Volume 69, Issue 5 pp. 523-527
Original Article: Gastroenterology

Multicenter Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Children

Adrien Choné

Corresponding Author

Adrien Choné

Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon University, Lyon, France

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Adrien Choné, MD, Endoscopy Unit-Digestive Disease Department, Pavillon L- Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69437 Lyon Cedex, France (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Pietro Familiari

Pietro Familiari

Endoscopia Digestiva Chirurgica, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Burkhard von Rahden

Burkhard von Rahden

University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Pankaj Desai

Pankaj Desai

SIDS Hospitals, Surat, India

Search for more papers by this author
Haruhiro Inoue

Haruhiro Inoue

University Research Center, Nohon University, Chiyoda-ku

Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yuto Shimamura

Yuto Shimamura

University Research Center, Nohon University, Chiyoda-ku

Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Nikos Eleftheriadis

Nikos Eleftheriadis

Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Kanefumi Yamashita

Kanefumi Yamashita

Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukoka city, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Mouen A. Khashab

Mouen A. Khashab

Gastroenterology and endoscopy, John Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Hinorari Shiwaku

Hinorari Shiwaku

Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukoka city, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Stefan Seewald

Stefan Seewald

Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Peter V. Draganov

Peter V. Draganov

Division of gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lybil B. Mendoza Alvarez

Lybil B. Mendoza Alvarez

Division of gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stanislas Chaussade

Stanislas Chaussade

Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Marcel Tantau

Marcel Tantau

IRGH Prof. Dr. O. Fodor Cluj-Napoca, Cluj Napoca, Romania

Search for more papers by this author
Mathew Abraham

Mathew Abraham

Penn State Hershey Gastroenterology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvaniz, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey Marks

Jeffrey Marks

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gabriel Arevalo

Gabriel Arevalo

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Eduardo Albéniz

Eduardo Albéniz

Gastroenterology Department, Endoscopy Unit, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarrabiomed, Universidad Pública de Navarra, IdiSNa, Pamplona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Francois Mion

Francois Mion

Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon University, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
Sabine Roman

Sabine Roman

Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon University, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
Jérôme Rivory

Jérôme Rivory

Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon University, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
Rémi Dubois

Rémi Dubois

Pediatric Surgery, Lyon

Search for more papers by this author
Alain Lachaux

Alain Lachaux

Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hopital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon

Search for more papers by this author
Nicolas Benech

Nicolas Benech

Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon University, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
Fabien Subtil

Fabien Subtil

Service de Biostatistique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon

Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France

CNRS, UMR5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France

Search for more papers by this author
Thierry Ponchon

Thierry Ponchon

Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon University, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
Maximilien Barret

Maximilien Barret

Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Mathieu Pioche

Mathieu Pioche

Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Lyon University, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 November 2019
Citations: 44

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a recommended treatment modality for achalasia, but there is little published data for its use in children. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether POEM is clinically effective and safe for children.

Methods:

International multicenter retrospective study conducted in 14 tertiary centers that included consecutive children who underwent POEM between January 2012 and August 2018. Outcomes, such as clinical response were assessed whenever available. Adverse events and factors associated with clinical failure were also investigated.

Results:

A total of 117 patients (mean ± SD age: 14.2 ± 3.7 years) underwent POEM for achalasia (type I, n = 36; type II n=66; type III, n=8). Among these, 30 (26%) were pretreated (botulinum injection and/or pneumatic dilatation). Mean ± SD baseline Eckardt score was 7.5 ± 2.0. Clinical success was achieved in 90.6% of cases (95%CI [83.8%;95.2%]) in the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean ± SD Eckardt score post-POEM was 0.9 ± 1.2 (P < 0.001). The mean duration of follow-up time 545 days (range: 100–1612). A total of 7 adverse events occurred (4 mucosotomies, 2 subcutaneous emphysema, 1 esopleural fistula). Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms were seen in 17 patients (15%); missing data for 10 patients (9%). There was a trend towards more frequent clinical failure in achalasia associated with genetic disorders (40% vs 8%, P = 0.069).

Conclusions:

POEM in pediatric patients appears to be effective and safe, although there was a trend towards more frequent clinical failure achalasia associated with genetic disorders. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes, especially the consequences of GERD.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.