Presented at the 10th International Symposium on the Analysis and Detection of Explosives, Nov. 22–25, 2010, in Canberra, Australia; the 3rd Annual Trace Explosives Detection Workshop, April 11–15, 2011, in Portland, OR; and the 4th Annual Trace Explosives Detection Workshop, April 16–20, 2012, in Boston, MA.

Funded by the Explosives Cluster of Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) Centre for Security Science CBRNE Research and Technology Initiative (CRTI) Program.

Read the full text

About

PDF

Tools

Share a link

Email
Wechat
Bluesky

Abstract

Trace explosive test surfaces are often required for the evaluation of trace detection equipment to determine the equipment performance. Test surfaces of C-4, Detasheet, Semtex-H, TNT, and HMTD were prepared by transferring trace amount of explosive deposited on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) transfer strips onto different surfaces (Kraft paper, hard plastic, woven fabric, and soft vinyl). The amount of explosive transferred was deduced from the amount of explosive remaining on the PTFE strips after transfer, as quantified by direct analysis using tandem mass spectrometry with thermal desorption. From the data set of over 2000 transfers, we experienced lower transfer efficiency for Semtex-H and Detasheet, and for soft vinyl and hard plastic. However, the rapid quantification mass spectrometric method allowed the transfer efficiency to be determined for all test surfaces used in an evaluation of trace explosive detectors, thereby permitting only the test surfaces with desired transfer to be accepted for the assessment.

