Volume 11, Issue 1 981856 pp. 1582-1590
Open Access

Comparison between Carotid Artery Wall Thickness Measured by Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Angiography and Intimae-Media Thickness Measured by Sonography

Živorad N. Savić

Corresponding Author

Živorad N. Savić

Center of Radiology and Magnetic Resonance Clinical Center of Serbia Faculty of Medicine University of Belgrade, Serbia , bg.ac.rs

Search for more papers by this author
Ivan I. Soldatović

Ivan I. Soldatović

Institute of Medical Statistics and Informatics Faculty of Medicine University of Belgrade, Serbia , bg.ac.rs

Search for more papers by this author
Milan D. Brajović

Milan D. Brajović

Clinical Center Zvezdara Department of Cardiology Belgrade, Serbia

Search for more papers by this author
Aleksandra M. Pavlović

Aleksandra M. Pavlović

Clinic for Neurology Clinical Center of Serbia Faculty of Medicine University of Belgrade, Serbia , bg.ac.rs

Search for more papers by this author
Dušan R. Mladenović

Dušan R. Mladenović

Institute of Pathophysiology Faculty of Medicine University of Belgrade, Serbia , bg.ac.rs

Search for more papers by this author
Vesna D. Škodrić-Trifunović

Vesna D. Škodrić-Trifunović

Clinic for Lung Diseases Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade Medical School University of Belgrade, Serbia , bg.ac.rs

Search for more papers by this author
Academic Editor: Bernhard Schaller

Abstract

The increased thickness of the carotid wall >1 mm is a significant predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular diseases. The purpose of our study was to assess the agreement between multidetector row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) in measuring carotid artery wall thickness (CAWT) and color Doppler ultrasound (CD-US) in measuring intimae-media thickness (IMT). Eighty-nine patients (aged 35–81) were prospectively analyzed using a 64-detector MDCTA and a CD-US scanner. Continuous data were described as the mean value ± standard deviation, and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Bland–Altman statistics were employed to measure the agreement between MDCTA and CD-US. CAWT ranged from 0.62 to 1.60 mm, with a mean value of 1.09 mm. IMT ranged from 0.60 to 1.55 mm, with a mean value of 1.06 mm. We observed an excellent agreement between CD-US and MDCTA in the evaluation of the common carotid artery thickness, with a bias between methods of 0.029 mm (which is a highly statistically important difference of absolute values [t = 43.289; p < 0.01] obtained by paired T test), and limits of agreement from 0.04 to 0.104. Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.9997 (95% CI 0.9996–0.9998; p < 0.01). We conclude that there is an excellent correlation between CAWT and IMT measurements obtained with the MDCTA and CD-US.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.