Volume 64, Issue 2 pp. 468-474
Paper

Distinguishing Characteristics of Robotic Writing

Aurora Dumitra M.F.S.

Aurora Dumitra M.F.S.

New York City Police Department, Police Laboratory, 150-14 Jamaica Ave, Jamaica, NY, 11432

Search for more papers by this author
Anna Guzowski B.S.

Anna Guzowski B.S.

New York City Police Department, Police Laboratory, 150-14 Jamaica Ave, Jamaica, NY, 11432

Search for more papers by this author
Alynka Jean B.S.

Alynka Jean B.S.

New York City Police Department, Police Laboratory, 150-14 Jamaica Ave, Jamaica, NY, 11432

Search for more papers by this author
Melvin Shaw M.F.S.

Corresponding Author

Melvin Shaw M.F.S.

New York City Police Department, Police Laboratory, 150-14 Jamaica Ave, Jamaica, NY, 11432

Corresponding author: Melvin Shaw, M.F.S. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Grace Warmbier B.S.

Grace Warmbier B.S.

New York City Police Department, Police Laboratory, 150-14 Jamaica Ave, Jamaica, NY, 11432

Search for more papers by this author
Patricia Zippo B.S.

Patricia Zippo B.S.

New York City Police Department, Police Laboratory, 150-14 Jamaica Ave, Jamaica, NY, 11432

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 August 2018
Citations: 4
Presented at the 70th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, February 18–24, 2018, in Seattle, WA.

Abstract

Advances in robotic handwriting technology create new challenges for forensic document examiners. In the past, devices such as the autopen were used to replicate signatures of government officials and corporate companies. In today's technology, companies such as Bond utilize robots to create written documents, which mimic natural patterns of handwriting. They generate customizable written samples by simulating pen movements and letter formations. Four forensic document examiners were given various reproduced questioned documents and utilized a modified ACE-V (analysis, comparison, evaluation, verification) methodology to determine their genuineness. Examiners were able to make a distinction between the human writing samples and the skilled robotic equivalents. Several distinct features that are not seen in natural handwriting, such as even pen pressure and the superimposition of letterforms were observed in the robotic samples. Careful examination of identifying features of the Bond produced documents resulted in an opinion of nongenuineness.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.