. 3.3.6. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Bodrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 1–15.
10.1007/978-94-011-0351-0_23 Google Scholar
- Braissant O, Wirz D, Goepfert B & Daniels AU (2010) Use of isothermal microcalorimetry to monitor microbial activities. FEMS Microbiol Lett 303: 1–8.
- Cho SB, Nakanishi K, Soga N, Ohtsuki C, Nakamura T, Kitsugi T & Yamamuro T (1995) Defence of apatite formation on silica gel on its structure: effect of heat treatment. J Am Ceram Soc 78: 1769–1774.
- Costerton JW (1999) Introduction to biofilm. Int J Antimicrob Agents 11: 217–221.
- Decker EM, Weiger R, Wiech I, Heide PE & Brecx M (2003a) Comparison of antiadhesive and antibacterial effects of antiseptics on Streptococcus sanguinis. Eur J Oral Sci 111: 144–148.
- Decker EM, Weiger R, von Ohle C, Wiech I & Brecx M (2003b) Susceptibility of planktonic versus attached Streptococcus sanguinis cells to chlorhexidine. Clin Oral Investig 7: 98–102.
- Decker EM, Maier G, Axmann D, Brecx M & von Ohle C (2008) Effect of xylitol/chlorhexidine versus xylitol or chlorhexidine as single rinses on initial biofilm formation of cariogenic streptococci. Quintessence Int 39: 17–22.
- Dige I, Nyengaard JR, Kilian M & Nyvad B (2009) Application of stereological principles for quantification of bacteria in intact dental biofilms. Oral Microbiol Immunol 24: 69–75.
- Drenkard E & Asubel FM (2002) Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation. Nature 416: 740–743.
- Filoche SK, Soma KJ & Sissons CH (2007) Caries-related plaque microcosm biofilms developed in microplates. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22: 73–79.
- Fürst MM, Salvi GE, Lang NP & Persson GR (2007) Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 18: 501–508.
- Guggenheim B, Gmür R, Galicia JC, Stathopoulou PG, Benakanakere MR, Meier A, Thurnheer T & Kinane DF (2009) In vitro modeling of host-parasite interactions: the ‘subgingival’ biofilm challenge of primary human epithelial cells. BMC Microbiol 9: 280–292.
- Hauser-Gerspach I, Kulik EM, Weiger R, Decker EM, Von Ohle C & Meyer J (2007) Adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to dental implant and restorative materials in vitro. Dent Mater J 26: 361–366.
- Heuer W, Elter C, Demling A, Neumann A, Suerbaum S, Hannig M, Heidenblut T, Bach FW & Stiesch-Scholz M (2007) Analysis of early biofilm formation on oral implants in man. J Oral Rehabil 34: 377–382.
- Howell M, Wirz D, Daniels AU & Braissant O (2012) Application of a microcalorimetric method for determining drug susceptibility in mycobacterium species. J Clin Microbiol 50: 16–20.
- James AM, ed (1987) Thermal and Energetic Studies of Cellular Biological Systems. Wright Publ, Bristol, UK, pp. 147–166.
10.1016/B978-0-7236-0909-4.50011-5 Google Scholar
- Kaplan CW, Lux R, Haake SK & Shi W (2009) The Fusobacterium nucleatum outer membrane protein RadD is an arginine-inhibitable adhesin required for inter-species adherence and the structured architecture of multispecies biofilm. Mol Microbiol 71: 35–47.
- Klein MI, DeBaz L, Agidi S, Lee H, Xie G, Lin AH, Hamaker BR, Lemos JA & Koo H (2010) Dynamics of Streptococcus mutans transcriptome in response to starch and sucrose during biofilm development. PLoS ONE 5: e13478.
- Lancy PJ, Dirienzo JM, Appelbaum B, Rosan B & Holt SC (1983) Corncob formation between Fusobacterium nucleatum and Streptococcus sanguis. Infect Immun 40: 303–309.
- Marrie TJ, Nelligan J & Costerton JW (1982) A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study of an infected endocardial pacemaker lead. Circulation 66: 1339–1341.
- Meier R, Hauser-Gerspach I, Lüthy H & Meyer J (2008) Adhesion of oral streptococci to all-ceramics dental restorative materials in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19: 3249–3253.
- Merritt J, Niu G, Okinaga T & Qi F (2009) Autoaggregation response of Fusobacterium nucleatum. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7725–7733.
- Mombelli A & Décaillet F (2011) The characteristics of biofilms in peri-implant disease. J Clin Periodontol 38: 203–213.
- Paquette DW, Brodala N & Williams RC (2006) Risk factors for endosseous dental implant failure. Dent Clin North Am 50: 361–374.
- Paster BJ, Bartoszyk I & Dewhirst FE (1998) Identification of oral streptococci using PCR-based, reverse-capture, checkerboard hybridization. Methods Cell Sci 20: 223–231.
10.1023/A:1009715710555 Google Scholar
- Postollec F, Norde W, van der Mei HC & Busscher HJ (2003) Enthalpy of interaction between coaggregating and non-coaggregating oral bacterial pairs—a microcalorimetric study. J Microbiol Methods 55: 241–247.
- Pye AD, Lockhart DEA, Dawson MP, Murray CA & Smith AJ (2009) A review of dental implants and infection. J Hosp Infect 72: 104–110.
- Quirynen M, Vogels R, Peeters W, van Steenberghe D, Naert I & Haffajee A (2006) Dynamics of initial subgingival colonization of ‘pristine’ peri-implant pockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 17: 25–37.
- Salvi GE, Furst MM, Lang NP & Persson GR (2008) One-year bacterial colonization patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and other bacteria at implants and adjacent teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 19: 242–248.
- Schaudinn C, Carr G, Gorur A, Jaramillo D, Costerton JW & Webster P (2009) Imaging of endodontic biofilms by combined microscopy (FISH/cLSM – SEM). J Microsc 235: 124–127.
- Schwartz T, Hoffmann S & Obst U (2003) Formation of natural biofilms during chlorine dioxide and u.v. disinfection in a public drinking water distribution system. J Appl Microbiol 95: 591–601.
- Stewart PS & Franklin MJ (2008) Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 199–210.
- Tenuta LM, Ricomini Filho AP, Del Bel Cury AA & Cury JA (2006) Effect of sucrose on the selection of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in dental biofilm formed in situ. Caries Res 40: 546–549.
- Thurnheer T, Gmur R & Guggenheim B (2004) Multiplex FISH analysis of a six-species bacterial biofilm. J Microbiol Methods 56: 37–47.
- Vig Slenters T, Hauser-Gerspach I, Daniels AU & Fromm KM (2008) Silver coordination compounds as light-stable, nano-structured and anti-bacterial coatings for dental implant and restorative materials. J Mater Chem 18: 5359–5362.
- Webster P, Wu S, Webster S, Rich KA & McDonald K (2004) Ultrastructural preservation of biofilms formed by non-typeable Hemophilus influenza. Biofilms 1: 165–182.
10.1017/S1479050504001425 Google Scholar
- Wecke J, Kersten T, Madela K, Moter A, Göbel UB, Friedmann A & Bernimoulin JP (2000) A novel technique for monitoring the development of bacterial biofilms in human periodontal pockets. FEMS Microbiol Lett 191: 95–101.
- Weiger R, Decker EM, Krastl G & Brecx M (1999) Deposition and retention of vital and dead Streptococcus sanguinis cells on glass surfaces in a flow-chamber system. Arch Oral Biol 44: 621–628.