

research papers
Synthesis, structure and blue-light emission of a zero-dimensional zinc halide with the 4-(4-chlorophenyl)pyridinium cation
aCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang
471934, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
Exploring blue emission lead-free halides with high 11H9ClN)2[ZnBr4] or [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] [CPP is 4-(4-chlorophenyl)pyridine], was synthesized through acid solution evaporation. The compound crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c. The consists of a [ZnBr4]2− dianion cluster and two monoprotonated [HCPP]+ cations. The [ZnBr4]2− unit presents an almost undistorted tetrahedral geometry. The [HCPP]+ cations adopt nearly coplanar conformations with small dihedral angles of 5.05 (3)°; there are relatively strong π–π interactions between adjacent [HCPP]+ cations due to slipped parallel packing, with a distance of 3.81 (1) Å. Significantly, this halide exhibits highly efficient blue-light emission (385–500 nm) with a PLQY of 56.35%.
quantum yields (PLQYs) is a significant and challenging issue for luminescent materials. Herein, a zero-dimensional (0D) organic–inorganic hybrid halide, namely, bis[4-(4-chlorophenyl)pyridinium] tetrabromidozincate, (CKeywords: pyridinium; tetrabromidozincate; crystal structure; zinc hybrid halide; pyridine cation; blue emission.
CCDC reference: 2452243
1. Introduction
Recently, zero-dimensional (0D) metal hybrid halides have shown tremendous potential
as luminescent materials due to their diverse structures and tunable et al., 2021; Haque et al., 2025
). Generally, 0D halides are composed of isolated metal halide clusters or units
and bulky organic cations. In contrast to the high-dimensional halides, 0D hybrid
halides always show strong quantum/dielectric confinement and possess much softer
lattices, leading to an increased binding energy, and allowing for the emission of self-trapped excitons (STEs) with
wide broadband and large Stokes-shifted properties (Morad et al., 2019
; Dastidar et al., 2024
; Wang et al., 2024a
). As a result, lower-energy green, yellow and red light emissions are easily realized
in 0D halides, while higher-energy blue-light emission remains extremely challenging,
especially in the pure-blue region (460–480 nm) (Ma et al., 2021
; Zhang et al., 2021
; Yang et al., 2025
). Great effort has been made to explore the preparation of blue-emitting 0D halides.
For instance, Lei and co-workers have reported a series of 0D hybrid zinc halides
of the form AZnBr4 [A = 1-ethylpiperazine (EP), 1-phenylpiperazine (BP) and N,N,2,2-tetramethylpropane-1,3-diamine (TMPDA)] based on discrete [ZnBr4]2− tetrahedra exhibiting blue emission (452–485 nm) and a maximum photoluminescence
quantum yield (PLQY) of 35.47% (Ma et al., 2022a
). Saparov and co-workers reported two halides, namely, (P-xd)ZnCl4 and (P-xd)CdCl4, where P-xd is p-xylylenediammonium, showing blue emission and a PLQY of 23% for (P-xd)ZnCl4 (Popy et al., 2023
). This group also utilized trimethyl(4-stilbenyl)methylammonium (R+) as the organic cations to prepare indium(III) halides and the halide RInBr4 displays high-efficiency blue emission with a PLQY value of 16.36% (Fattal et al., 2021
). In addition, Zhang's group prepared a 0D hybrid zinc halide, i.e. (C9H14N)2[ZnBr4] (C9H14N+ is the N-butylpyridinium cation) based on the pyridine quaternary ammonium salt. This crystal
shows efficient blue-light emission centred at 426 nm and a high of 49.95% (Cheng et al., 2023
). Despite the significant achievements that have been made in the development of
0D lead-free halides, achieving highly efficient blue-light emission is extremely
challenging due to the limitation of an intrinsic large and an unavoidable (Ma et al., 2022b
; Peng et al., 2021
; Cho et al., 2025
). However, after summarizing the reported studies about blue-emitting 0D halides,
we found that the construction of blue-emitting 0D halides is mainly concentrated
on two strategies. The first common strategy is to adopt d10 metal ions, such as Zn2+ and Cd2+, which have a relatively stable outer electronic structure (Liu et al., 2024
; Tan et al., 2025
; Hao et al., 2022
). The other is to focus on the modulation of organic cations. The organic components
play a crucial role in generating blue emission and the introduction of an organic
cation into a hybrid structure can improve its blue-emission efficiency (Deng et al., 2023
; Belikova et al., 2024
). These findings provide important inspiration for the design of hybrid halides as
blue-light emitters.
