Volume 117, Issue 2 pp. 238-241
Article

Distress in Spouses and Patients After Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer

Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw PhD

Corresponding Author

Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw PhD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw, PhD, Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Search for more papers by this author
Simone E. Eerenstein MD, PhD

Simone E. Eerenstein MD, PhD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Search for more papers by this author
Mecheline H. Van der Linden PhD

Mecheline H. Van der Linden PhD

Department of Medical Psychology/Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Search for more papers by this author
Dirk J. Kuik MSc

Dirk J. Kuik MSc

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Search for more papers by this author
Remco de Bree MD, PhD

Remco de Bree MD, PhD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Search for more papers by this author
C. Rene Leemans MD, PhD

C. Rene Leemans MD, PhD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 January 2009
Citations: 136

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to obtain insight into distress in spouses and patients treated for head and neck cancer.

Methods: Forty-one patient–spouse pairs completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Inclusion criteria included curative treatment for head and neck cancer. Exclusion criteria were visiting the clinic without a spouse, bad news at the routine follow-up examination, diseases causing cognitive dysfunction, and poor understanding of the Dutch language. Next to the HADS, the assessment protocol included age, gender, health status, coping strategy, time since cancer treatment, tumor stage and site, treatment modality, functional and social impairment, and caregiving burden.

Results: A clinical level of distress was noted in 20% of the spouses and in 27% of the patients. Distress in spouses was related to the presence of a feeding tube in patients, a passive coping style, less vitality, and a disrupted daily life schedule resulting from caregiving. Distress in patients was related to the presence of a feeding tube, speech and swallowing problems, less social contacts, a passive style of coping, and nonexpression of emotions.

Conclusion: Distress is often present in spouses and patients treated for head and neck cancer. Routine screening for psychologic distress is recommended.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.