Volume 58, Issue 4 pp. 999-1002
Technical Note

The Compatibility of Fingerprint Visualization Techniques with Immunolabeling

Annemieke van Dam M.S.

Corresponding Author

Annemieke van Dam M.S.

Biomedical Engineering and Physics, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Additional information and reprint requests:

Annemieke van Dam, M.S.

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics

Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam

Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam

The Netherlands

E-mails: [email protected];[email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Maurice C. G. Aalders Ph.D.

Maurice C. G. Aalders Ph.D.

Biomedical Engineering and Physics, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Ton G. van Leeuwen Ph.D.

Ton G. van Leeuwen Ph.D.

Biomedical Engineering and Physics, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Saskia A. G. Lambrechts Ph.D.

Saskia A. G. Lambrechts Ph.D.

Biomedical Engineering and Physics, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 May 2013
Citations: 22

[Correction added on June 17, 2013, after first online publication: The author's email address originally published was incorrect. The correct address appears here.]

Abstract

The chemical composition of a fingermark potentially holds a wealth of information about the fingermark donor, which can be extracted by immunolabeling. Immunolabeling can be used to detect specific components in fingermarks; however, to be applicable in the forensic field, it should be compatible with commonly used fingerprint visualization techniques. In this study, the compatibility of immunolabeling with two different fingerprint visualization techniques, magnetic powdering and ninhydrin staining, was investigated on fingermarks deposited on glass and on nitrocellulose membranes. With dermcidin as antigen of interest, immunolabeling was performed successfully on all developed fingermarks. We can conclude that immunolabeling is compatible with magnetic powdering and ninhydrin staining, which can be of great forensic value.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.