In this study, a new 0D organic–inorganic hybrid halide, namely, bis[4-(4-chlorophenyl)pyridinium] tetrabromidozincate, [HCPP]2[ZnBr4], was prepared by adopting chlorine-decorated 4-phenylpyridine as the cation source. This halide exhibits an intense blue emission centred at 432 nm through STEs of the [ZnBr4]2− unit and a singlet of the organic cations with a PLQY of 56.35%, surpassing almost all previously reported 0D zinc halide counterparts. This work provides an efficient way to achieve high-efficiency blue emission through the modulation of appropriate organics.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and methods
Zinc bromide (anhydrous, ZnBr2, 99.9%) and 4-(4-chlorophenyl)pyridine (CPP, 99.0%) were purchased from Alfa, and ethanol (EtOH, 99.9%) and hydrogen bromide (HBr, 35%) were purchased from Aladdin. All chemicals are used directly without further purification. Elemental analysis for C, N and H was performed on an Elementar Vario MICRO instrument. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analysis was carried out with a Rigaku D/Max 2500 powder X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) at a voltage of 40 kV and 40 mA. (PL) spectra, and time-resolved decay spectra were recorded on an Edinburgh FLS1000 fluorescence spectrometer with a xenon lamp and an integrated sphere sample chamber.
2.2. Synthesis and crystallization
For the synthesis of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4], a mixture of CPP (0.2 mmol) and ZnBr2 (0.1 mmol) was dissolved in a mixture of ethanol (3 ml) and HBr (1 ml), and stirred at 353 K for 30 min. Colourless block-shaped crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray were obtained by slow evaporation under ambient conditions for 1 d. The crystals were collected, washed with acetone five times and then dried in air (yield 63.5%, based on Zn). Analysis calculated (%) for C22H18Br4Cl2N2Zn: C 31.58, H 2.35, N 3.13; found: C 32.04, H 2.38, N 3.19.
2.3. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure . H atoms connected to C atoms were located at geometrically calculated positions.
|
2.4. Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations
First-principles calculations were carried out using the projected augmented-wave
(PAW) method (Kresse et al., 1996), as implemented in VASP (Kresse et al., 1999
; Perdew et al., 1992
). The exchange was treated using the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange–correlation functional
in the scheme of generalized gradient approximation (Hohenberg et al., 1964
; Perdew et al., 1996
). The cutoff for all cases was determined to be 520 eV. The convergence thresholds for
the electronic calculations and ionic relaxations were chosen as 10−6 eV and 0.01 eV Å−1, respectively. The standard Monkhorst–Pack k-point grids with a density of 0.1 Å−1 were used for sampling. The valence electron configurations applied in this work were treated as
Zn 3d104s2, C 2s22p2, Cl 3s23p5, Br 4s24p5, N 2s22p3 and H 1s1.
3. Results and discussion
Single-crystal X-ray 2[ZnBr4] crystallized in the monoclinic C2/c. The consists of two [HCPP]+ cations and one [ZnBr4]2− anion. As shown in Fig. 1(a), each Zn2+ ion is coordinated to four Br− anions to form a [ZnBr4]2− tetrahedron, yielding a zero-dimensional (0D) structure, with an average Zn—Br bond
length of 2.4055 (4) Å and an average Cl—Zn—Cl bond angle of 109.04 (3)°, which are
close to those of [ZnBr4]2− tetrahedra in previously reported Zn-based hybrid halides (He et al., 2023
). Each [ZnBr4]2− tetrahedron connects two [HCPP]+ cations via intermolecular hydrogen bonds to form a 0D dimer; the Br⋯H—N angle is 140.47 (3)°.
