Volume 117, Issue 2 pp. 350-356
Article

Impact of Re-resection for Inadequate Margins on the Prognosis of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer Treated by Laser Microsurgery

Martin C. Jäckel MD

Corresponding Author

Martin C. Jäckel MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

Martin C. Jäckel, MD, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital of Darmstadt, Heidelberger Landstr. 379, D-64297 Darmstadt, Germany.Search for more papers by this author
Petra Ambrosch MD

Petra Ambrosch MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Kiel, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Alexios Martin MD

Alexios Martin MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Search for more papers by this author
Wolfgang Steiner MD

Wolfgang Steiner MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 January 2009
Citations: 113

Presented in part at the 50th Annual Conference of the Austrian Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Klagenfurt, September 15, 2006.

Abstract

Objectives: Positive or uncertain surgical margins left untreated have a distinct prognostic relevance in squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract. An advantage of transoral laser microsurgery is that it can be easily repeated if inadequate resection margins are found postoperatively. The present study investigates the impact of laser surgical reresection on the outcome of patients.

Study Design: The authors conducted a retrospective unicenter study.

Methods: A review of 1,467 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract who were initially treated by transoral laser microsurgery with curative intent between August 1986 and December 2002 was conducted. Locoregional control as well as TNM adjusted and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Three hundred eighty-six patients have required reresection to obtain clear surgical margins, in 70 of whom residual carcinoma has been detected in revision specimens. Patients without need for revision and those in whom revision specimens were found tumor-free had an almost identical locoregional control (P = .4611). In patients with positive revision specimens, however, locoregional control was significantly worsened (P = .0058). Neither the need for reresection nor the detection of further tumor tissue in revision specimens affected TNM adjusted or overall survival.

Conclusions: Survival of patients was similar whether clear resection margins were reached within the first surgical step or with revision surgery. However, patients in whom reresection specimens contained residual carcinoma had an increased risk of locoregional failure and should undergo a further reresection or at least a very close follow up.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.