References

1Lafontaine P, Pilon P, Morrison R, Neudorfl P. The use of GC-IMS to analyze high volume vapour samples from cargo containers. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 2001; 4: 34–6.
CAS Google Scholar
2Yinon J. Field detection and monitoring of explosives. Trends Analyt Chem 2002; 21(4): 292–301.
10.1016/S0165-9936(02)00408-9
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
3Eiceman GA, Stone JA. Ion mobility spectrometry in national defense. Anal Chem 2004; 76: 390A–7A.
10.1021/ac041665c
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4Fatah AA, Arcilesi RD Jr, McClintock JA, Lattin CH, Helinski M, Hutchings M. Guide for the selection of explosives detection and blast mitigation equipment for emergency first responders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Preparedness Directorate, 2008 Feb;Guide 105–7.
Web of Science® Google Scholar
5Sunde J, Johnson R, Abeynayake C, Ellis-Steinborner S, Hall B. Explosive and object detection. In: F Mulhauser, editor. Use of nuclear and non-nuclear techniques for humanitarian demining and explosives detection. Proceedings of an IAEA Technical Meeting IAEA-TM-32936; 2007 Nov 26-30; Vienna, Austria. Vienna, Austria: IAEA, 2010; 7a.
Google Scholar
6http://www.orau.gov/dhs-tslvissciprog/labs/TSL_Trace.pdf (accessed April 27, 2012).
Google Scholar
7Rhykerd CL, Hannum DW, Murray DW, Parmeter JE. Guide for the selection of commercial explosives detection systems for law enforcement applications. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Science and Technology, 1999 Sept;NIJ Guide 100–99 NCJ 178913.
Google Scholar
8Eiceman GA, Boyett CM, Parmeter JE. Evaluation of a test protocol for explosives trace detectors using a representative commercial analyzer. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Science and Technology, 1999 Sept;NIJ Report 100–99 NCJ 178261.
Google Scholar
9Su CW, Rigdon S, Noble T, Donahue M, Ranslem C. Operational assessment of a handheld ion mobility spectrometry instrument. Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 2001; 3: 45–7.
Web of Science® Google Scholar
10Baranoski JM, Longworth TL. Domestic preparedness program evaluation of the IMS2000TM (Bruker Saxonia Analytik GmbH Ion Mobility Spectrometer 2000) against chemical warfare agents summary report. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Edgewood Chemical Biological Centre, Research Development and Engineering Command, 2003 July;ECBC-TR.
Google Scholar
11Baranoski JM, Longworth TL. Domestic preparedness program evaluation of the RAID-M (Bruker Saxonia Analytik GmbH Rapid Alarm and Identification Device – Monitor) against chemical warfare agents summary report. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Edgewood Chemical Biological Centre, Research Development and Engineering Command, 2003 Dec;ECBC-TR.
Google Scholar
12Hannum DW, Shannon G. Trace contraband detection field-test by the South Texas Specialized Crimes and Narcotics Task Force. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories, 2006 March;SAND2006-1332.
Google Scholar
13 ASTM International. Standard practice for verifying minimum acceptable performance of trace explosive detectors. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2007 March;E2520-07.
Google Scholar
14Pilon P, Tam M. Consolidated evaluation of trace explosives detectors. Protocol 1.0 General evaluation procedure. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canada Border Services Agency, Science and Engineering Directorate, 2011 Nov;Division Report 2011-01 (TR).
Google Scholar
15Neudorfl P, McCooeye MA, Elias L. Testing protocol for surface-sampling detectors. In: J Yinon, editor. Advances in analysis and detection of explosives. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Analysis and Detection of Explosives; 1992 Sept 7-10; Jerusalem, Israel. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1993; 373–84.
10.1007/978-94-017-0639-1_36
Web of Science® Google Scholar
16Pilon P, Hupé M, Chauhan M, Lawrence A. Development of test material for narcotics detection equipment: sand/drug mixtures. J Forensic Sci 1996; 41: 371–5.
10.1520/JFS13923J
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
17Carmack WJ, Hembree PB. Particle size analysis of prepared solutions and fingerprint deposits of high explosive materials. Idaho Falls, ID: Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, 1998 Mar;Report No.: INEEL/EXT-97-01202.
Google Scholar
18Chamberlain RT. The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of Transportation, assignee. Dry transfer method for the preparation of explosives test samples. US patent 6,470,730 B1. 2002 Oct 29.
Google Scholar
19MacCrehan WA. A NIST Standard reference material (SRM) to support the detection of trace explosives. Anal Chem 2009; 81: 7189–96.
10.1021/ac900641v
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
20MacCrehan W, Moore S, Hancock D. Development of SRM 2907 trace terrorist explosives simulants for the detection of Semtex and triacetone triperoxide. Anal Chem 2011; 83: 9054–9.
10.1021/ac201967m
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
21McLuckey SA, Glish GL, Carter JA. The analysis of explosives by tandem mass-spectrometry. J Forensic Sci 1985; 30: 773–88.
10.1520/JFS11010J
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
22Yinon J. Identification of explosives' mixtures by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Canad Soc Foren Sci 1988; 21: 46–53.
10.1080/00085030.1988.10756961
CAS Google Scholar
23McLuckey SA, Glish GL, Grant BC. Simultaneous monitoring for parent ions of targeted daughter ions: a method for rapid screening using mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 1990; 62: 56–61.
10.1021/ac00200a011
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
24Sleeman R, Richards SL, Burton IFA, Luke JG, Stott WR, Davidson WR. Detection of explosives residues on aircraft boarding passes. In: M Krausa, AA Reznev, editors. Vapour and trace detection of explosives for anti-terrorism purposes. Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop; 2003 Mar 19-20; Moscow, Russia. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004; 133–42.
10.1007/978-1-4020-2716-1_15
Web of Science® Google Scholar
25Tam M. Consolidated evaluation of trace explosives detectors. Preparation and analysis of explosive solutions. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canada Border Services Agency, Science and Engineering Directorate, 2012 Feb;Division Report 2012-09 (TR).
Google Scholar
26Colón Y, Ramos CM, Rosario SV, Castro ME, Hernández SP, Mina N, et al. Ion mobility spectrometry determination of smokeless powders on surfaces. Int J of Ion Mobil Spectrom 2002; 5: 127–31.
CAS Google Scholar
27Miller CJ, Yoder TS. Explosive contamination from substrate surfaces: differences and similarities in contamination techniques using RDX and C-4. Sens Imag 2010; 11: 77–87.
10.1007/s11220-010-0053-y
Google Scholar
28Staymates M, Grandner J, Gillen G, Lukow S. The development of an aerodynamic shoe sampling system. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST); 2011 Nov 15-17; Waltham, MA. Piscataway Township, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011;276-81.
Google Scholar
29Giordano BC, Lindsay C, Lubrano A. Determination of nitrate carry-over on Bytac^® strips via capillary electrophoresis. Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory, 2012 Jan;Report No.:NRL/MR/6110-12-9378.
Google Scholar
30Staymates J, Grandner J, Gillen G. Fabrication of adhesive coated swabs for improved swipe-based particle collection efficiency. Anal Methods 2011; 3: 2056–60.
10.1039/c1ay05299c
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume58, Issue5

September 2013

Pages 1336-1340

Quantified Explosives Transfer on Surfaces for the Evaluation of Trace Detection Equipment^†

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Quantified Explosives Transfer on Surfaces for the Evaluation of Trace Detection Equipment†

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information

Quantified Explosives Transfer on Surfaces for the Evaluation of Trace Detection Equipment^†