One [HCPP]+ cation of this dimer is arranged parallel to one [HCPP]+ cation of another dimer, with an interplanar distance of 3.81 (1) Å [Fig. 1
(b)]. These dimers are further stacked into a 3D supramolecular structure [Fig. 1
(c)]. Notably, the pyridine and arene rings are nearly coplanar in the [HCPP]+ cation, with a small dihedral angle between their planes of 5.05 (3)°. The degree
of structural distortion of the ZnBr4 tetrahedron was evaluated by calculating the distortion of the bond lengths (Δd) according to the equation of Robinson et al. (1971
). The calculated Δd value is 1.14 × 10−4 and such a small degree of distortion (Liu et al., 2023
; Wang et al., 2024b
) suggests the weak STEs of the [ZnBr4]2− cluster, which is good for the generation of the narrow emission band of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4].
![]() |
Figure 1 The molecular structure of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4], showing (a) the tetrahedral [ZnBr4]2− anion and [HCPP]+ cation, (b) the interactions between the cations and inorganic nodes, and (c) a packing diagram of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4]. |
The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] matches well with that simulated from the obtained single-crystal data without any
extra diffraction peaks, indicating their high purity [Fig. 2(a)]. The thermogravimetric (TG) curve shows that the [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] crystals have excellent thermal stability; they begin to decompose from ∼250 °C
[Fig. 2
(b)].
![]() |
Figure 2 The basic characterization of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4], showing (a) experimental and simulated PXRD patterns of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] and (b) of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4]. |
The photophysical properties of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] were investigated. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the solid-state UV–Vis of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] shows that the band edge is at about 400 nm. Upon 360 nm excitation, [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] exhibits a narrow blue-emission band centred at 432 nm, with the full-width at half-maximum
(FWHM) of 76 nm, a large of 46 nm and a high PLQY of 56.35%. The Commission Internationale de l'Éclairage
(CIE 1931) chromaticity coordinates were determined as (0.16, 0.07) [Fig. 3
(c)]. The PL decay lifetime is 1.76 ns at 432 nm [Fig. 3
(d)].
![]() |
Figure 3 The luminescence properties and theoretical calculations for [HCPP]2[ZnBr4], showing (a) the solid-state UV–Vis of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4], (b) the excitation and emission spectra of organic molecule CPP and [HCPP]2[ZnBr4], (c) the CIE chromaticity coordinates, (d) the PL decay curves of CPP and [HCPP]2[ZnBr4], (e) DOS and (f) calculated band structure. |
In addition, the luminescence behaviour of CPP powder was tested and it exhibited
a weak blue emission with a peak at 375 nm under 320 nm excitation [Fig. 3(b)], a PLQY of 11.36% and the CIE chromaticity coordinates (0.15, 0.06). The time-resolved
spectrum of CPP under ambient conditions revealed a delay time of 0.86 ns at 375 nm
[Fig. 3
(d)]. Compared to the PLQY of CPP, the PLQY of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] shows a 4.96-fold improvement, which may be attributed largely to the ordered arrangement
and rigid enhancement of CPP molecules in the halide matrix, leading to nonradiative
transition suppression and PLQY improvements.
To better understand the luminescence mechanism of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4], DFT calculations were performed to investigate the band structure and (DOS). The maximum (VBM) of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] is mainly located in the [HCPP]+ cation and the Br 4p orbital, and the maximum (CBM) is mainly distributed in the [HCPP]+ cation [Fig. 3(e)]. The energy band gap between the valence and of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] is 2.48 eV [Fig. 3
(f)], with such a small value indicating an intense quantum confinement effect. These
results further confirm that the enhancement of blue emission of [HCPP]2[ZnBr4] originates from the organic cations and the STE of the [ZnBr4]2− node (Qi et al., 2022
).
