Volume 117, Issue 2 pp. 319-322
Article

Electromyographic Findings After Different Selective Neck Dissections

Tetsuya Tsuji MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Tetsuya Tsuji MD, PhD

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Dr. Tetsuya Tsuji, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinanomachi 35, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.Search for more papers by this author
Akira Tanuma MD

Akira Tanuma MD

Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Tetsuro Onitsuka MD

Tetsuro Onitsuka MD

Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Mitsuru Ebihara MD

Mitsuru Ebihara MD

Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yoshiyuki Iida MD

Yoshiyuki Iida MD

Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Akio Kimura MD, PhD

Akio Kimura MD, PhD

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University Tsukigase Rehabilitation Center, Izu city, Shizuoka, Japan.

Search for more papers by this author
Meigen Liu MD, PhD

Meigen Liu MD, PhD

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 January 2009
Citations: 22

Abstract

Objectives: The objective was to compare electrophysiologic investigations of the upper trapezius muscle (UT) after different selective neck dissections (SND) and analyze the differences between types of SND and the preservation and excision of the cervical nerves (the C2–4 rami of the cervical plexus).

Study Design: Retrospective study of 54 patients (average age, 65.1 ± 9.6 yr, 45 males) with 70 SND.

Methods: Patients underwent needle electromyography (EMG) of the UT by 4 months after surgery. The findings were rated according to the 5 point EMG scale system from 1 (total denervation: positive sharp wave or fibrillation potential at rest and electrical silence at voluntary contraction) to 5 (normal pattern).

Results: The average EMG scale was 1.7 ± 1.1, 58.6% for score 1 and only 5.7% for score 5. There was not a significant difference in the EMG scale between the types of SND, whereas the group in which the cervical nerves were excised was significantly lower than in that in which it was preserved. The average EMG scales in the former and latter were 1.5 ± 0.8 and 2.0 ± 1.3, 68.8%.

Conclusions: The study data confirm that complete or incomplete denervation of the UT was caused by axonal injury of the spinal accessory nerve, even though it was spared, because of traction of the nerve during neck dissection. Second, the excision of the C2 to 4 rami of the cervical plexus caused worse damage of the UT. It is suggested that it is important to preserve the cervical nerves to avoid denervation of the UT.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.