Volume 63, Issue 6 pp. 688-697
Original Article: Nutrition

Prebiotics and Bioactive Milk Fractions Affect Gut Development, Microbiota, and Neurotransmitter Expression in Piglets

Kirsten Berding

Kirsten Berding

Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Search for more papers by this author
Mei Wang

Mei Wang

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Search for more papers by this author
Marcia H. Monaco

Marcia H. Monaco

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Search for more papers by this author
Lindsey S. Alexander

Lindsey S. Alexander

Piglet Nutrition and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Search for more papers by this author
Austin T. Mudd

Austin T. Mudd

Piglet Nutrition and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Search for more papers by this author
Maciej Chichlowski

Maciej Chichlowski

Mead Johnson Pediatric Nutrition Institute, Evansville, IN

Search for more papers by this author
Rosaline V. Waworuntu

Rosaline V. Waworuntu

Mead Johnson Pediatric Nutrition Institute, Evansville, IN

Search for more papers by this author
Brian M. Berg

Brian M. Berg

Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Mead Johnson Pediatric Nutrition Institute, Evansville, IN

Search for more papers by this author
Michael J. Miller

Michael J. Miller

Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Search for more papers by this author
Ryan N. Dilger

Ryan N. Dilger

Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Piglet Nutrition and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Search for more papers by this author
Sharon M. Donovan

Corresponding Author

Sharon M. Donovan

Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sharon M. Donovan, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, 339 Bevier Hall, 905 South Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 December 2016
Citations: 59

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text, and links to the digital files are provided in the HTML text of this article on the journal's Web site (www.jpgn.org).

This study was supported by a grant from Mead Johnson Nutrition (Evansville, IN).

S.D., M.M., and R.D. have received grant funding. S.D. has served on advisory boards, and S.D., R.D., M.W., M.M., L.A., and R.D. have consulted for Mead Johnson Nutrition. M.C., R.W., and B.B. are employees of Mead Johnson Nutrition. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.

ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study tested the hypothesis that the addition of prebiotics and 2 functional milk ingredients to infant formula would maintain normal growth and gut development, and modify microbiota composition and neurotransmitter gene expression in neonatal piglets.

Methods:

Two-day-old male piglets (n = 24) were fed formula (CONT) or formula with polydextrose (1.2 g/100 g diet), galactooligosaccharides (3.5 g/100 g diet), bovine lactoferrin (0.3 g/100 g diet), and milk fat globule membrane-10 (2.5 g/100 g diet) (TEST) for 30 days. On study day 31, intestinal samples, ileal and colonic contents, and feces were collected. Intestinal histomorphology, disaccharidase activity, serotonin (5'HT), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) were measured. Gut microbiota composition was assessed by pyrosequencing of the V3–V5 regions of 16S rRNA and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Results:

Body weight of piglets on TEST was greater (P ⩽ 0.05) than CONT on days 17 to 30. Both groups displayed growth patterns within the range observed for sow-reared pigs. TEST piglets had greater jejunal lactase (P = 0.03) and higher (P = 0.003) ileal VIP expression. TEST piglets tended to have greater (P = 0.09) sucrase activity, longer (P = 0.08) ileal villi, and greater (P = 0.06) duodenal TH expression. Microbial communities of TEST piglets differed from CONT in ascending colon (AC, P = 0.001) and feces (P ⩽ 0.05). CONT piglets had greater relative abundances of Mogibacterium, Collinsella, Klebsiella, Escherichia/Shigella, Eubacterium, and Roseburia compared with TEST piglets in AC. In feces, CONT piglets harbored lower (P ⩽ 0.05) proportions of Parabacteroides, Clostridium IV, Lutispora, and Sutterella than TEST piglets.

Conclusions:

A mixture of bioactive ingredients improved weight gain and gut maturation, modulated colonic and fecal microbial composition, and reduced the proportions of opportunistic pathogens.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.