4. Summary
By adopting chlorine-decorated 4-phenylpyridine, a zinc-based hybrid halide has been prepared. It exhibits efficient blue emission with a high PLQY of 56.35%, among the highest reported in the literature to date. Experimental and theoretical studies indicate that the emission originates from the synergistic function of the electron transitions in the organic cations and the STE states. This work lays the foundation for synthesizing more efficient blue-emission hybrid halides.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 2452243
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229625005200/vx3015sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229625005200/vx3015Isup2.hkl
(C11H9ClN)2[ZnBr4] | F(000) = 1472 |
Mr = 766.27 | Dx = 1.965 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 12.7583 (6) Å | Cell parameters from 8684 reflections |
b = 14.1507 (5) Å | θ = 2.3–28.0° |
c = 15.2706 (5) Å | µ = 7.34 mm−1 |
β = 110.067 (1)° | T = 285 K |
V = 2589.57 (18) Å3 | Block, clear light colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.16 × 0.16 × 0.15 mm |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer |
2597 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: Bruker Nonius FR591 rotating anode | Rint = 0.074 |
φ and ω scans | θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.2° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2016) |
h = −17→16 |
Tmin = 0.321, Tmax = 0.333 | k = −18→18 |
42246 measured reflections | l = −20→20 |
3223 independent reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: dual |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: mixed |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.067 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0318P)2 + 1.6563P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.02 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
3223 reflections | Δρmax = 0.26 e Å−3 |
145 parameters | Δρmin = −0.61 e Å−3 |
0 restraints |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Data were collected using a using the Bruker D8 Venture with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares on F2 using the SHELX2014 program (Sheldrick et al., 2015) and OLEX2 software (Dolomanov et al., 2009). Non-H atoms were refined anisotropically. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Br1 | −0.12018 (2) | 0.60790 (2) | 0.63802 (2) | 0.04972 (9) | |
Zn1 | 0.0000 | 0.49763 (3) | 0.7500 | 0.04242 (11) | |
Br2 | −0.10686 (3) | 0.40262 (2) | 0.81686 (2) | 0.06137 (10) | |
Cl1 | 0.64771 (8) | 0.61203 (6) | 0.37676 (7) | 0.0784 (2) | |
N1 | 0.1419 (2) | 0.66118 (16) | 0.64135 (17) | 0.0587 (6) | |
C3 | 0.30245 (19) | 0.64480 (15) | 0.55977 (16) | 0.0433 (5) | |
