Volume 63, Issue 5 pp. 1479-1485
Technical Note

Citrate Content of Bone as a Measure of Postmortem Interval: An External Validation Study

Michael A. Brown Ph.D.

Michael A. Brown Ph.D.

Foundation Instruments, Inc., Colliersville, TN, 38019

Search for more papers by this author
Ann W. Bunch Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

Ann W. Bunch Ph.D.

College at Brockport, SUNY, Brockport, NY, 14420

Additional information and reprint requests:

Ann W. Bunch, Ph.D.

College at Brockport

SUNY

Brockport

NY 14420

USA

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Charles Froome M.S.

Charles Froome M.S.

College at Brockport, SUNY, Brockport, NY, 14420

Search for more papers by this author
Rebecca Gerling B.S.

Rebecca Gerling B.S.

College at Brockport, SUNY, Brockport, NY, 14420

Search for more papers by this author
Shawn Hennessy B.S.

Shawn Hennessy B.S.

College at Brockport, SUNY, Brockport, NY, 14420

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey Ellison B.S.

Jeffrey Ellison B.S.

College at Brockport, SUNY, Brockport, NY, 14420

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 December 2017
Citations: 4
Preliminary results of this study were presented at the 68th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, February 22–27, 2016, in Las Vegas, NV.
Funding provided by the National Institute of Justice Grant 2013-DN-BX-K031.
§

Disclaimer: The NIJ was the sole provider of research funding for this project.

Abstract

The postmortem interval (PMI) of skeletal remains is a crucial piece of information that can help establish the time dimension in criminal cases. Unfortunately, the accurate and reliable determination of PMI from bone continues to evade forensic investigators despite concerted efforts over the past decades to develop suitable qualitative and quantitative methods. A relatively new PMI method based on the analysis of citrate content of bone was developed by Schwarcz et al. The main objective of our research was to determine whether this work could be externally validated. Thirty-one bone samples were obtained from the Forensic Anthropology Center, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and the Onondaga County Medical Examiner's Office. Results from analyzing samples with PMI greater than 2 years suggest that the hypothetical relationship between the citrate content of bone and PMI is much weaker than reported. It was also observed that the average absolute error between the PMI value estimated using the equation proposed by Schwarcz et al. and the actual (“true”) PMI of the sample was negative indicating an underestimation in PMI. These findings are identical to those reported by Kanz et al. Despite these results this method may still serve as a technique to sort ancient from more recent skeletal cases, after further, similar validation studies have been conducted.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.