C6 | 0.38753 (19) | 0.63634 (16) | 0.51485 (16) | 0.0436 (5) | |
C9 | 0.5469 (2) | 0.62288 (19) | 0.4290 (2) | 0.0548 (6) | |
C7 | 0.4910 (2) | 0.68112 (19) | 0.55141 (19) | 0.0547 (6) | |
H7 | 0.5070 | 0.7161 | 0.6060 | 0.066* | |
C4 | 0.1950 (2) | 0.60941 (19) | 0.5179 (2) | 0.0567 (6) | |
H4 | 0.1761 | 0.5792 | 0.4605 | 0.068* | |
C8 | 0.5702 (2) | 0.6749 (2) | 0.5088 (2) | 0.0596 (7) | |
H8 | 0.6383 | 0.7057 | 0.5340 | 0.072* | |
C5 | 0.1172 (2) | 0.6185 (2) | 0.5600 (2) | 0.0602 (7) | |
H5 | 0.0458 | 0.5943 | 0.5311 | 0.072* | |
C11 | 0.3673 (3) | 0.5841 (2) | 0.4329 (2) | 0.0597 (7) | |
H11 | 0.2992 | 0.5537 | 0.4065 | 0.072* | |
C10 | 0.4467 (3) | 0.5771 (2) | 0.3909 (2) | 0.0648 (7) | |
H10 | 0.4325 | 0.5416 | 0.3368 | 0.078* | |
C2 | 0.3221 (3) | 0.6911 (2) | 0.6442 (2) | 0.0674 (8) | |
H2 | 0.3917 | 0.7181 | 0.6743 | 0.081* | |
C1 | 0.2415 (3) | 0.6978 (2) | 0.6838 (2) | 0.0734 (9) | |
H1A | 0.2568 | 0.7282 | 0.7408 | 0.088* | |
H1 | 0.087 (3) | 0.663 (2) | 0.669 (2) | 0.081 (10)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Br1 | 0.04176 (14) | 0.05317 (15) | 0.05209 (15) | 0.00680 (10) | 0.01334 (11) | 0.00912 (10) |
Zn1 | 0.0411 (2) | 0.0401 (2) | 0.0461 (2) | 0.000 | 0.01505 (16) | 0.000 |
Br2 | 0.06093 (18) | 0.05586 (17) | 0.07050 (19) | −0.01307 (12) | 0.02665 (14) | 0.00854 (12) |
Cl1 | 0.0741 (5) | 0.0865 (6) | 0.0936 (6) | 0.0184 (4) | 0.0533 (5) | 0.0094 (4) |
N1 | 0.0626 (15) | 0.0559 (13) | 0.0703 (15) | −0.0072 (11) | 0.0391 (12) | 0.0022 (11) |
C3 | 0.0442 (13) | 0.0350 (11) | 0.0497 (12) | 0.0008 (9) | 0.0148 (10) | 0.0039 (9) |
C6 | 0.0440 (13) | 0.0374 (11) | 0.0487 (13) | 0.0012 (9) | 0.0152 (10) | 0.0013 (10) |
C9 | 0.0535 (16) | 0.0524 (14) | 0.0658 (16) | 0.0134 (12) | 0.0298 (13) | 0.0103 (12) |
C7 | 0.0499 (14) | 0.0577 (15) | 0.0560 (14) | −0.0033 (12) | 0.0175 (12) | −0.0091 (12) |
C4 | 0.0512 (15) | 0.0592 (16) | 0.0604 (16) | −0.0101 (12) | 0.0201 (13) | −0.0115 (12) |
C8 | 0.0405 (13) | 0.0672 (17) | 0.0726 (18) | −0.0011 (12) | 0.0215 (13) | −0.0039 (14) |
C5 | 0.0484 (15) | 0.0617 (16) | 0.0735 (18) | −0.0088 (12) | 0.0248 (13) | −0.0001 (14) |
C11 | 0.0575 (16) | 0.0654 (17) | 0.0588 (16) | −0.0125 (13) | 0.0233 (13) | −0.0144 (13) |
C10 | 0.0681 (19) | 0.0719 (18) | 0.0599 (16) | 0.0000 (15) | 0.0291 (14) | −0.0125 (14) |
C2 | 0.0573 (17) | 0.091 (2) | 0.0570 (15) | −0.0194 (15) | 0.0233 (13) | −0.0204 (15) |
C1 | 0.079 (2) | 0.090 (2) | 0.0623 (17) | −0.0216 (18) | 0.0384 (17) | −0.0209 (16) |
Br1—Zn1 | 2.4312 (3) | C9—C10 | 1.372 (4) |
Zn1—Br1i | 2.4312 (3) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
Zn1—Br2i | 2.3798 (3) | C7—C8 | 1.379 (4) |
Zn1—Br2 | 2.3799 (3) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
Cl1—C9 | 1.737 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.361 (4) |
N1—C5 | 1.318 (4) | C8—H8 | 0.9300 |
N1—C1 | 1.318 (4) | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
N1—H1 | 0.93 (3) | C11—H11 | 0.9300 |
C3—C6 | 1.475 (3) | C11—C10 | 1.377 (4) |
C3—C4 | 1.392 (3) | C10—H10 | 0.9300 |
C3—C2 | 1.390 (4) | C2—H2 | 0.9300 |
C6—C7 | 1.396 (3) | C2—C1 | 1.364 (4) |
C6—C11 | 1.398 (4) | C1—H1A | 0.9300 |
C9—C8 | 1.366 (4) | ||
Br1i—Zn1—Br1 | 100.146 (18) | C3—C4—H4 | 119.6 |
Br2—Zn1—Br1 | 110.390 (10) | C5—C4—C3 | 120.8 (3) |
Br2i—Zn1—Br1i | 110.391 (10) | C5—C4—H4 | 119.6 |
Br2i—Zn1—Br1 | 112.128 (10) | C9—C8—C7 | 119.0 (3) |
Br2—Zn1—Br1i | 112.131 (10) | C9—C8—H8 | 120.5 |
Br2i—Zn1—Br2 | 111.21 (2) | C7—C8—H8 | 120.5 |
C5—N1—H1 | 118 (2) | N1—C5—C4 | 120.7 (3) |
C1—N1—C5 | 121.4 (3) | N1—C5—H5 | 119.6 |
C1—N1—H1 | 121 (2) | C4—C5—H5 | 119.6 |
C4—C3—C6 | 121.6 (2) | C6—C11—H11 | 119.5 |
C2—C3—C6 | 122.8 (2) | C10—C11—C6 | 121.1 (3) |
C2—C3—C4 | 115.6 (2) | C10—C11—H11 | 119.5 |
C7—C6—C3 | 121.5 (2) | C9—C10—C11 | 119.7 (3) |
C7—C6—C11 | 117.1 (2) | C9—C10—H10 | 120.2 |
C11—C6—C3 | 121.3 (2) | C11—C10—H10 | 120.2 |
C8—C9—Cl1 | 119.3 (2) | C3—C2—H2 | 119.3 |
C8—C9—C10 | 121.2 (3) | C1—C2—C3 | 121.3 (3) |
C10—C9—Cl1 | 119.5 (2) | C1—C2—H2 | 119.3 |
C6—C7—H7 | 119.1 | N1—C1—C2 | 120.1 (3) |
C8—C7—C6 | 121.8 (2) | N1—C1—H1A | 120.0 |
C8—C7—H7 | 119.1 | C2—C1—H1A | 120.0 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, y, −z+3/2. |
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: the Program for Innovative Research Team from the University of Henan Province (grant No. 24IRTSTHN005).
References
Belikova, D. E., Fateev, S. A., Khrustalev, V. N., Kozhevnikova, V., Ordinartsev,
A. A., Dzuban, A. V., Goodilin, E. A. & Tarasov, A. B. (2024). J. Mater. Chem. C 12, 13537–13544. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bruker (2016). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Cheng, H., Hu, X., Cao, C., Li, X., Xie, R., Wang, D., Yang, W. & Zhang, Y. (2023).
J. Alloys Compd. 968, 171950. CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Cho, S., Sree, V. G., Fulari, A. V., Park, S., Mei, M., Kim, M., Jana, A., Das, D.,
Im, H., Kyhm, K. & Taylor, R. A. (2025). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 680, 215–225. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dastidar, R. G., Okamoto, T., Takahashi, K., Takano, Y., Vijayakumar, C., Subrahmanyam,
C. & Biju, V. (2024). Nanoscale 16, 5107–5114. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Deng, Y., Liang, X., Li, F., Wang, M., Zhou, Z., Zhao, J., Wang, F., Liu, S. & Zhao,
Q. (2023). Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2300043. CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H.
(2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fattal, H., Creason, T. D., Delzer, C. J., Yangui, A., Hayward, J. P., Ross, B. J.,
Du, M., Glatzhofer, D. T. & Saparov, B. (2021). Inorg. Chem. 60, 1045–1054. CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Han, Y., Yue, S. & Cui, B. B. (2021). Adv. Sci. 8, 2004805. CrossRef Google Scholar
Hao, X., Liu, H., Ding, W., Zhang, F., Li, X. & Wang, S. (2022). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 4688–4694. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Haque, M. A., Grieder, A., Harvey, S. P., Brunecky, R., Ye, J. Y., Addison, B., Zhang,
J., Dong, Y., Xie, Y., Hautzinger, M. P., Walpitage, H. H., Zhu, K., Blackburn, J.
L., Vardeny, Z. V., Mitzi, D. B., Berry, J. J., Marder, S. R., Ping, Y., Beard, M.
C. & Luther, J. M. (2025). Nat. Chem. 17, 29–37. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
He, S., Hao, S., Fan, L., Liu, K., Cai, C., Wolverton, C., Zhao, J. & Liu, Q. (2023).
Adv. Opt. Mater. 11, 2300218. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. (1964). Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. (1996). Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. (1999). Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Liu, S., Wu, Y., Wu, J. & Lin, Z. (2024). ChemPhotoChem 8, e202400139. CrossRef Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Wang, W., Zhang, B., Wang, Y., Ren, M., Jing, Z. & Yue, C. (2023). CrystEngComm 25, 444–449. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ma, Y., Sun, Y., Xu, W., Liu, X., Zhong, Q., Song, Y., Fu, H., Yue, C. & Lei, X. (2022a). Adv. Opt. Mater. 10, 2200386. CrossRef Google Scholar
Ma, Y. Y., Fu, H. Q., Liu, X. L., Sun, Y. M., Zhong, Q. Q., Xu, W. J., Lei, X. W.,
Liu, G. D. & Yue, C. Y. (2022b). Inorg. Chem. 61, 8977–8981. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ma, Z., Shi, Z., Yang, D., Li, Y., Zhang, F., Wang, L., Chen, X., Wu, D., Tian, Y.,
Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Li, X. & Shan, C. (2021). Adv. Mater. 33, 2001367. CrossRef Google Scholar
Morad, V., Shynkarenko, Y., Yakunin, S., Brumberg, A., Schaller, R. D. & Kovalenko,
M. V. (2019). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 9764–9768. CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Peng, H., Wang, X., Zhang, Z., Tian, Y., Xiao, Y., Hu, J., Wang, J. & Zou, B. (2021).
Chem. Commun. 57, 8162–8165. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Perdew, J. P., Chevary, J. A., Vosko, S. H., Jackson, K. A., Pederson, M. R., Singh,
D. J. & Fiolhais, C. (1992). Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671–6687. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Popy, D. A., Evans, B. N., Jiang, J., Creason, T. D., Banerjee, D., Loftus, L. M.,
Pachter, R., Glatzhofer, D. T. & Saparov, B. (2023). Mater. Today Chem. 30, 101502. CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Qi, Z., Gao, H., Zhu, X., Lu, Z. & Zhang, X. (2022). Inorg. Chem. 61, 19483–19491. CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Robinson, K., Gibbs, G. V. & Ribbe, P. H. (1971). Science 172, 567–570. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tan, R., Liu, Z., Zang, Z. & Zhao, S. (2025). Chem. Sci. 16, 2136–2153. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Kang, H., Zhang, S., Qu, H., Zhu, L., Zhao, D., Li, X., Lei, X. & Yue, C.
(2024a). Chem. Commun. 60, 2784–2787. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Liu, J., Liu, Y., Li, S., Xu, X. & Lou, Z. (2024b). J. Mater. Chem. C 12, 10267–10329. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yang, C., Zheng, J., Xu, C., Xiao, C., Chang, Y., Zhou, L. & Gong, X. (2025). Chem. Commun. 61, 4379–4382. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, F., Liang, W., Wang, L., Ma, Z., Ji, X., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Wu,
D., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Shan, C. & Shi, Z. (2021). Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2105771. CrossRef Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.